The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dutch508 on October 09, 2017, 10:26:07 PM
-
Star Member helpisontheway (1,777 posts) https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029692912
Obama and Weinstein
I wonder why President Obama and Hillary did not comment on this situation. Especially since it seems like all of this is true. Someone mentioned that Malia worked for him. I think it would bother me even more if my daughter was around the man.
Well, for one thing- it takes Barry three days to say anything on anything...
Hillary doesn't want to give the money back. If she said anything the first questions would be about doing that...
Star Member Skittles (115,416 posts)
1. how about repukes comment on taking money from the NRA
how about that
:whatever:
Star Member Hekate (45,099 posts)
7. The entire GOP leadership
I wonder why they don't comment on the Russian takeover of our 2016 election and future election apparatus. Someone mentioned that Trump's daughter is besties with Putin's girlfriend.
THIS is what bothers ME.
It's excellent news that Weinstein is out on his ass. But honestly? In the grand scheme of things I do not give a good gods damn about it compared to the Russian invasion. I think Obama and Hillary would be well-advised to not bring up Weinstein -- just something short for when they are asked, period.
::)
Star Member still_one (54,251 posts)
9. Bullshit. Amazing how CNN and much of the MSM are trying to setup their false eqivalency bullshit
Did the press even ask them, and are we to assume from the media because they haven't come out they approve of it? What a perfect example of shoddy journalism
:mental:
bettyellen (44,041 posts)
14. RW propaganda - gee thanks!
:lol:
-
I have found the double standards interesting. No doubt if this were a conservative the news stories and how it's being presented would be different. Conservatives always get treated worse by the media than liberals. The media and Hollywood libs protect their own. Even Weinstein is getting the silk glove treatment while the media is trying to convince us all that he's really getting hammered.
But as far as what he did; whacko liberal Hollywood film financier treating whacko liberal Hollywood actresses like his sexual playthings? Meh. Don't care. They all deserve each other.
.
-
Star Member helpisontheway (1,777 posts) https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029692912
Obama and Weinstein
I wonder why President Obama and Hillary did not comment on this situation. Especially since it seems like all of this is true. Someone mentioned that Malia worked for him. I think it would bother me even more if my daughter was around the man.
They have hundreds of thousands of reasons, maybe millions ...
Star Member Skittles (115,416 posts)
1. how about repukes comment on taking money from the NRA
how about that
The NRA and its activities are legal. They're just one of your bogeymen. Weinstein's were tortious and illegal.
Star Member Hekate (45,099 posts)
7. The entire GOP leadership
I wonder why they don't comment on the Russian takeover of our 2016 election and future election apparatus. ...
The reason is simple. It did not happen. There is zero evidence of even one vote being flipped or cast for Trump by the Russians. OTOH, there's those hundreds of ballots multi-cast in Detroit. What are the odds they were all for HilLIARy?
bettyellen (44,041 posts)
14. RW propaganda - gee thanks!
When the truth is your enemy ...
-
I have found the double standards interesting. No doubt if this were a conservative the news stories and how it's being presented would be different. Conservatives always get treated worse by the media than liberals. The media and Hollywood libs protect their own. Even Weinstein is getting the silk glove treatment while the media is trying to convince us all that he's really getting hammered.
But as far as what he did; whacko liberal Hollywood film financier treating whacko liberal Hollywood actresses like his sexual playthings? Meh. Don't care. They all deserve each other.
.
Had Weinstein contributed to Rs every R to whom he had contributed would have had "reporters" in their faces within seconds demanding to know why they haven't returned every penny to him, with compound interest.
-
Post removed
Post removed
(https://i.imgflip.com/1xcs4t.jpg) (https://imgflip.com/i/1xcs4t)via Imgflip Meme Generator (https://imgflip.com/memegenerator)
-
Had Weinstein contributed to Rs every R to whom he had contributed would have had "reporters" in their faces within seconds demanding to know why they haven't returned every penny to him, with compound interest.
The DNC took the bold stance of donating the monies Weinstein gave them to other left wing groups.
A group that actually had a conscience would have donated that money to women's shelters, rape prevention or something along those lines.
-
(https://i.imgflip.com/1xcs4t.jpg) (https://imgflip.com/i/1xcs4t)via Imgflip Meme Generator (https://imgflip.com/memegenerator)
Some junior Mod is probably cleaning and polishing the banhammer as I type. :-) :popcorn:
-
How about we nationalize the Hollywood film industry and make films by bi-partisan commission. No more casting couch rapes, rampant pedophilia, or other leftists interference. And no more money for the American Communist Agenda (the REAL ACA)
-
How about we nationalize the Hollywood film industry and make films by bi-partisan commission. No more casting couch rapes, rampant pedophilia, or other leftists interference. And no more money for the American Communist Agenda (the REAL ACA)
Hollyweird would be so bureaucratized and tangled in regulatory red tape that no films would be produced. Which sounds pretty good, frankly.
In my semi-caffeinated state earlier this AM I forgot the biggest reason HilLIARy cannot (or at least should not) say a peep about Weinstein: her decades of enabling Bill's serial adultery, sexual assaults, and (probably) rape(s). In her current weakened state - political power, not physical health - it would not just be Rs and conservatives howling about her hypocrisy.
-
Star Member helpisontheway (1,777 posts) https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029692912
Obama and Weinstein
I wonder why President Obama and Hillary did not comment on this situation. Especially since it seems like all of this is true. Someone mentioned that Malia worked for him. I think it would bother me even more if my daughter was around the man.
barry is waiting to hear about it on the news, and clintons giving back money? BWAAAAAHHAAA :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
This guy is a big time dem donor, part of the hollyweird perverts club. As long as the $$$ keeps flowing he could do a massacre and walk away from it. And they still can't let got of Trumps remark.
-
The media and Hollywood libs protect their own. Even Weinstein is getting the silk glove treatment while the media is trying to convince us all that he's really getting hammered.
They always have. Look at the kid gloves they treated Roman Polanski with, and how rampant child molestation is in Hollywood.
-
Rumor has it that Bill Clinton can't wait to get together with weinstein to hear all about it in detail! :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
-
Rumor has it that Bill Clinton can't wait to get together with weinstein to hear all about it in detail! :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
Coming soon, a new production company, "BJC Productions, Inc."
-
HilLIARy must've decided the PR cost of remaining silent outweighed the risk of her hypocrisy being thrown in her face. So she issued a three sentence statement (http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/10/politics/hillary-clinton-harvey-weinstein/index.html) through a spokesmuffin that she was, "shocked and appalled to learn ...". It smacks of being the perfect token - gets her name onto to the list of condemners without being likely to stimulate hypocrisy call-outs from anyone other than conservatives and some Rs. I see in the article that BHO also finally commented. It's just four sentences, but it's fuller and more balanced than HilLIARy's ME!-tainted statement.
The wind must've been obstructed by all those fingers poked into it.
-
Hiliary has to be careful, the guy may still have a few bucks left to donate and bill wants his little black book and to get invited to his parties :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
-
They always have. Look at the kid gloves they treated Roman Polanski with, and how rampant child molestation is in Hollywood.
@Movie buff
Look at the way they STILL treat him like royalty. They even had a big gala event for him while Bathhouse Barry was in the WH,calling for him to be pardoned "so he can come back to Hollywood and make some great movies." What people need to realize is that the entertainment crowd all parrot the "company line" about equality,save the chill-runs,conservatives are evil,etc,etc,etc,but when push comes to shove the ONLY things that have any real meanings for them is power and wealth. The fact that Polanski drugged and raped a 13 year old girl is irrelevant because if he comes back he might provide high-paying jobs for them. If push came to shove,there is not a single one of them that wouldn't pimp out their grandparents or grandchildren to come up with the money to buy him a pardon if they knew for a fact he would make them a part of his next movie,and give them "points".
They are the ultimate whores.
-
Matt Damon and Russell Crowe helped kill earlier New York Times expose about Harvey Weinstein, writer says
http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/10/09/matt-damon-and-russell-crowe-helped-kill-earlier-new-york-times-expose-about-harvey-weinstein/
As a follow-up to its explosive story about the alleged sexual harassment exploits of Harvey Weinstein, The New York Times published a column Saturday that lambasted the movie mogul’s “enablers” in Hollywood and in the media.
By never holding Weinstein accountable, these enablers helped Weinstein stay in power, thereby abiding behavior that has no “rightful place in society,” writer Jim Rutenberg said.
Hollywood is crooked to the core.
-
From Ptarm's link:
Or that’s an almost direct paraphrase from Sharon Waxman. She’s an an entertainment writer for The Wrap, who penned an essay Sunday in which she said she had been working on a Weinstein expose for the New York Times all the way back in 2004.
But The Times gutted it, Waxman said, after Weinstein used his clout with the paper to get her to stop reporting on him — and with the help of two powerful male stars who presumably were Friends of Harvey, Matt Damon and Russell Crowe.
The Murky Skews is not in the same league as the NYT or WashPost, but it's reliably Lib-prog. This is an admission against interest or an attempt to get aboard the story for CYA purposes. The Murk is big enough and connected enough that it knew enough about Weinstein 10 or 20 years ago to know there was a HUGE blockbuster story waiting to be covered. But movie advertising ... but Democrat Party connections ... . The Murk has been a part of the problem, just not as large as the NYT or NBC or Weinstein's actor-enablers or the "victims" who didn't speak out even after they were secure enough to weather any attempts to damage their careers.