The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Mr Mannn on December 23, 2016, 11:31:18 AM
-
http://investmentwatchblog.com/clinton-on-the-gqs-list-of-least-influential-people/
Clinton on the GQ’s List of Least Influential People
Hillary Clinton just ended up on a list she, most certainly, didn’t want to be associated with. The former Democratic nominee made the GQ magazine’s list of the least influential people.
The list was compiled by Drew Magary who said he had no choice but to include her in it. He doesn’t, exactly, hate Hillary, he just hates the fact she lost to Donald Trump. This isn’t surprising as most Democrats hate the idea she wasn’t capable of beating the opponent who “had no chance” according to the general public and media favoring Clinton.
Magary wrote: “When you lose an election to Donald Trump, you belong on this list. How do you f*ck that up?? It’s Donald Trump!”
He also added: “Would it have killed you to visit Wisconsin, Hillary? I know it’s full of fat people and bad pretzels, but sometimes you gotta come out of your fundraising hole and kiss some babies. I’ll never get over it.”
Other least influential people are:
Anthony Weiner
Billy Bush
Cameron Crowe
Ryan Lochte
Joe Lacob
Tim Kaine
Peyton Manning
Jonathan Safran-Foer
JK Rowling
Matt Lauer
Gary Johnson
Taylor Swift
Jeb Bush and the Bush Family
David Cameron
Arianna Huffington
Ted Cruz
Interestingly, in 2015 GQ ranked Hillary Clinton the 5th worst person.
http://www.gq.com/story/the-least-influential-people-of-the-year
just a warning. The GQ site is written by flaming liberals.
GQ write up on Hillary Veep,
Tim Kaine
Do we know where he is? Does he still exist? Did he ever exist? Or was he simply an enlarged cutout of a stock photo that Hillary Clinton chose as a running mate because her whole campaign consisted of nothing but tragically safe and conservative choices? I've had dreams that lingered longer than this guy.
-
The list was compiled by Drew Magary who said he had no choice but to include her in it. He doesn’t, exactly, hate Hillary, he just hates the fact she lost to Donald Trump. This isn’t surprising as most Democrats hate the idea she wasn’t capable of beating the opponent who “had no chance” according to the general public and media favoring Clinton.
Magary wrote: “When you lose an election to Donald Trump, you belong on this list. How do you f*ck that up?? It’s Donald Trump!”
He also added: “Would it have killed you to visit Wisconsin, Hillary? I know it’s full of fat people and bad pretzels, but sometimes you gotta come out of your fundraising hole and kiss some babies. I’ll never get over it.”
:rotf: :lmao: :loser: Trump was a vulnerable candidate in many respects. Hillary was a perfect-storm-of-self-destruction candidate, and, as the article pointed out, campaigned very stupidly. :loser: :lmao: :rotf:
-
In all honesty, Obama was less influential than Hillary this year.
-
In all honesty, Obama was less influential than Hillary this year.
True! She had a very powerful influence on this year's Presidential Election outcome! :-)
-
True! She had a very powerful influence on this year's Presidential Election outcome! :-)
Without Hillary being the worst democrat candidate ever, Trump might have lost.
-
Well, I think early on in the primaries, I told my wife I dang near felt sorry for the dimwits this time around. Of their 2 candidates, ones a f*&#*%# cold-war commie and the other is a damned felon. The don't' stand a chance against any on the R lineup.
Of course when Trump won, I got real worried: i figured it was over.
I think we all underestimated just how bad clintoon sucked.
I mean, how bad are you when a guy with outrageous disapproval ratings curb stomps your ass?
-
Well, I think early on in the primaries, I told my wife I dang near felt sorry for the dimwits this time around. Of their 2 candidates, ones a f*&#*%# cold-war commie and the other is a damned felon. The don't' stand a chance against any on the R lineup.
Of course when Trump won, I got real worried: i figured it was over.
I think we all underestimated just how bad clintoon sucked.
I mean, how bad are you when a guy with outrageous disapproval ratings curb stomps your ass?
Remember, those disapproval ratings came from the same MSM that told us cankles had a 12 point lead a week before the election and would win in a landslide the day before the election.
-
Remember, those disapproval ratings came from the same MSM that told us cankles had a 12 point lead a week before the election and would win in a landslide the day before the election.
That was the uncertainty I was feeling at the time (not that it ruled my life or anything like that). That the MSM played games with poll sampling and poll questions is common knowledge among those willing to acknowledge it. But knowing that doesn't give a clue to reality. Adding to the uncertainty is the fact that in the past the MSM usually slid toward reality in their polling just before the election; in 2016 they didn't do that,but that's hindsight.
So I was mildly surprised - and GREATLY relieved - to learn on Wednesday AM after the election that Trump had won.
Had The SHREW-CHILL actually campaigned in WI and consistently campaigned in MI and PA and pretended to give a @#$% about theologically conservative Christians, we might be having very different conversations.
Looking back at 2008, well, a Hades of a lot of what lost Election 2016 had not yet happened - no pay-to-play corruption, no scofflaw email server, no mishandling of highly classified info, no "Arab Spring", Benghazi, and Syrian F-Ups. Add to that McCain and all his baggage (McCain-Feingold, The Gang of 14), I think The SHREW-CHILL could have won in 2008, possibly very handily.
-
That was the uncertainty I was feeling at the time (not that it ruled my life or anything like that). That the MSM played games with poll sampling and poll questions is common knowledge among those willing to acknowledge it. But knowing that doesn't give a clue to reality. Adding to the uncertainty is the fact that in the past the MSM usually slid toward reality in their polling just before the election; in 2016 they didn't do that,but that's hindsight.
So I was mildly surprised - and GREATLY relieved - to learn on Wednesday AM after the election that Trump had won.
Had The SHREW-CHILL actually campaigned in WI and consistently campaigned in MI and PA and pretended to give a @#$% about theologically conservative Christians, we might be having very different conversations.
Looking back at 2008, well, a Hades of a lot of what lost Election 2016 had not yet happened - no pay-to-play corruption, no scofflaw email server, no mishandling of highly classified info, no "Arab Spring", Benghazi, and Syrian F-Ups. Add to that McCain and all his baggage (McCain-Feingold, The Gang of 14), I think The SHREW-CHILL could have won in 2008, possibly very handily.
Yup. Had she run and won in '08, we'd be looking at jugears going for his first term now. 16 years of the B.S.
Just like Carter gave us Reagan, jugears gave us Trump.