The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Texacon on April 16, 2021, 02:19:07 PM
-
https://upload.democraticunderground.com/100215340331
albacore
I was driving to the dentist to get my teeth cleaned today...
...and turned my local AM rightwing radio to see what's up with the nutballs.
Couldn't stand it for more than about a minute, but during that time, the local screamer said:
1) Masks are ineffective. Several times. A hundred years of data says so.
2) The vaccines are ineffective and dangerous... a plot to make money for Big Pharma.
3) The Covid body count is inflated. Maybe 100,000 dead, but probably not even that many.
4) This whole pandemic response is just a worldwide attempt at controlling people. and taking their freedom.
5) We can't trust ANYthing the government tells us about this whole thing. Especially Dr. Fauci. He's making money from the vaccines.
My question: At what point does "free speech" become "yelling fire in a crowded theater"? At what point does this kind of damaging mis-information become too much for our country to bear?
LOL a minute ...
KC
-
Negative bouncies. Only reiterates the leftist narrative.
:diebouncy:
-
My question: At what point does "free speech" become "yelling fire in a crowded theater"? At what point does this kind of damaging mis-information become too much for our country to bear?
You tell me....
U.S. Intel Walks Back Claim Russians Put Bounties on American Troops (http://{https://www.thedailybeast.com/us-intel-walks-back-claim-russians-put-bounties-on-american-troops{url})
and who pray tell was this "local screamer" was so we can confirm what they said to use audio and quotes to disprove their rants? :rotf:
-
My question: At what point does "free speech" become "yelling fire in a crowded theater"?
When it goes against your left wing communist / socialist/ fascist agenda. :loser: :loser: :loser: :bird: :bird: :bird:
-
At what point does "free speech" become "yelling fire in a crowded theater"? At what point does this kind of damaging mis-information become too much for our country to bear?
That has never been used in a case about free speech. It was a toss off comment in Schenck v. United States which was about espionage and overturned in 1969.
But if they want to play the "no Amendment is absolute" game, I say we open up discussions about the 13th, 17th and 19th Amendments.