The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: CC27 on February 09, 2018, 11:02:53 AM

Title: It doesn't have to be a general that leads a military coup. Kentuck
Post by: CC27 on February 09, 2018, 11:02:53 AM

Quote

Star Member kentuck (84,489 posts)


It doesn't have to be a general that leads a military coup.

It could be someone working very closely with the generals.

A good start for a military "coup" is a large military "parade", where the military is put on a pedestal and glorified by the "Leader". Who would dare criticize them after such a display of appreciation?

As of last count, there has not been a lot of resistance from the leaders of our military. They are making plans to go forward.

Definitely something we should keep our eyes on and to be vigilant about.

Nothing is impossible in these times.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100210208768

We are go again with the dreaming of the Military taking Trump out of office or DUmmies storming the White House to remove him. Get a hobby asshole.

Title: Re: It doesn't have to be a general that leads a military coup. Kentuck
Post by: BlueStateSaint on February 09, 2018, 11:04:10 AM

Obviously, mental masturbation needs to come off ol' Kentuck's list. :jerkit:

Title: Re: It doesn't have to be a general that leads a military coup. Kentuck
Post by: BadCat on February 09, 2018, 11:17:16 AM

I think Ken****ed is thinking the military may stage a coup and install DJT as "Supreme Leader" and start rounding up and hanging his "opponents".
He's afraid.

Title: Re: It doesn't have to be a general that leads a military coup. Kentuck
Post by: FlaGator on February 09, 2018, 12:01:58 PM

If the military goes to all the trouble to attempt a coup and manage to pull it off, I doubt they will be turning power over to the Dems. Expect a Military Junta to assume control, Libs. Also, you can probably expect to be labeled as traitors for supporting illegal alien rights over citizen rights.

Title: Re: It doesn't have to be a general that leads a military coup. Kentuck
Post by: SVPete on February 09, 2018, 12:56:23 PM

kt's mushroom consumption obviously isn't limited to cremini, portabello, and shiitake.

Title: Re: It doesn't have to be a general that leads a military coup. Kentuck
Post by: FiddyBeowulf on February 09, 2018, 01:22:27 PM

Quote from: SVPete on February 09, 2018, 12:56:23 PM

kt's mushroom consumption obviously isn't limited to cremini, portabello, and shiitake.

He should just stick to huffing spray paint.

Title: Re: It doesn't have to be a general that leads a military coup. Kentuck
Post by: USA4ME on February 10, 2018, 09:40:43 AM

Quote from: BadCat on February 09, 2018, 11:17:16 AM

I think Ken****ed is thinking the military may stage a coup and install DJT as "Supreme Leader" and start rounding up and hanging his "opponents".
He's afraid.

Agree.

Just remember bluegrass primitive, just like "It doesn't have to be a general that leads a military coup", it's also true that is doesn't take a military coup to find and hang you.

.

Title: Re: It doesn't have to be a general that leads a military coup. Kentuck
Post by: Old n Grumpy on February 10, 2018, 10:19:58 AM

Rumor has it Gomer Pyle is organizing the KP duty section to pull of the coup. :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Title: Re: It doesn't have to be a general that leads a military coup. Kentuck
Post by: Airwolf on February 10, 2018, 06:19:54 PM

What a mental case.