The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: CC27 on October 11, 2017, 09:17:23 AM

Title: CNN you ****ing hacks - name one ReTHUG who condemned. malaise
Post by: CC27 on October 11, 2017, 09:17:23 AM
Quote
malaise (163,346 posts)

CNN you ****ing hacks - name one ReTHUG who condemned


Roger Ailes or Bill O'Reilly or **** off!

Here's Groper Don the Con on Ailes versus Obama on Weinstein
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029697781

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029698111

She is gone overboard with her bat shit crazy talk.
Title: Re: CNN you ****ing hacks - name one ReTHUG who condemned. malaise
Post by: SVPete on October 11, 2017, 10:28:34 AM
mal seems desperate to deflect from the Weinstein story. I wonder why. I don't think she's his type.

I know the MSM have lied about what Trump actually said about @#$%^ grabbing (he did not say he had done it). Several women accused Trump of having done it, but their stories fell apart with cursory fact-checking.

As for Ailes and O'R, have those accusation been fact-checked? I'm sure they were condemned by some Rs and conservatives who didn't wait for verification, but that the accusations faded away so quickly suggests to me that that accusations are unverified or disproved (or both).

mal and Progs should fear the Weinstein exposure. It's like lancing a pus-filled boil on the ass of a bacteria colony. The "casting couch" has been intrinsic to Hollywood since the nascent movie industry discovered it had lots of sunshine and land. For all Hollyweird's Lib/Prog pretensions, that never ceased. If the exposure of Hollyweird's hypocrisy continues it could constrain the D Party's ATM machine's capacity.
Title: Re: CNN you ****ing hacks - name one ReTHUG who condemned. malaise
Post by: lastparker on October 11, 2017, 10:35:31 AM
I am (not) shocked at the liberal silence about this Harvey Weinstein business. The Dump is preparing to go into full apologist mode, and the usual outraged liberal screamers on social media are stunningly silent.

And SHAME on Jolie and Paltrow for not speaking up about this when it happened, or at least as soon as they were successful enough to withstand the backlash. Hell – they were both protected by famous parents – they could have stopped him long ago.

****ing hypocrites.
Title: Re: CNN you ****ing hacks - name one ReTHUG who condemned. malaise
Post by: franksolich on October 11, 2017, 10:38:31 AM
mal seems desperate.....

I think that subconsciously she wants to win the top prize of the Top Ten DUmmies of 2017.....and the more nonsense she spouts, she just may accomplish that.
Title: Re: CNN you ****ing hacks - name one ReTHUG who condemned. malaise
Post by: USA4ME on October 11, 2017, 11:17:37 AM
I am (not) shocked at the liberal silence about this Harvey Weinstein business. The Dump is preparing to go into full apologist mode, and the usual outraged liberal screamers on social media are stunningly silent.

And SHAME on Jolie and Paltrow for not speaking up about this when it happened, or at least as soon as they were successful enough to withstand the backlash. Hell – they were both protected by famous parents – they could have stopped him long ago.

****ing hypocrites.

I agree.

You got a big lib who spouted off about women's rights and was a big supporter of abortion and Planned Parenthood who used his power and position to grope and molest women. You got big lib actresses who spout off about how they're feminist who stayed silent for years knowing if he was doing it to them that he was doing it to others. And then you have many, many libs saying his behavior was a big open secret in Hollywood.

It's a bunch of big and not-so-big name libs being the exact opposite of who they claim they are and what they support. IOW, typical libs. Quite frankly, Weinstein was a monster that liberal ideology created. I have no sympathy for any of them, including the "victims" (unless they were underage).

.
Title: Re: CNN you ****ing hacks - name one ReTHUG who condemned. malaise
Post by: Ogre on October 11, 2017, 11:28:15 AM
Dear Mal

One, Weinstein is a major Democrat donor, not a Republican donor so no need for condemnation by them.

Two, Weinstein has been documented as a prominent benefactor to the likes of Cankles, Barry Big Ears, and the former First Wookie, not with any Republican.

Three, you had better dust of that ****y-hat, march, and demand any Democrat that benefited from the perv's fundraising be purged from the party, because you know if the shoe was on the other foot you would.
Title: Re: CNN you ****ing hacks - name one ReTHUG who condemned. malaise
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on October 11, 2017, 12:01:43 PM
I'm not a "Rethug".  Ralphie is a conservative.  Any sexual predator is pathetic and needs to be held accountable.

Never good enough for you pious libs, but my thoughts.
Title: Re: CNN you ****ing hacks - name one ReTHUG who condemned. malaise
Post by: USA4ME on October 11, 2017, 12:35:25 PM
I'm already seeing these liberal idiots are going to overplay their hand, which is a real shame because I'd like to see a whole bunch of these lib whackos fall from grace.

But, just read the twitter account of Rose McGowen, and this chick is as stupid as they get. She had someone bring up the very valid point of asking (paraphrased) "Why did all of you wait so long? You've been big power stars for years now, but said nothing. Why did you make the decision not to report it? Weinstein's past case against him never happened because a lot of you never went forward."

Her answer back was the standard "How dare you try to shame the victims!" liberal non-sense. She is losing momentum with this type of immature answer, and she's definitely not bright enough to see it.

Hate to break the news to you, Rose, but it's a legitimate question and deserves a better answer than "I was scared of what might happen" and/or "It would have meant being victimized again and still not have people believe me." You say that junk and you're just rationalizing why you didn't do what you should have done. No one's saying it would have been easy, it most definitely would have been extremely difficult. However, law enforcement and the legal system can't help you if you don't report it.

.
Title: Re: CNN you ****ing hacks - name one ReTHUG who condemned. malaise
Post by: Old n Grumpy on October 11, 2017, 12:41:29 PM
The dems are not to upset, this is typical hollyweird behavior. And besides, they are just a bunch of liberal sluts. They chose to polish his knob to climb the ladder of stardom. I have no pity for any of them specially when they spout all their liberal bias and hate.

And I might add he is one ugly mother f**ker!! :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
Title: Re: CNN you ****ing hacks - name one ReTHUG who condemned. malaise
Post by: USA4ME on October 12, 2017, 08:36:29 AM
"Twitter Suspends Rose McGowan's Account"

 http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/twitter-suspends-rose-mcgowans-account-1048018

As I mentioned yesterday two posts up from this one, she is coming off the rails. She's her own worst enemy. I'd like to believe libs could take out some of their own, but they're too incompetent.

.
Title: Re: CNN you ****ing hacks - name one ReTHUG who condemned. malaise
Post by: franksolich on October 12, 2017, 09:18:56 AM
As I mentioned yesterday two posts up from this one, she is coming off the rails. She's her own worst enemy.

Yeah.  She's been so spectacular my guess is she's going to make it into the Top DUmmies of 2017.

Probably not the top one, but surely in the top three.
Title: Re: CNN you ****ing hacks - name one ReTHUG who condemned. malaise
Post by: USA4ME on October 12, 2017, 09:51:02 AM
Yeah.  She's been so spectacular my guess is she's going to make it into the Top DUmmies of 2017.

Probably not the top one, but surely in the top three.

I was talking about Rose McGowen, but Catherine is just as kooky.

.