The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: franksolich on August 13, 2008, 03:52:53 PM
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3789247
Oh my.
Paint It Black (1000+ posts) Wed Aug-13-08 12:30 PM
Original message
Thanks a ****ing lot Pelosi, for not impeaching this mother-****er when you had the chance!
The illegal war against Iraq wasn't enough.
Threatening Iran wasn't enough.
Now that you've enabled and emboldened * and his pals, he's taking on RUSSIA.
Happy now?
I dunno. franksolich is pretty happy.
yibbehobba (1000+ posts) Wed Aug-13-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ya, I'm sure Cheney wouldn't have gone after Russia.
Paint It Black (1000+ posts) Wed Aug-13-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. They should have both been impeached and removed
But I suppose that would have meant Pelosi would have taken over as President, and maybe she just doesn't want that? Who knows...
boloboffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Aug-13-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Pelosi and Byrd would probably have recused themselves from the succession.
Leaving Condoleezza Rice the President, someone that would be in the perfect position to run against Hillary or Barack.
Wasn't going to happen.
The stupidest person on the whole entire internet chimes in:
sfexpat2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Aug-13-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is exactly the kind of incident I was afraid of in the last months of this misAdministration.
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Aug-13-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Blah Blah Blah
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Aug-13-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. That Chance Was When?
Oh yeah... that's right... NEVER.
Quit your dreamin already. In real life no such chance has ever existed.
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Aug-13-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I'm sorry, but reality is not allowed in this thread
Paint It Black (1000+ posts) Wed Aug-13-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. Only because we never let it exist
If the repugs were able to impeach Clinton over lying about a ****ing blowjob, we sure as hell should have been able to impeach over lying to start a war, killing thousands of American soldiers and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis.
Why couldn't the Democrats have gone after * and his cabal as ferociously as the repukes went after Clinton?
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Aug-13-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Wake Up.
You're still dreaming.
The dems could've done whatever they wanted. Bush would still be in office, just like Clinton was still in office.
If you'd like to remain in your false unrealistic idealistic bubble, I can't stop you.
An optimistic primitive:
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Aug-13-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
33. It's not too late. He's got 5 months left for his shenanigans.
-
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Aug-13-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I'm sorry, but reality is not allowed in this thread
Quote
Paint It Black (1000+ posts) Wed Aug-13-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. Only because we never let it exist
Yup! Heavy bong use and a diet of Cheetos and tofu dogs will do that to you.
Sucks now does it not?
-
The illegal <repeat a lie often enough...> war against Iraq wasn't enough.
Threatening Iran wasn't enough.
Sometimes the truth sneaks in and they don't even know it.
-
Nancy "responds" in another thread...
sabra (1000+ posts) Wed Aug-13-08 11:03 AM
Original message
Nancy Pelosi: "You can't impeach a president because you disagree with his policies"
http://www.marinij.com/marinnews/ci_10185801
<snip>
"I don't agree that it's a good idea to impeach the president unless we have a real case against him," Pelsoi said, when asked by the Marin Independent Journal about the criticism during a reception that preceded her talk. "You can't impeach a president because you disagree with his policies. You have to have some high crimes and misdemeanors."
Regarding the effort to cut off spending for the war in Iraq, Pelosi said, "We just couldn't get the votes in the Senate. The House over and over again sent bills to end the war in a finite time and a date certain but couldn't get it past the 60 votes in the Senate. When we have a Democratic president, that will change."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3788514
Nothing new under the sun in this thread. :yawn:
-
The illegal <repeat a lie often enough...> war against Iraq wasn't enough.
Threatening Iran wasn't enough.
Sometimes the truth sneaks in and they don't even know it.
:lmao:
Gud-un...
-
Paint It Black (1000+ posts) Wed Aug-13-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. Only because we never let it exist
If the repugs were able to impeach Clinton over lying about a ******* blowjob, we sure as hell should have been able to impeach over lying to start a war, killing thousands of American soldiers and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis.
Why couldn't the Democrats have gone after * and his cabal as ferociously as the repukes went after Clinton?
Newsflash for you DUmmy....you are a joke to us and a boil on the backside of dem Congress people.
They consider you all an embarrasment and just as crazy as we do.
The only difference between them and us......they will bs you to take your money for campaign contibutions. :-)