The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: DUmpDiver on January 09, 2017, 01:40:43 PM
-
RadiationTherapy (5,709 posts)
Hillary Clinton and her entire family are extremely wealthy, white, mostly hetero, and connected.
If she is not a revolutionary personality, why would she participate in trying to resist Trump or the corporate-dominant nature of America, 2016? If she is no longer running for office, what motivation would she have to lead a revolution against wealth inequality, racism, and other social justice issues?
People keep asking "where is Hillary?" in regards to politics and social justice, but I am not sure I see her stepping out and leading a revolution. It is my opinion that only a very revolutionary personality would step out of such a comfortable set of demographics in order to try and tear down some of their own institutional privilege. Is Hillary such a person? Am I totally missing something significant here?
(yes, I voted for Hillary and dems, etc.)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028450035
No replies yet but this is far to close to the truth for The DUmp to accept.
-
"(yes, I voted for Hillary and dems, etc.)"
This Will Not Save You! MuuuAHAAHAHAHAHA...
-
"mostly hetero"?
-
"mostly hetero"?
Huma was unavailable for confirmation.
-
POST REMOVED, damn it.
-
The revolution (Glorious or otherwise) will not come at the urgings of the primitives/liberals/progressives on behalf of the "underserved". Rather the revolution will come when the tax payers have had enough.
-
Mostly hetero... :lmao: :rotf: I skipped right over that in reading too fast.
-
Does this mean that Hillary is "mostly hetero" in the same fashion as the Michael Brown
riots protests in Ferguson were "mostly peaceful"?
-
TheBlackAdder
2. At first, I thought this leaned as a RW talking point. On reflection, there is legitimacy to this.
Let me help you out here, son.
Can the question being asked in the OP in any conceivable way be twisted and turned in the limited thoughts of the island audience to even be slightly suggesting that Hillary is less than 100% perfect?
If so, then it is a RW talking point. Note the disappearance of the OP as evidence.
.
-
"mostly hetero"?
:lol: Yeah, I liked that.
-
The revolution (Glorious or otherwise) will not come at the urgings of the primitives/liberals/progressives on behalf of the "underserved". Rather the revolution will come when the tax payers have had enough.
Yes, and that's what gives them the cold sweats. After 6 years of ineffective ridicule, government targeted harassment and annual media pronouncements of it's death; the saner of the DemocratMediaIndustrial Complex are admitting that they have lost to the ....
....... Tea Party. That was dead. :tongue:
And they intend to try to emulate that. The (D)Ummies, of course, will poo-poo that idea for all the wrong reasons.