The Conservative Cave
Current Events => Politics => Topic started by: HAPPY2BME on March 05, 2017, 12:06:24 PM
-
Democrats’ efforts to raise suspicions about alleged — and, thus far, imaginary — links between President Donald Trump’s campaign and the Russian government may have backfired spectacularly.
The spotlight is now on President Barack Obama and his administration’s alleged surveillance of the Trump campaign, as well as his aides’ reported efforts to spread damaging information about Trump throughout government agencies to facilitate later investigations and, possibly, leaks to the media.
All day Saturday, former Obama staffers tried to put out the fires. A spokesperson for President Obama responded — and Obama aide Valerie Jarrett tweeted:
“A cardinal rule of the Obama Administration was that no White House official ever interfered with any independent investigation led by the Department of Justice.”
Note that this sentence does not dispute any of the key factual allegations at issue: that the DOJ approached the FISA court for permission to spy on Trump aides; that surveillance, once granted, continued after no evidence was found of wrongdoing; that the Obama administration relaxed National Security Agency rules to facilitate the dissemination of evidence through the government; and that Obama staffers allegedly did so, the better to leak damaging (and partial) information to the media.
In addition, there is reason to doubt the claim that the White House never “interfered”: the New York Times reported in January that “intelligence reports based on some of the wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House.”
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/05/deepstategate-obama-trump-surveillance-fisa-investigation-russia/
-
Intercepted Russian Communications Part of Inquiry Into Trump Associates
By MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT, MATTHEW ROSENBERG, ADAM GOLDMAN and MATT APUZZO JAN. 19, 2017
One official said intelligence reports based on some of the wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/19/us/politics/trump-russia-associates-investigation.html?_r=0
That was Obama's white house.
So there you have it, Obama WAS getting wiretapped information.
-
I hope all the the (D)'s involved end up in jail, for a very very long time.
And any Rino's that may have been involved with the spying too.
-
I hope all the the (D)'s involved end up in jail, for a very very long time.
And any Rino's that may have been involved with the spying too.
================================
Let me name the MF'ers for you please:
John McCain
Lindsey Graham
Paul Ryan
Mitch McConnell
-
================================
Let me name the MF'ers for you please:
John McCain
Lindsey Graham
Paul Ryan
Mitch McConnell
Paul Ryan confirmed the wiretaps to Bret Baier on Friday evening, and said that no information tying the Trump campaign to anything illegal with Russian agents had been discovered.
-
Paul Ryan confirmed the wiretaps to Bret Baier on Friday evening, and said that no information tying the Trump campaign to anything illegal with Russian agents had been discovered.
================
Paul Ryan Dodges Questions About Obama Wiretapping Trump
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kehBUCLpPIs[/youtube]
-
================
Paul Ryan Dodges Questions About Obama Wiretapping Trump
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kehBUCLpPIs[/youtube]
Do you actually listen to the conversations on these? Go to the 4:20 mark and listen to 4:51. Baier sets up the question, and the very first word out of Ryan's mouth confirms the wiretaps!
Plus, anyone with more than two functioning brain cells would be able to figure out how Ryan connected those dots. He's privy to everything the Intelligence Committee sees, as the Speaker.
-
(Even the #NeverTrump Club is claiming another 'WaterGate.' Levin HATES Donald Trump. What is his motive now?)
============
Mark Levin on Trump Wiretapping Claims: ‘The Evidence Is Overwhelming’
Levin said, “Well, a pleasure to be here. The evidence is overwhelming. This is not about President Trump’s tweeting. This is about the Obama administration spying, and the question is not whether it spied. We know they went to the FISA court twice. The question is who they did spy on and the extent of the spying that is the Trump campaign, the Trump transition, Trump surrogates.”
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/03/05/mark-levin-breaks-trump-wiretapping-claims/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social
-
I think it would be useful to go to Levin's video and find the exact stories on the left-wing sources that he obtained them from. Then throw that into the collective faces of the Left.