The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: FunkyZero on July 09, 2017, 02:39:56 PM
-
I just HAD to bring over the latest flavoring of Grahamcracker wisdom. it's morphed into how Bernie would have won had he ran as a republican.
hahahh man this is just.. I don't even know if I should laugh or be shocked at the level of stupid on display here
https://www.discussionist.com/10151395435#post18 (https://www.discussionist.com/10151395435#post18)
If Donald Trump had run on the Democratic party line- he would have easily lost in a landslide
there is no way 80% of the party would have voted for him
(same as 80% of the party did not vote for Bernie but the Democratic party was nice enough to let him run).
Bernie on the other hand MIGHT have won the Republican nomination had he run as a Republican
(but there is no way they would have let him run)
but in no way, no how would the Democratic party have nominated nor vote for Donald Trump
the Democratic party votes for causes not for personalities.
sorry, but the politico article is just pro-Trump spin.
this sorry excuse for an article
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/07/08/what-if-trump-had-won-as-a-democrat-215351
-
The graham cracker's schtick is getting old.
He needs to go back to posting on that one message board dominated by air-headed pre-teenaged girls.
-
Seeing that the presidents following Barack, according to the cracker, was to be Hiltlery, Moochelle, Chelsea Clinton, Malia, and Sasha, it's a little tough to put much stock into whatever that nutso says about anything.
.
-
the Democratic party votes for causes not for personalities.
I can see how you might think that, given that what tiny personality Hitlery had was all vile and horrible, but it really isn't true in the general case.
-
the Democratic party votes for causes not for personalities.
Barack Obama - charisma
Bill - Clinton - "charming rogue"
JFK - youthful charisma
What was Carter's "cause"? Carter's big selling point was being an outsider, "I am not WashDC!"
Even LBJ's selling point in 1964 was continuing JFK's legacy. Ditto Truman in 1948
The last D POTUS who ran on a "cause" was FDR and The Great Depression (which he helped prolong, not intentionally).
-
I can see how you might think that, given that what tiny personality Hitlery had was all vile and horrible, but it really isn't true in the general case.
The CHILL ran on neither personality nor a cause. Her messages were, "I am not Trump!" and "I am not a Republican." She failed to give voters not motivated by partisanship a reason to vote FOR her.
-
The CHILL ran on neither personality nor a cause. Her messages were, "I am not Trump!" and "I am not a Republican." She failed to give voters not motivated by partisanship a reason to vote FOR her.
There was one other message--"I'm a woman!"
-
There was one other message--"I'm a woman!"
You forgot " because I deserve it"
The idiot forgot Bernie did not win a primary and his followers were a minority looking for more free shit. Thinking a socialist could win is insane. :mental: :mental: :mental:
-
There was one other message--"I'm a woman!"
The jokes all but write themselves ... :bolt: :bolt: :bolt: :bolt: :bolt:
-
The cracker boy clearly has mental issues. He needs to get some help.
-
Between him,Swifty and a couple others the IQ of the those might get to double digits combined
-
Between him,Swifty and a couple others the IQ of the those might get to double digits combined
Yeah, another one I'm sure has some sort of mental deficiency is the Little Red Machine. It's like talking to an 11 year old with maturity problems.
-
Between him,Swifty and a couple others the IQ of the those might get to double digits combined
Add it the one that calls itself "Argentina" and I think it'll fall back into negative territory