The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: fatboy on January 05, 2017, 09:39:35 AM

Title: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: fatboy on January 05, 2017, 09:39:35 AM
Quote
Wed Jan 4, 2017, 07:48 PM

Star Member cilla4progress (6,016 posts)
I think we're really well-positioned
 
for Warren / Sanders 2020!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512673796

 :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

 :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

one more....

 :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:


Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: DUmpstruck on January 05, 2017, 09:49:23 AM
Bent over and grabbing one's ankles has been the usual position for Democratic voters since Carter was elected.
Fauxcahontas and Methuselah would be a natural fit.  Pun entirely intended.
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: SVPete on January 05, 2017, 11:08:09 AM
Nah, Sanders would be 79. Go for the gusto! Make it Warren-Dolezal!
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: FunkyZero on January 05, 2017, 11:23:36 AM
Quote
Wed Jan 4, 2017, 07:48 PM

Star Member cilla4progress (6,016 posts)
I think we're really well-positioned
 
for Warren / Sanders 2020!

Ok, now that one actually made me chuckle.   ::)
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: Ken8521 on January 05, 2017, 12:01:23 PM
Quote
Persondem (1,323 posts)
14. Non-starter. The country just leaned right (or leaned stupid) either way

pedantic lefties are not the answer.

I do want them to be involved in the national conversation pulling things leftward and shining lights on GOP lunacy (witness Sanders yesterday with Trump's medicare/SS tweet), but they are ill suited to winning a national election.

Besides, Democrats have a tough map in 2018; we need focus and energy on those races or we could be looking at another midterm disaster.

Looks like one of the DUmmies gets it.  Them idiots are so busy looking at 2020, they're completely overlooking what could very well be an impending disaster in 2018.

Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: Gina on January 05, 2017, 12:18:05 PM
After Trump accomplishes the first few things on his list of campaign promises y'all are SOL for at least 8 years then Pence will run bigly!
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: franksolich on January 05, 2017, 01:14:03 PM
Doesn't the Democrat party have anybody of national stature who isn't geriatric?
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: thundley4 on January 05, 2017, 01:16:43 PM
Doesn't the Democrat party have anybody of national stature who isn't geriatric?

Hillary and the DNC screwed the pooch on that one. She could have named some young up and comer as her VEEP and gotten that person in the news. She didn't want to be overshadowed, though.
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: fatboy on January 05, 2017, 01:19:47 PM
The DUmmies have to admit that the Republicans are well-positioned to eliminate any possible Obama legacy!
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: Undies on January 05, 2017, 01:34:03 PM
Doesn't the Democrat party have anybody of national stature who isn't geriatric?

Not really.  Heap Big Crazy Squaw will be 70, and she's about the most viable potential candidate the Idiot Party has to offer.  Their Up & Coming youngsters have been so radicalized and marinaded in Leftists Insanity that no one of any thoughtful maturity will take them seriously.  It's sort of fun to watch the collapse of the empire they thought they had built on such solid ideological quicksand.   
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: franksolich on January 05, 2017, 01:38:36 PM
Not really.  Heap Big Crazy Squaw will be 70, and she's about the most viable potential candidate the Idiot Party has to offer.  Their Up & Coming youngsters have been so radicalized and marinaded in Leftists Insanity that no one of any thoughtful maturity will take them seriously.  It's sort of fun to watch the collapse of the empire they thought they had built on such solid ideological quicksand.

Yeah, talk about not planning ahead.

John Kasich was still an up-and-comer in the House of Representatives the very first time I heard about old age being an issue, an Achilles' heel, for the Democrats, liberals, and primitives.

Think about it.  How long ago was it, that John Kasich was a congressman?

And the Democrats, liberals, and primitives haven't even started to deal with it.
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: BlueStateSaint on January 05, 2017, 01:41:24 PM
Not really.  Heap Big Crazy Squaw will be 70, and she's about the most viable potential candidate the Idiot Party has to offer.  Their Up & Coming youngsters have been so radicalized and marinaded in Leftists Insanity that no one of any thoughtful maturity will take them seriously.  It's sort of fun to watch the collapse of the empire they thought they had built on such solid ideological quicksand.

There is Dandy Andy Cuomo . . . ::) :whatever: :whistling:
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: thundley4 on January 05, 2017, 01:46:20 PM
There is Dandy Andy Cuomo . . . ::) :whatever: :whistling:

Don't forget Julian Castro. He has built in recognition for liberals. :rofl:
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: Undies on January 05, 2017, 01:57:09 PM
There is Dandy Andy Cuomo . . . ::) :whatever: :whistling:

Andrew has more history than future.

Quote
Don't forget Julian Castro. He has built in recognition for liberals.

Young Master Castor has almost no usable political instincts.  He is a clown in the making.
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: Gina on January 05, 2017, 01:58:51 PM
Hillary and the DNC screwed the pooch on that one. She could have named some young up and comer as her VEEP and gotten that person in the news. She didn't want to be overshadowed, though.

I still don't get how they thought Kaine was even remotely a good choice.  :o :lmao: but really  :o :o :o :o :o

(http://newswithviews.com/NWV%20Pictures/Tim%20Kaine.jpg)
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: franksolich on January 05, 2017, 02:08:07 PM
There is Dandy Andy Cuomo . . . ::) :whatever: :whistling:

Cuomo's 59 years old; I'd really hesitate to call that "young and promising."
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: fatboy on January 05, 2017, 02:18:36 PM
Don't forget Julian Castro. He has built in recognition for liberals. :rofl:

Don't forget Sen. Cory Booker who has a long list of accomplishments.  :stoner:
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: docstew on January 05, 2017, 02:37:07 PM
I still don't get how they thought Kaine was even remotely a good choice.  :o :lmao: but really  :o :o :o :o :o

(http://newswithviews.com/NWV%20Pictures/Tim%20Kaine.jpg)

According to the WikiLeaks emails, Kaine's selection as VP was part of the deal of him stepping down as DNC chair for DWS to take over and rig the primary.
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: jb2u11 on January 05, 2017, 03:02:43 PM
My hope is that Hillary runs once again.  The Democrat people will get behind her and she will once again lose miserably. 
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: franksolich on January 05, 2017, 03:16:45 PM
My hope is that Hillary runs once again.  The Democrat people will get behind her and she will once again lose miserably.

I would wish that too, if she were like the old sourassed sourpuss Methuselah.

But she's not; I'll be surprised if she lives long enough.  I think she's in pretty bad shape, even worse shape than Bill.  I suspect it's the destructive effect of all those mood-altering pharmaceuticals she's taken since young womanhood, to stifle, repress, and kill her natural and genetic womanly instincts.

When one goes against nature, one inevitably loses.

As will all the women's-libbers among the primitives.

Wait--although it'll be some years yet--watch, and see if I'm not right.
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: jukin on January 05, 2017, 04:17:57 PM
Don't forget Sen. Cory Booker who has a long list of accomplishments.  :stoner:

1. Black
2. ????
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: SVPete on January 05, 2017, 04:28:10 PM
1. Black
2. ????

Worked for BHO.
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: CollectivismMustDie on January 05, 2017, 04:38:51 PM
Quote
Wed Jan 4, 2017, 07:48 PM

Star Member cilla4progress (6,016 posts)
I think we're really well-positioned
 
for Warren / Sanders 2020!

The only thing you're in a position for, is more disappointment.

The game has changed. Historically. Monumentally. Permanently. You and the other (D)Ummies (with a few exceptions, probably moles) haven't quite wrapped your pea sized brains around that fact, which of course means that it is impossible that you have any idea how the game has changed.

Sorry to dash your hopes but...no...I'm not sorry. **** you (D)Ummie. :bigbird:

Enjoy the left being out of power. I know I will.



CMD
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on January 06, 2017, 08:08:45 AM
I still don't get how they thought Kaine was even remotely a good choice.  :o :lmao: but really  :o :o :o :o :o

(http://newswithviews.com/NWV%20Pictures/Tim%20Kaine.jpg)

You got that from an illustrated dictionary, right next to the word "Creep," didn't you?
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: Big Dog on January 06, 2017, 08:40:26 PM
Doesn't the Democrat party have anybody of national stature who isn't geriatric?

Lena Dunham will constitutionally eligible in 5 years.

(http://media.portable.tv/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/hannah-toilet-portable-lena-dunham-hbo-girls-355x285.png)
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: SVPete on January 07, 2017, 08:03:23 AM
Lena Dunham will constitutionally eligible in 5 years.

(http://media.portable.tv/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/hannah-toilet-portable-lena-dunham-hbo-girls-355x285.png)

Why I oughta ...

 :ashamed: :ashamed: :ashamed: :ashamed: :ashamed:    :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:    :ashamed: :ashamed: :ashamed: :ashamed: :ashamed:

(http://images.wisegeek.com/manatee.jpg)
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: Big Dog on January 07, 2017, 08:06:38 AM
(http://images.wisegeek.com/manatee.jpg)

That would be perfect for a "Sad Manatee" meme!

Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: FunkyZero on January 07, 2017, 08:08:43 AM
Lena Dunham will constitutionally eligible in 5 years.

(http://media.portable.tv/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/hannah-toilet-portable-lena-dunham-hbo-girls-355x285.png)

I always wondered that even if someone tried, if they could possibly skank themselves up any more than she is.
That has to be one of the most vile examples of a female that I've ever seen. Even in my younger days, and in the worst of drunken stupors, could I imagine myself falling into that trap. It truly is gag worthy. It's as if "she" strives to be disgusting.
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: thundley4 on January 07, 2017, 09:57:11 AM
I always wondered that even if someone tried, if they could possibly skank themselves up any more than she is.
That has to be one of the most vile examples of a female that I've ever seen. Even in my younger days, and in the worst of drunken stupors, could I imagine myself falling into that trap. It truly is gag worthy. It's as if "she" strives to be disgusting.

Dunham tried to compare herself to this, http://it.stlawu.edu/~global/glossary/candies.2jmtoilet.jpg or this https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/27/c2/2c/27c22ceaf050589ad68e86f98e9e3269.jpg
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: SVPete on January 07, 2017, 10:23:47 AM
Dunham tried to compare herself to this, http://it.stlawu.edu/~global/glossary/candies.2jmtoilet.jpg or this https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/27/c2/2c/27c22ceaf050589ad68e86f98e9e3269.jpg

Seriously? Dunham's 3 times the woman either of those two blondes are! :-)
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: tuolumnejim on January 07, 2017, 11:22:01 AM
(http://i110.photobucket.com/albums/n104/tuolumnejim/Forum%20stuff/download_zps816dae21.jpg) (http://s110.photobucket.com/user/tuolumnejim/media/Forum%20stuff/download_zps816dae21.jpg.html)

And if the DUmmie is a chick what I would imagine she does.  :-)

(http://i110.photobucket.com/albums/n104/tuolumnejim/Forum%20stuff/IYrEimG_zps6bef7e53.gif) (http://s110.photobucket.com/user/tuolumnejim/media/Forum%20stuff/IYrEimG_zps6bef7e53.gif.html)
Title: Re: cilla4progress: I think we're really well-positioned
Post by: Adam Wood on January 10, 2017, 05:46:27 AM
Well, there's Keith Ellison.





 :rotf:

Sorry.  I tried to keep a straight face.  Couldn't do it.