The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: franksolich on January 17, 2017, 10:58:56 PM

Title: Jugs being grouchy, hard to get along with
Post by: franksolich on January 17, 2017, 10:58:56 PM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028484587

Oh my.

Quote
BainsBane (39,079 posts)     Tue Jan 17, 2017, 03:30 AM

More than 40 Democratic lawmakers now skipping Trumps inauguration-- look whose name is missing
 
Here is the list. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2017/01/16/more-than-30-democratic-lawmakers-now-skipping-trumps-inauguration/?utm_term=.9c19a171b2cd

One name I don't see on there is Bernie Sanders. There are other sources saying he does plan to attend. https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=Sanders+inauguration

What's up with that? How do the DUers who pilloried Hillary for agreeing to attend feel about that?

My own view on the subject remains unchanged. I really wish Hillary would not attend, and I don't understand why she feels compelled to do so. As for Sanders, I'm not surprised. I wonder, however, if some of his most ardent supporters are, particularly those who were so critical of Clinton's decision? 

Quote
FreakinDJ (17,640 posts)     Tue Jan 17, 2017, 03:38 AM

2. Bernie will be the Thorn in his side
 
And will get lots of press doing so too 

Quote
BainsBane (39,079 posts)      Tue Jan 17, 2017, 03:42 AM

3. Oh, publicity
 
that makes it alright then. What did you have to say about Clinton's attending? 

Quote
uhnope (6,369 posts)     Tue Jan 17, 2017, 05:23 AM

27. Do Sanders haters really think he just wants publicity?
 
That he worked in Congress quietly and effectively for years, but is suddenly motivated by personal fame? Is that the BS that supposedly progressive detractors are actually alleging?

Quote
BainsBane (39,079 posts)      Tue Jan 17, 2017, 05:49 AM
response to the primitive immediately above

29. You will note
 
that FreakingDJ suggested the importance of publicity. Take it up with him. 

Quote
tecelote (3,630 posts)      Tue Jan 17, 2017, 05:59 AM

31. He's getting a lot of publicity lately.
 
Maybe if he had significant publicity when he was running. We'd have a Democrat in office now.

Good to see someone who had been campaigning so hard continue the fight.

Too bad he and Hillary are attending the inauguration. It legitimizes it. If Bernie skipped, it would be no big deal. But here's Hillary's chance to say this election was stolen but... status quo. 

Quote
BainsBane (39,079 posts)      Tue Jan 17, 2017, 06:14 AM

35. I know
 
It sucks only being the politician with the second highest number of TV appearances in the country.
If the press did it's job, it would have covered him and only him 24/7.

It's good to see you are at least honest about maintaining a blatant double standard.

Quote
tecelote (3,630 posts)      Tue Jan 17, 2017, 06:38 AM

36. I like Bernie and Hillary.
 
There's my double standard for you.

Quote
BainsBane (39,079 posts)      Tue Jan 17, 2017, 08:31 AM

43. And the media coverage of Hillary?
 
Any thoughts on that? 

Quote
Gothmog (35,039 posts)      Tue Jan 17, 2017, 03:17 PM

84. Is Hillary out selling another book?
 
Sanders is on a book tour

Quote
Gothmog (35,039 posts)      Tue Jan 17, 2017, 11:59 AM

67. Bernie will not give up his book sales to boycott the inauguration

Quote
NanceGreggs (22,026 posts)      Tue Jan 17, 2017, 03:54 AM

4. Gotta get out and meet-and-greet.
 
Those books aren't going to sell themselves.

Quote
BainsBane (39,079 posts)      Tue Jan 17, 2017, 03:56 AM

5. True
 
and apparently, according to another poster in this thread, he needs the publicity. 

Quote
melman (1,744 posts)      Tue Jan 17, 2017, 04:09 AM

11. Raging against Bernie in the wee hours
 
Again. 

Quote
BainsBane (39,079 posts)      Tue Jan 17, 2017, 04:12 AM
response to the primitive immediately above

13. My, you are easily offended
 
What precisely constitutes "raging" in my OP?

Quote
NCTraveler (21,198 posts)      Tue Jan 17, 2017, 06:41 AM

37. No clue how one would get to the thought of "rage"
 
Reading your op. 

Quote
BainsBane (39,079 posts)      Tue Jan 17, 2017, 08:28 AM

42. I take it as an indication
 
That any view other than absolute adulation is unacceptable. 

Quote
ProfessorGAC (28,662 posts)     Tue Jan 17, 2017, 03:07 PM

82. And I Take That As An Indication. . .
 
. . .that any view other than absolute denigration is unacceptable.

Is there no middle ground?

Quote
Post removed

Quote
BainsBane (39,079 posts)      Tue Jan 17, 2017, 06:12 AM
response to post that was removed, immediately above

34. How is it that people feel compelled to inform me
 
on what I myself wrote about in the OP, almost as if two dozen words were too much to read?

How about you? Are you looking forward to the festivities?

http://jackpineradicals.com/boards/topic/rec-if-youre-not-going-to-vote-for-hillary/ 

And on and on it goes; this is a pretty long thread, much squibble-squabbling, the primitives wiggle-waggling their armpits at each other.
Title: Re: Jugs being grouchy, hard to get along with
Post by: franksolich on January 17, 2017, 11:08:22 PM
By the way, I may have given the wrong impression, but it's late, it's cold, and I'm grouchy myself.

On this matter specifically, franksolich considers himself in 100% accordance with Jugs; her presidential candidate should've been the Democrat nominee back in 2008, but was rudely shoved aside by male chauvinist pigs afraid of strong, confident women and giggly-gaggly primitives all aflutter about having a "black" (quotation marks intentional) president.

And then this past year the male chauvinist pigs and the gimme-gimmie-gimme crowd tried to deny her again, and almost succeeded. 

<<<doesn't blame Jugs the least for feeling bitter.
Title: Re: Jugs being grouchy, hard to get along with
Post by: Big Dog on January 17, 2017, 11:11:10 PM
franksolich,

PhDD is irritable, grouchy, and needful.

Needful.

You know what needs to be done.

(http://gifsec.com/wp-content/uploads/GIF/2014/05/GIF-Smack-that-ass.gif?gs=a)

Title: Re: Jugs being grouchy, hard to get along with
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on January 18, 2017, 12:24:58 AM
Perpetually butt-hurt and tone deaf Dems.  Figures.
Title: Re: Jugs being grouchy, hard to get along with
Post by: CollectivismMustDie on January 18, 2017, 12:28:28 AM
franksolich,

PhDD is irritable, grouchy, and needful.

Needful.

You know what needs to be done.

(http://gifsec.com/wp-content/uploads/GIF/2014/05/GIF-Smack-that-ass.gif?gs=a)

How did old Doug get a pass on that?

 :lmao:


CMD
Title: Re: Jugs being grouchy, hard to get along with
Post by: Adam Wood on January 18, 2017, 12:49:07 AM
Quote
FreakinDJ (17,640 posts)     Tue Jan 17, 2017, 03:38 AM

2. Bernie will be the Thorn in his side
 
And will get lots of press doing so too 
This is just DUlusional.  Nobody pays one whit of attention to the opposition party Senators during the inauguration.  Bernie may get a soundbite in on BSDNC and maybe someone at the WaPo will give him a one-sentence quote, but no one really lends any credence to this.

What nonsense.
Title: Re: Jugs being grouchy, hard to get along with
Post by: Carl on January 18, 2017, 04:42:50 AM
What a miserable scrunt.
Title: Re: Jugs being grouchy, hard to get along with
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on January 18, 2017, 05:24:20 AM
How did old Doug get a pass on that?

 :lmao:


CMD
You know she likes it.
Title: Re: Jugs being grouchy, hard to get along with
Post by: SVPete on January 18, 2017, 07:27:18 AM
Every D member of the House and Senate could stay home for all I care. It's not like there'd be any surprise in their so doing. IRL, of course, I think Sen. Manchin of WV would attend. And IRL, I don't think Trump cares. about their futile tantrumming gesture, either.
Title: Re: Jugs being grouchy, hard to get along with
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on January 18, 2017, 08:57:46 AM
The Hillary thing is pretty simple, DU idiots.  It's more important for her to stay connected to the power brokers  than to cater to your impotent temper tantrums.  If she stays on the good side of the power people, she gets put on top of the pile and you tools will line up like a set of magnetic wrenches.
Title: Re: Jugs being grouchy, hard to get along with
Post by: franksolich on January 18, 2017, 09:49:04 AM
PhDD is irritable, grouchy, and needful.

Seriously though, I don't blame her for being bitchy.

The election of Messalina Agrippina in either 2008 or 2016 would have resulted in unmitigable disaster for America and Americans--although surely no worse than what we've endured under Obozo--but I'm looking at this from her side, attempting to empathize with how she feels.

<<<does whatever it takes, to get along with people.

She got screwed, and it'd be unnatural of her not to be resentful.

She got screwed in 2008 when the Democrats, liberals, and primitives got attracted by this flashy new toy, a "black" man, and chose him instead of her. 

And then she nearly got screwed in the earlier part of 2016, when the gimme crowd almost succeeded in getting that grouchy old sourassed sourpuss the Democrat nomination, but she dodged that bullet, a bullet she shouldn't have ever had to deal with in the first place.

She did however get screwed in that while Messalina Agrippina finally got that long-delayed honor due her a very long time ago, her candidate was so old and frail and ill she couldn't possibly survive the rigors of a four-year, much less an eight-year, presidency.  (I'm still convinced she's going to keel over before Bill does.)

If I'd been screwed as much as Jugs has, I'd be a bitch too.
Title: Re: Jugs being grouchy, hard to get along with
Post by: Skul on January 18, 2017, 10:52:11 AM
If Jugs  :yahoo: had a rash  of poison ivy, she'd be a C/W song. (Itchy Bitchy Twat )
Title: Re: Jugs being grouchy, hard to get along with
Post by: BlueStateSaint on January 18, 2017, 12:01:24 PM
If Jugs  :yahoo: had a rash  of poison ivy, she'd be a C/W song. (Itchy Bitchy Twat )

 :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

H5 given!
Title: Re: Jugs being grouchy, hard to get along with
Post by: thundley4 on January 18, 2017, 12:50:10 PM
Quote
NanceGreggs (22,026 posts)      Tue Jan 17, 2017, 03:54 AM

4. Gotta get out and meet-and-greet.
 
Those books aren't going to sell themselves.

Shouldn't Bernie be giving his book away for free?
Title: Re: Jugs being grouchy, hard to get along with
Post by: Adam Wood on January 18, 2017, 12:51:40 PM
If Jugs  :yahoo: had a rash  of poison ivy, she'd be a C/W song. (Itchy Bitchy Twat )
If anyone needs me, I'll be in the shed out back finding an icepick to shove into my mind's ear, since I will apparently never, ever get the sound of Billy Ray Cyrus singing "itchy bitchy twat" out of my head.
Title: Re: Jugs being grouchy, hard to get along with
Post by: Carl on January 18, 2017, 02:34:43 PM
The Hillary thing is pretty simple, DU idiots.  It's more important for her to stay connected to the power brokers  than to cater to your impotent temper tantrums.  If she stays on the good side of the power people, she gets put on top of the pile and you tools will line up like a set of magnetic wrenches.

Little Ms Hubble will be the focal point to keep the money flowing.
Title: Re: Jugs being grouchy, hard to get along with
Post by: jukin on January 18, 2017, 02:41:22 PM
She like most of the beasts on the DUmp could use a good rodgering but I wouldn't use my worst enemy's dick to do that.
Title: Re: Jugs being grouchy, hard to get along with
Post by: CollectivismMustDie on January 18, 2017, 04:16:21 PM
She like most of the beasts on the DUmp could use a good rodgering but I wouldn't use my worst enemy's dick to do that.

That would be some not very jolly rodgering.

 :whistling:


CMD
Title: Re: Jugs being grouchy, hard to get along with
Post by: Adam Wood on January 18, 2017, 04:21:47 PM
That would be some not very jolly rodgering.

 :whistling:


CMD
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: