The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dutch508 on November 19, 2021, 04:10:13 PM
-
Star Member Scottie Mom (4,377 posts)
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216067604
WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH THAT JURY!!!! THAT ASSHOLE WAS GUILTY AS ALL HELL!!!!!!!
There is NO reason that the that POS Killer walks!!!!
Someone didn't watch the trial...
Star Member Bettie (12,231 posts)
1. White Supremacy
that's why he's walking.
:bs:
Star Member Scottie Mom (4,377 posts)
2. That and gun loving stupidity along with a Trump Humper Judge! EOM
:bs:
Star Member Johnny2X2X (12,092 posts)
3. The judge was a racist
The judge did not allow a fair trial, every second he was rigging it so the prosecution couldn't make a case.
:bs:
Jose Garcia (1,878 posts)
32. All of the victims were white
One of the jurors was African-American.
Star Member Bettie (12,231 posts)
35. And the victims were supporting people who weren't white
protesting the shooting of a black man.
To white supremacists, the worst crime of all is standing up for those who aren't white...being a 'race traitor'.
The fact that they were white was the ONLY reason there was even a trial.
:thatsright: :mental: :mental: :mental: :mental: :mental: :mental: :mental: :mental: :mental: :mental:
Star Member Bettie (12,231 posts)
43. And can you imagine being the only non-white person in
a room full of people eager to let him go free? The one Black person daring to object to a bunch of white people's firmly held belief.
themaguffin (2,884 posts)
23. Have you served on a jury?
Star Member Scottie Mom (4,377 posts)
26. Yes.
And I have tried numerous jury cases. Why do you ask?
:bs: :bs: :bs: :bs: :bs: :bs: :bs: :bs: :bs: :bs:
Star Member hamsterjill (12,726 posts)
44. And Rittenhouse will be just like Zimmerman.
He’ll kill again. Zimmerman has been in altercation after altercation since he was acquitted. Trying to be a smart ass. Rittenhouse will be no different.
Makes me sick to my stomach.
JohnQFunk (288 posts)
11. All of the above plus a HUGE LOOPHOLE in Wisconsin law
Drone footage shows the little bigot retreating/fleeing, which under Wisconsin statutes allows him to claim defending himself. Something tells me that the smug little fascist is going to discover that theCosmic Lazy Susan of Karma will not treat him well.
Star Member LonePirate (11,700 posts)
12. I hope someone interviews the non-white members of the jury to explain the acquittal vote.
:thatsright:
Star Member Sugarcoated (7,077 posts)
25. It's okay....the punk will break the law again. He's stupid, pampered and
entitled. Very likely the next judge won't be a Trump loon. The arc of justice is long but it gets there
Polybius (7,671 posts)
30. A jury can only vote "Guilty" if it's beyond a shadow of a doubt
Don't blame the jury, with what was presented to them they may have had little choice.
Star Member Scottie Mom (4,377 posts)
31. No. Beyond a REASONABLE doubt.
Beyond a shadow of a doubt implies no doubt whatsoever.
IMO, there was no reasonable doubt that Rittenhouse was guilty.
You should try to explain it... :whatever:
Star Member Scottie Mom (4,377 posts)
34. IMO, one has to be a racist, an idiot, blind to justice or all three to find self defense.
Our Nation, IMO, has become a denizen of sewer dwellers thanks to the RW.
Star Member Scottie Mom (4,377 posts)
45. I watched the trial. I have tried jury cases.
Your experience is?
No, they did not have the benefit of my insight. Over 30 years of legal experience and trial work.
Hint: Don't assume the person you are posting to has no experience in the field upon which you are commenting.
:yawn: You are acting like it...
Star Member Scottie Mom (4,377 posts)
49. RW whites protecting RW whites.
Disgusting.
We need to dox the shit out of this Scottie Mom asshole...
-
That thread demonstrates that within the "stand your ground" vs "duty to retreat" debate, that "duty to retreat" was a calculated counter position to stake out, rather than their real position.
Even when retreating, they object to armed self defense.
-
A lot of DU-members are essentially abandoning the site after this, I suspect.
-
"To white supremacists, the worst crime of all is standing up for those who aren't white...being a 'race traitor'."
Nowadays, you'd be MUCH more likely to hear that term used by leftists like the DUmmies to describe blacks, Hispanics, etc., who express conservative sentiments on any subject.
"Star Member hamsterjill (12,726 posts)
44. And Rittenhouse will be just like Zimmerman.
He’ll kill again. Zimmerman has been in altercation after altercation since he was acquitted."
1. Has Zimmerman killed again? No.
2. He's been in a couple altercations, but most of them were instigated by someone else, such as that lunatic Matthew Apperson who tried to kill him.
-
Jose Garcia (1,878 posts)
32. All of the victims were white
One of the jurors was African-American.
OK Jose. Let's extrapolate, shall we you dolt.
Not certain of the exact and demographics size of Kenosha, but lets just say for Sh*t's and Giggles (The new nickname for Joe & Kamala), it is 25 thousand peeps. And likely 95% white.
According to the law, one is supposed to be judged by a jury of their peers. Wouldn't it logically make sense that Rittenhouse was judged by 17-25 year old males? Same for O.J. 26 years ago. A jury of O.J. Simpson's peers would be Roger Staubach, Howard Cosell, and many other Heisman Trophy winners, running backs in college football & NFL and former broadcasters.
The slippery slope that libs claim never happens.
-
OK Jose. Let's extrapolate, shall we you dolt.
Not certain of the exact and demographics size of Kenosha, but lets just say for Sh*t's and Giggles (The new nickname for Joe & Kamala), it is 25 thousand peeps. And likely 95% white.
According to the law, one is supposed to be judged by a jury of their peers. Wouldn't it logically make sense that Rittenhouse was judged by 17-25 year old males? Same for O.J. 26 years ago. A jury of O.J. Simpson's peers would be Roger Staubach, Howard Cosell, and many other Heisman Trophy winners, running backs in college football & NFL and former broadcasters.
The slippery slope that libs claim never happens.
Not a bad guesstimate, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenosha,_Wisconsin#Demographics . Kenosha has ~100K people, ~10% black. So out of a jury of 12, 1 black is as close to proportional representation as one can get without chopping people in quarters.
-
Response to Captain Stern (Reply #46)Fri Nov 19, 2021, 04:36 PM
Star Member Scottie Mom (4,381 posts)
48. I don't offer my expertise if not asked to do so.
I have plenty of work in Los Angeles county and do not need to look out of state. But, thanks for the suggestion.
BTW: Thanks also for your permission to post here. I don't think I need your permission, but nice of you to give me the right to complain.
Give me a break.
-
Star Member Scottie Mom (4,377 posts)
26. Yes.
And I have tried numerous jury cases. Why do you ask?
So this dummie wants me to believe that he/she/it has been on a jury and being a prosecutor?
This Dummie is moron... or a liberal lawyer.
-
Star Member Scottie Mom (4,377 posts)
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216067604
WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH THAT JURY!!!! THAT ASSHOLE WAS GUILTY AS ALL HELL!!!!!!!
There is NO reason that the that POS Killer walks!!!!
For someone so experienced in court room wars as you claim to be yet so shocked by this unanimous decision is interesting.
Being a legal professional didn't you always hate it when some uninformed person, at a safe distance, and without access to the evidence screamed at the clouds in support of their narrative?
Irritating as hell, don't you think?
-
Sh*t's and Giggles (The new nickname for Joe & Kamala)
:rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :hi5: :hi5:
-
Gloria Allred? Is that you?
-
The jury wasn't wrong. What was wrong with the prosecutors that by the end of the trial they were reduced to saying "Sometimes you take a beating"?
-
... for Sh*t's and Giggles (The new nickname for Joe & Kamala) ...
Too kind, but :hi5: .
-
Too kind, but :hi5: .
Heard that on a radio show yesterday morning, and almost spit up coffee laughing.
-
Liberals hate it when people do what is right regardless of their race. I believe this is because of the yardstick of liberalism that they use to measure right and wrong. If it aids the liberal narrative then it is right. If it hinders or falsifies the liberal narrative then it is wrong. Ideological ethics.
-
All on the same day, notice how quickly the primitives went from being high that the House passed BBB to angry that the Rittenhouse trial didn’t go their way? And then given the option to be happy or angry, they decide to focus on being angry.
Not surprising.
.
-
All on the same day, notice how quickly the primitives went from being high that the House passed BBB to angry that the Rittenhouse trial didn’t go their way? And then given the option to be happy or angry, they decide to focus on being angry.
Not surprising.
.
Nor surprising at all. After W was elected The DUmp came into existence for the sole purpose of being angry.
-
The jury heard and saw all the evidence. Star Moron Scottie Mom, being a good little DUmmie assiduously avoids seeing and hearing anything that doesn't conform to the Dem Party line particularly, and a Prog worldview generally. So Star Moron Scottie Mom is, by choice, ignorant of that evidence.
-
Nor surprising at all. After W was elected The DUmp came into existence for the sole purpose of being angry.
And miserable, even when not angry, they are miserable.
-
Nor surprising at all. After W was elected The DUmp came into existence for the sole purpose of being angry.
That’s one of the reasons that the DUmp is so amusing to right-thinking people.
-
Nor surprising at all. After W was elected The DUmp came into existence for the sole purpose of being angry.
Angry and paranoid.
-
The jury heard and saw all the evidence. Star Moron Scottie Mom, being a good little DUmmie assiduously avoids seeing and hearing anything that doesn't conform to the Dem Party line particularly, and a Prog worldview generally. So Star Moron Scottie Mom is, by choice, ignorant of that evidence.
It's called "I see the evidence but I don't believe my lying eyes."
-
All on the same day, notice how quickly the primitives went from being high that the House passed BBB to angry that the Rittenhouse trial didn’t go their way? And then given the option to be happy or angry, they decide to focus on being angry.
Not surprising.
.
Indeed.
All they focus on are things that make them angry, rather than things that make them happy.
It's part of why most of them hate Thanksgiving so much, because they resent the concept of showing gratitude for the good things they have rather than grousing over what they don't have, and that concept is at the root of Thanksgiving.
Gratitude is truly an alien concept to them.
-
All on the same day, notice how quickly the primitives went from being high that the House passed BBB to angry that the Rittenhouse trial didn’t go their way? And then given the option to be happy or angry, they decide to focus on being angry.
Not surprising.
.
They are always angry.
-
Nor surprising at all. After W was elected The DUmp came into existence for the sole purpose of being angry.
They really are nothing more than children that have refused to grow up and throw temper tantrums anytime life doesn't go their way. :cheersmate:
-
Star Member Bettie (12,231 posts)
35. And the victims were supporting people who weren't white
protesting the shooting of a black man.
To white supremacists, the worst crime of all is standing up for those who aren't white...being a 'race traitor'.
The fact that they were white was the ONLY reason there was even a trial.
Okay. I admit that I haven’t been studying the DUmmies as much as I used to so I’m out of touch. Can someone please explain how, even with DUmmie logic, burning down a business owned by Indians is “standing up for those who aren't white”. And why would a “white supremacist” be protecting a business owned by Indians?
-
They really are nothing more than children that have refused to grow up and throw temper tantrums anytime life doesn't go their way. :cheersmate:
That describes almost every Democrat including those in congress.