The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Ralph Wiggum on August 27, 2008, 10:31:35 AM

Title: Questioning whether Chelsea Clinton has had work done is a bannable offense
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on August 27, 2008, 10:31:35 AM
I don't see why there is anything wrong with this question.  She went from a very homely teen to a rather attractive young adult.  Of course, this is DU.  If you asked the same question about the Bush daughters, it would be fair game.  :whatever:

In any event, this poster started THIS THREAD (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6771203#6771570)

Quote
miles 2 go  (368 posts)
Wed Aug-27-08 10:19 AM
Original message
Has Chelsea Clinton had any "work" done?
   
I was trying to get a good look at her last night but they didn't stay on her long enough. She was a bit awkward as a young girl but has grown into a bit of a swan I think. I was just wondering if it had been a natural swanning or if she had any help with it.

Anyone know?

Please post any good up close pics you may have of her. I would like to get a good look at her.

Not trying to start a flame, just inquiring minds and all. I am very glad that she swanned. I hope all of the people that made fun of her are looking at her now and feeling pretty foolish.

Which was locked and got him the tombstone, but not before he got to say his goodbyes, in a thread that has already been scrubbed, so no link:

Quote
miles 2 go (368 posts)
Wed Aug-27-08 10:53 AM
Original message
That's it. I'm out of here.

Not that I expect any of you to care and I'm sure there will be a lot of "don't let the door hit you in the ass"

But, the others were right. You people are ****ed up.

I asked if Chelsea had any work done. Wasn't trying to insult her. I was just wondering. And IT'S so NOT appropriate to ask a question like that. Bullshit. I've been here for 4 ****ing years. I've seen what you people talk about.

Kiss my ass.

You people just look for a reason to fight.

There are too many other sites that have all the info anyone needs on this election and what we can do to get this country back.. No one has to put up with your bullshit. How many others have left? Hundreds? THousands? You people need to get over yourselves.

Really, you do.
Title: Re: Questioning whether Chelsea Clinton has had work done is a bannable offense
Post by: USA4ME on August 27, 2008, 10:38:00 AM
The thread was locked by none other than Skin's himself.  He's been rather testy lately.

.
Title: Re: Questioning whether Chelsea Clinton has had work done is a bannable offense
Post by: BannedFromDU on August 27, 2008, 10:49:00 AM
The thread was locked by none other than Skin's himself.  He's been rather testy lately.

.


     Let's see...why would $kimmer be testy...hmm....he wants to be politically relevant, so he grows a website. BUT the website is fed by about 5,000 people, 80% of whom are an embarrassment to the CLEARLY centrist $kimmer. He WANTS to be taken seriously, but he also needs to feed his two fetuses at home, so he needs the donations of the crazy. But the donations of the crazy keep him marginal...they keep the Democratic party holding him at arm's length with a scowl on their face, as though he's a shitty diaper.

     Remember: David Allen, a/k/a Skinner of Democratic Underground, LLC, is happy to permit scores of threads that ridicule the pain of children, so long as those children belong to people like Rick Santorum. He permits those threads because they are made by people who pay his bills and feed his children. David Allen draws the line, however, when it comes to legitimate questions about an adult child of a Democrat.

     **** you, David Allen. Enjoy your place in the Democratic party, which is currently somewhere lodged between the butt cheeks of Markos Moulitsas. You let insane people pay your livelihood. Choke on it.
Title: Re: Questioning whether Chelsea Clinton has had work done is a bannable offense
Post by: Carl on August 27, 2008, 10:52:41 AM
The thread was locked by none other than Skin's himself.  He's been rather testy lately.

.


     Let's see...why would $kimmer be testy...hmm....he wants to be politically relevant, so he grows a website. BUT the website is fed by about 5,000 people, 80% of whom are an embarrassment to the CLEARLY centrist $kimmer. He WANTS to be taken seriously, but he also needs to feed his two fetuses at home, so he needs the donations of the crazy. But the donations of the crazy keep him marginal...they keep the Democratic party holding him at arm's length with a scowl on their face, as though he's a shitty diaper.

     Remember: David Allen, a/k/a Skinner of Democratic Underground, LLC, is happy to permit scores of threads that ridicule the pain of children, so long as those children belong to people like Rick Santorum. He permits those threads because they are made by people who pay his bills and feed his children. David Allen draws the line, however, when it comes to legitimate questions about an adult child of a Democrat.

     **** you, David Allen. Enjoy your place in the Democratic party, which is currently somewhere lodged between the butt cheeks of Markos Moulitsas. You let insane people pay your livelihood. Choke on it.

I think "whore" may be the appropriate term for him.
Title: Re: Questioning whether Chelsea Clinton has had work done is a bannable offense
Post by: GOBUCKS on August 27, 2008, 11:27:00 AM
Chelsea probably went under the knife to have some of her more obvious Hubbellesque features modified. Didn't work. Slap a wig on Web today, and you will see Chelsea at age 60.
Title: Re: Questioning whether Chelsea Clinton has had work done is a bannable offense
Post by: Chris_ on August 27, 2008, 11:31:27 AM
Here's the "swan":

*spork alert*






















(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b293/aggie8387/chelseapimp.jpg)
Title: Re: Questioning whether Chelsea Clinton has had work done is a bannable offense
Post by: thundley4 on August 27, 2008, 11:32:06 AM
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v675/thundley4/SCARY.jpg)
Title: Re: Questioning whether Chelsea Clinton has had work done is a bannable offense
Post by: JohnnyReb on August 27, 2008, 12:02:57 PM
Chelsea probably went under the knife to have some of her more obvious Hubbellesque features modified. Didn't work. Slap a wig on Web today, and you will see Chelsea at age 60.

Somebody had to do her, Bill wasn't.
Title: Re: Questioning whether Chelsea Clinton has had work done is a bannable offense
Post by: Crazy Horse on August 27, 2008, 05:29:40 PM
 :hitit:
Title: Re: Questioning whether Chelsea Clinton has had work done is a bannable offense
Post by: rich_t on August 28, 2008, 12:39:15 AM
:hitit:

Maybe if I was drunk enough.
Title: Re: Questioning whether Chelsea Clinton has had work done is a bannable offense
Post by: dandi on August 28, 2008, 10:01:30 AM

the Democratic party holding him at arm's length with a scowl on their face, as though he's a shitty diaper.

I think that is probably the best description of skimmer that I have ever heard.  Well done, sir.   :bow: