The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dutch508 on August 29, 2008, 10:03:35 AM

Title: DU on Palin:
Post by: dutch508 on August 29, 2008, 10:03:35 AM
Quote
Franks Wild Years (328 posts)      Fri Aug-29-08 10:57 AM
Original message
McCain & Palin - The Rookie Ticket
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6808367

Wow, only 27 and a half years of experience? That's pretty ****ing lame in comparison to Obama - Biden.
 


The Skammer speaks:

Quote
Skinner ADMIN  (1000+ posts)       Fri Aug-29-08 10:57 AM
Original message
Some thoughts on the selection of Sarah Palin as McCain's VP.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6808360

I am going to admit that before this morning I knew nothing about Alaska Governor Sarah Palin. So I think it is safe to say that the average American voter probably knows less than nothing. I think it is probably also safe to say that the average media moron knows slightly more than nothing about Sarah Palin -- but not much. Which means the next 24 hours will be critical for both campaigns to define who this person is in the shared media consciousness. I trust that the Obama campaign saw her selection as a possibility, and have thoroughly prepared for it. I'll be very interested to hear their reaction.

Until then, I'll have to rely on the Sarah Palin Wikipedia page to fill in my gaping lack of knowlege. Here are my initial reactions...

Speaking only for myself, I think the motivation for this selection is obvious: McCain believes that distancing himself from Bush and playing up his maverick credentials are his *only* path to victory in November. Sarah Palin became governor by defeating a corrupt and disgraced Republican incumbent in the GOP primary. This plays into McCain's campaign narrative as the "original maverick" who is willing to buck the Republican party establishment.

But the selection of Palin is not without huge risks for McCain. My impression is that there are two ways to read this turn of events, and both of them are not good for McCain:

1. The selection of Palin shows that McCain's "experience" argument is not gaining any traction with voters, because this is a change year in which the mood is strongly anti-GOP. This is a good sign for us. My impression has been that one of Barack Obama's biggest weaknesses is his relative lack of experience: Only four years in the U.S. Senate. By selecting Sarah Palin -- a 44-year-old former beauty queen with less than two (count 'em) two years of statewide political experience -- McCain is undercutting what many see as his strongest argument against Obama (a 47-year-old with four years of statewide experience). Whenever the McCain campaign tries to attack Obama as inexperienced, our side can simply respond that McCain's own VP is younger and less experienced -- and only a 72-year-old heartbeat away from the presidency. The McCain campaign is not stupid. They know that this selection undercuts their experience argument. Which leads me to my second point about this selection:

2. The McCain campaign knows that they are doing much worse than anyone thinks, and they know that they had to make a "hail-Mary" pass on their VP selection. That's what this selection is. They knew they would be screwed if they picked another crusty white male in their 50s or 60s. They had to make a splash with their selection -- even if it means undercutting their strongest argument against their opponent. Take a risk. Shake things up. She's young! She's attractive! She's Dan Quayle in a dress!

I suspect that there was some calculation that selecting a woman for the ticket would motivate some Democratic women who supported Senator Clinton during the primaries. Personally, I find it hard to believe that supporters of Senator Clinton would be moved by this pick. Palin is an anti-choice former beauty queen -- she has none of the experience, depth, or gravitas that Senator Clinton has. In fact, I think this selection is an insult to women who supported Senator Clinton. McCain thinks they are stupid, and that selecting any woman would be enough to win their support. It doesn't matter who it is -- as long as she has ovaries.




Quote
PeterU  (1000+ posts)       Fri Aug-29-08 10:58 AM
Original message
McCain did what Obama wisely did not. 
 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6808380

And that is pander.

Nothing against Kathleen Sebelius, but if Obama had picked her as VP, it would have come off as an attempt to pander to women, as if "Well, she's not Hillary, but she's a woman, so vote for us on that fact." And it wouldn't have worked.

If McCain thinks that this is going to pull supposedly angry women Hillary voters (who don't exist after this convention) to his side, he's a fool.


Quote
SoonerPride  (1000+ posts)      Fri Aug-29-08 10:58 AM
Original message
If he wanted a female, why didn't he choose Kay Bailey Hutchinson?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6808382

I don't get this pick.

At all.

Palin?

Seriously?

"I'm John McCain and I'm voting for Barack Obama."

 The heads, they are es'plodin'...

Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: Lord Undies on August 29, 2008, 10:20:52 AM
Didn't that big-ear democrat candidate give some sort of talk last night?  I can't find a thing about it. 
Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on August 29, 2008, 10:25:11 AM
Didn't that big-ear democrat candidate give some sort of talk last night?  I can't find a thing about it. 
In other words: he who lasts laugh laughs best.   :evillaugh:
Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: USA4ME on August 29, 2008, 10:25:15 AM
Well, no one ever made a valid argument that $kimmer understands politics.

.
Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: BannedFromDU on August 29, 2008, 10:34:37 AM
Didn't that big-ear democrat candidate give some sort of talk last night?  I can't find a thing about it. 

    Allow me to recap: hope...change...hoping change...changing hope...hoping change hopes...changing hope changes...
Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: Toastedturningtidelegs on August 29, 2008, 10:37:28 AM
Quote
Skinner ADMIN  (1000+ posts)       Fri Aug-29-08 10:57 AM
Original message
Some thoughts on the selection of Sarah Palin as McCain's VP.
http://www.democraticunde...l&address=132x6808360

I am going to admit that before this morning I knew nothing about Alaska Governor Sarah Palin. So I think it is safe to say that the average American voter probably knows less than nothing. I think it is probably also safe to say that the average media moron knows slightly more than nothing about Sarah Palin -- but not much. Which means the next 24 hours will be critical for both campaigns to define who this person is in the shared media consciousness. I trust that the Obama campaign saw her selection as a possibility, and have thoroughly prepared for it. I'll be very interested to hear their reaction.

Until then, I'll have to rely on the Sarah Palin Wikipedia page to fill in my gaping lack of knowlege
. Here are my initial reactions...

Speaking only for myself, I think the motivation for this selection is obvious: McCain believes that distancing himself from Bush and playing up his maverick credentials are his *only* path to victory in November. Sarah Palin became governor by defeating a corrupt and disgraced Republican incumbent in the GOP primary. This plays into McCain's campaign narrative as the "original maverick" who is willing to buck the Republican party establishment.

But the selection of Palin is not without huge risks for McCain. My impression is that there are two ways to read this turn of events, and both of them are not good for McCain:

1. The selection of Palin shows that McCain's "experience" argument is not gaining any traction with voters, because this is a change year in which the mood is strongly anti-GOP. This is a good sign for us. My impression has been that one of Barack Obama's biggest weaknesses is his relative lack of experience: Only four years in the U.S. Senate. By selecting Sarah Palin -- a 44-year-old former beauty queen with less than two (count 'em) two years of statewide political experience -- McCain is undercutting what many see as his strongest argument against Obama (a 47-year-old with four years of statewide experience). Whenever the McCain campaign tries to attack Obama as inexperienced, our side can simply respond that McCain's own VP is younger and less experienced -- and only a 72-year-old heartbeat away from the presidency. The McCain campaign is not stupid. They know that this selection undercuts their experience argument. Which leads me to my second point about this selection:

2. The McCain campaign knows that they are doing much worse than anyone thinks, and they know that they had to make a "hail-Mary" pass on their VP selection. That's what this selection is. They knew they would be screwed if they picked another crusty white male in their 50s or 60s. They had to make a splash with their selection -- even if it means undercutting their strongest argument against their opponent. Take a risk. Shake things up. She's young! She's attractive! She's Dan Quayle in a dress!

I suspect that there was some calculation that selecting a woman for the ticket would motivate some Democratic women who supported Senator Clinton during the primaries. Personally, I find it hard to believe that supporters of Senator Clinton would be moved by this pick. Palin is an anti-choice former beauty queen -- she has none of the experience, depth, or gravitas that Senator Clinton has. In fact, I think this selection is an insult to women who supported Senator Clinton. McCain thinks they are stupid, and that selecting any woman would be enough to win their support. It doesn't matter who it is -- as long as she has ovaries.
Someone's putting on a brave face! :-)
Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: Carl on August 29, 2008, 10:37:47 AM
Quote
I am going to admit that before this morning I knew nothing about Alaska Governor Sarah Palin. So I think it is safe to say that the average American voter probably knows less than nothing.

Pat yourself on the back much skammer?

The person that oversees a website loaded with demented and raging looneys really shouldn`t consider himself a political genius.

Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: BlueStateSaint on August 29, 2008, 10:41:55 AM
When her name was being discussed on Fox & Friends this morning, Bob Beckel had a look on his face that my wife described as:  If Palin's the pick, we are screwed.  We as in "the Democrats."
Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: franksolich on August 29, 2008, 10:45:07 AM
Wow.

I wasn't aware my fellow alum knew how to whistle.

whistle whistle chirp chirp tweet tweet chirrup chirrup
Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: BlueStateSaint on August 29, 2008, 10:49:53 AM
Wow.

I wasn't aware my fellow alum knew how to whistle.

whistle whistle chirp chirp tweet tweet chirrup chirrup

All to keep the corpses in the graveyard, right, Coach?
Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: Rebel on August 29, 2008, 10:58:59 AM
Boortz just said she had the highest approval rating of any governor in the United States. About 90%. She's also a mother of 4, a sportsman, a lifetime member of the NRA, and is married to a native Athabaskan (maybe one of the others like Inuet or Aleut).  :-)

Did I mention she was hot as hell?

She took the "historical election" card off of Obama's plate.
Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: jtyangel on August 29, 2008, 11:02:13 AM
Boortz just said she had the highest approval rating of any governor in the United States. About 90%. She's also a mother of 4, a sportsman, a lifetime member of the NRA, and is married to a native Athabaskan (maybe one of the others like Inuet or Aleut).  :-)

Did I mention she was hot as hell?

She took the "historical election" card off of Obama's plate.

She's actually a mother to 5. Her 5th, a son with down syndrome, was born in April of this year.
Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: Bondai on August 29, 2008, 11:11:50 AM
$kammer knows shit about politics, he is just as dumb as the morons he leads. :mental:
Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: Rebel on August 29, 2008, 11:20:33 AM
McCain AND Palin will have children in the US Armed Forces. Palin's son it either in Iraq, or heading to Iraq.
Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: jukin on August 29, 2008, 11:23:32 AM
The diapers are full over at the DUmp.
Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: Chris_ on August 29, 2008, 11:27:10 AM
The diapers are full over at the DUmp.
...meaning DUmmies heads are once again empty.
Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: Lauri on August 29, 2008, 11:48:52 AM
Didn't that big-ear democrat candidate give some sort of talk last night?  I can't find a thing about it. 


and after McCain gave Obama a congratulatory comment on his speech last night.. these DUmmies are asshats.

too bad Palin is so damn photogenic as well  :lmao:
Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: GOBUCKS on August 29, 2008, 11:49:35 AM
Hunts, fishes, lifetime NRA member, son deploying to Iraq, husband a United Steelworkers member and professional fisherman (Deadliest Catch?), more executive branch experience than the Obamessiah (pbuh), filing suit to allow drilling in ANWR, rejected fed funds for Bridge To Nowhere...and a babe to boot (she will vindicate pantsuits once and for all). She is talking about the 18 million Hillbots who were crapped on by B. Hussein (pbuh).

She appears to be the democrats' worst nightmare. If I were a DUmpmonkey, I would not be happy at  all. For two years they have been talking about nothing but "change". Now they have to live with the comparison between Plugs Biden, a 36-year dem hack, and this impressive lady.
Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: Lauri on August 29, 2008, 11:52:35 AM
she's also a hockey mom and her husband is pretty good looking as well. and all those kids are just darling.. everybody loves babies and kids in the White House.

I am just stunned that McCain stole Obama's thunder so enormously - this is just excellent  :-)
Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: FlaGator on August 29, 2008, 11:56:43 AM
What is that sound I hear? A loud whistling noise coming from the direction of the grave yard.
Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: delilahmused on August 29, 2008, 12:04:45 PM
Oh the best irony of all is that the Obama campaign is highlighting her "lack of experience" as a reason to NOT vote for McCain. Just goes to show you Obama isn't any brighter than the DUmp monkeys...he's just a DUmmie with a Harvard education and an empty suit.

Cindie
Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: Chris on August 29, 2008, 12:35:31 PM
How much experience do you need to be VP?
It's not like she's running for President.  :popcorn:
Title: Re: DU on Palin:
Post by: franksolich on August 29, 2008, 01:16:53 PM
I am just stunned that McCain stole Obama's thunder so enormously - this is just excellent.

There's probably going to be more, so sit back, relax, and enjoy.

Remember all that I said earlier about McCain.....and nobody was paying attention.

Number one, what he learned as prisoner of war; no point in jumping the gun, just wait and wait and wait until the time is exactly right (i.e., pertaining to his not doing anything).

Number two, he's a traditionalist; political campaigns used to start after Labor Day, and there's no evidence that longer campaigns help one (in fact, people tend to get tired of them), and so there's no point in running around campaigning and raising money too early; it just burns one out.

Number three, Marshall Zhukov just 60 miles east of Berlin.

I think I've gotten McCain figured out better than I thought I did.