The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: franksolich on July 08, 2018, 12:17:40 AM
-
The top headline on Drudge this evening is a link to a story in a newspaper in New York City alleging Hillary Clinton is going to run for the Democrat nomination for the presidency in 2020.
In case one's not sure, she'll be seventy-four years old.
However, one has to keep in mind that the hoary old white-haired sourassed sourpuss crank from Vermont is about five years older than her, and thus far none of the gimme crowd has expressed any concern about his age.
Anyway, I'm in for Hillary two years hence.
Well, sort of--I fully expect to continue a lifetime of voting the R ticket, and fully expect to vote for the R candidate for the presidency that year. However, that does not preclude one from helping someone get selected in another political party, as I and some, uh, others did in 2016.
No one knows what his personal future holds, and like everybody else, I might, or might not, be around in 2020, but best to always live as if one's days are without number.
I plan to support Hillary Clinton because she needs another chance to get something she should've gotten a long time ago. There currently exists no Democrat anywhere who has worked harder, given more, done more, for the Democrat party than Hillary Clinton.
Good deeds shouldn't be punished (although they usually are); they need rewarded.
She was rudely elbowed out of the Democrat nomination in 2008 by a pompous arrogant new kid on the block still wet behind the ears and retarded in the brain. She did get the nomination eight years later, in 2016, but it was disgraceful that she had to cheat to get it.
It was a very good thing for America and for humanity, that she knew how to cheat, and was willing to cheat. One still wakes up in the middle of the night, in a cold sweat and the spine tingling, when thinking what could've been, but through the mercy of God was not.
It's still almost two years before the presidential primaries begin, but I think as a matter of honor and respect and gratitude the Democrat party forbid any other Democrat from running for the nomination, and by acclamation give her the nomination--right now, today.
It'd save everybody a lot of money and stuff, too, not having the spend on a campaign, and the Democrat party is not exactly awash in lucre.
-
Honestly, I hope a house falls on her before then, and someone steals the damn' ruby slippers off her feet before Fauxahontas shows up demanding them.
-
Honestly, I hope a house falls on her before then, and someone steals the damn' ruby slippers off her feet before Fauxahontas shows up demanding them.
Et tu, Kamala?
-
Et tu, Kamala?
Exactly what I was thinking. H5.
-
She could run with bernie, the slogan could be "Free Depends For Every one"
-
She could run with bernie, the slogan could be "Free Depends For Every one"
clinton/sanders: "All Depends on us."
-
She could run with bernie, the slogan could be "Free Depends on Every one"
fify
-
She has her work cut out for her. If she wants to be ready when 2020 rolls around, she had better get started on stair work now.
https://www.livestrong.com/article/464931-what-does-stair-climbing-do-for-your-body/
-
.
You know, sir, if the Democrats lose the presidential race in 2020, they'll have only themselves to blame, because they didn't nominate their worthiest candidate.
In fact, the field of possible Democrat candidates looks pretty barren, and so perhaps the Democrat party should prohibit other Democrats from running for the office, leaving it for her. I still think she needs to be nominated right now, today, and by enthusiastic acclamation.
And because she'll have a two-year head-start on campaigning, and because there wouldn't be any expensive primary battles, she wouldn't have to worry about raising money and competing with other Democrats. She could focus totally on campaigning against President Trump, no other distractions.
-
Hey Shoeless Joe, I know you read this. This is I, not somebody copying me.
In case anyone's wondering, I'm conducting an experiment on DU Jr., to see what's the best way of handling primitives who insult and denigrate and belittle.
About half of them, I continue responding to, the other half I ignore, betraying no reaction at all. (I don't have them on ignore, as I need to read their comments; I just ignore them.)
Thus far the experiment, which is still recent, has been, to put it mildly, inconclusive.
Shoeless Joe's in the half that I ignore, don't react to, and he's upset.
I have no idea why, because Shoeless Joe's typical of the crowd over there, disdainful and aloof and thinks he's smarter than any of us.
I've coined a term for this sort of primitive: the lorgnette-and-pearls crowd.
-
You know, sir, if the Democrats lose the presidential race in 2020, they'll have only themselves to blame, because they didn't nominate their worthiest candidate.
In fact, the field of possible Democrat candidates looks pretty barren, and so perhaps the Democrat party should prohibit other Democrats from running for the office, leaving it for her. I still think she needs to be nominated right now, today, and by enthusiastic acclamation.
And because she'll have a two-year head-start on campaigning, and because there wouldn't be any expensive primary battles, she wouldn't have to worry about raising money and competing with other Democrats. She could focus totally on campaigning against President Trump, no other distractions.
Actually if they lose again it will still be the fault of the Russians and the Macedonian internet farmers.
Clinton is following in the shoes of Fidel Castro, staying in power even after death. She is looking for attention as she is the biggest attention whore ever , and she also wants to raise $$$ for more cheap chablis.