The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Carl on December 10, 2016, 10:54:03 AM

Title: A question for lawyers and Constitutional experts on DU.
Post by: Carl on December 10, 2016, 10:54:03 AM: http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512651193

Quote
Sat Dec 10, 2016, 11:26 AM

potone (1,332 posts)

A question for lawyers and Constitutional experts on DU.
I am beyond outraged by the revelations that the Russians manipulated our elections, by the seeming refusal of Republicans in Congress to take it seriously, and by theâ€“so farâ€“limp response of Democrats. It seems to me that this should call into question the legitimacy of Trump's victory in the Electoral College. This is unprecedented foreign interference in our elections, as far as I know. This would be bad in any election, but given what we are facing with a Trump presidency, it is nothing short of disastrous.

But as a practical matter, what can we do? I would like to hear about any legal actions that are possible to overturn the election in light of these revelations. I am all for protest marches, but those alone won't have any legal force.

Constitutional experts at the DUmp?

:rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:

The first weighs in.

Quote
Response to potone (Original post)

Sat Dec 10, 2016, 11:32 AM

Star Member Uponthegears (1,205 posts)
1. There is little under the law

But the suspension of the law in times of national emergency is specifically acknowledged.

Just throw it in the fire is the answer.
Gosh,there is a surprise. ::)
Title: Re: A question for lawyers and Constitutional experts on DU.
Post by: Patriot Guard Rider on December 10, 2016, 11:01:49 AM: It's funny.

The DUmmies have all this proof, yet I don't see any, only wild accusations of Russian interference.

That wouldn't be #FakeNews, would it?
Title: Re: A question for lawyers and Constitutional experts on DU.
Post by: Mr Mannn on December 10, 2016, 11:22:13 AM: The only Russian interference I heard was leaking info to wiki leaks.
A leak is NOT election tampering.

It is not like pouring US tax dollars into an effort to tamper in Israeli elections. THAT was tampering.
Title: Re: A question for lawyers and Constitutional experts on DU.
Post by: docstew on December 10, 2016, 01:25:02 PM: Quote from: Mr Mannn on December 10, 2016, 11:22:13 AM
The only Russian interference I heard was leaking info to wiki leaks.
A leak is NOT election tampering.

It is not like pouring US tax dollars into an effort to tamper in Israeli elections. THAT was tampering.

Or a hack into a state's voter database, that leads back to 0bama's DHS.
Title: Re: A question for lawyers and Constitutional experts on DU.
Post by: Patriot Guard Rider on December 10, 2016, 01:35:25 PM: Quote from: docstew on December 10, 2016, 01:25:02 PM
Or a hack into a state's voter database, that leads back to 0bama's DHS.

Yea. Funny how that isn't a hot topic of conversation in DUmmieland.
Title: Re: A question for lawyers and Constitutional experts on DU.
Post by: Maverick1987 on December 10, 2016, 01:40:58 PM: All this "Russia" madness is just an extension of thier denial...they'll NEVER grasp the legitimate reason(s) they lost this election.
Title: Re: A question for lawyers and Constitutional experts on DU.
Post by: Patriot Guard Rider on December 10, 2016, 01:48:15 PM: Quote from: Maverick1987 on December 10, 2016, 01:40:58 PM
All this "Russia" madness is just an extension of thier denial...they'll NEVER grasp the legitimate reason(s) they lost this election.

Correct and when you try to explain it to them, they stick their fingers in their ears and yell :lalala:

Hey DUmmies, :foff:
Title: Re: A question for lawyers and Constitutional experts on DU.
Post by: jukin on December 10, 2016, 01:49:19 PM: I'm not a lawyer but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express.

1. Make/sign internet petition.
2. Submit internet petition.
3. Wait 24 business hours for reply from republican congress.
Title: Re: A question for lawyers and Constitutional experts on DU.
Post by: Big Dog on December 10, 2016, 01:56:56 PM: Any word from laserass, the Private Attorney General?
Title: Re: A question for lawyers and Constitutional experts on DU.
Post by: Maverick1987 on December 10, 2016, 02:43:54 PM: (https://thebyronicmandotcom2.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/lionel_hutz1.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/TiKWmJ1.jpg)
Title: Re: A question for lawyers and Constitutional experts on DU.
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on December 10, 2016, 03:27:31 PM: Quote from: Big Dog on December 10, 2016, 01:56:56 PM
Any word from laserass, the Private Attorney General?
Get out of my brain!
Title: Re: A question for lawyers and Constitutional experts on DU.
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on December 10, 2016, 03:31:55 PM: Quote from: Maverick1987 on December 10, 2016, 02:43:54 PM
(https://thebyronicmandotcom2.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/lionel_hutz1.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/TiKWmJ1.jpg)
Lionel Hutz is a good choice.

I was thinking Saul Goodman for this particular case.

https://youtu.be/pPd67CEL54E
Title: Re: A question for lawyers and Constitutional experts on DU.
Post by: Maverick1987 on December 10, 2016, 04:02:44 PM: Quote from: Ralph Wiggum on December 10, 2016, 03:31:55 PM

I was thinking Saul Goodman for this particular case.

https://youtu.be/pPd67CEL54E

The Hoboken Squat Cobbler :rotf:
Title: Re: A question for lawyers and Constitutional experts on DU.
Post by: Doc Savage on December 10, 2016, 04:37:49 PM: Quote from: Carl on December 10, 2016, 10:54:03 AM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512651193

Constitutional experts at the DUmp?

:rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:

Just like sea lawyers

The first weighs in.

Just throw it in the fire is the answer.
Gosh,there is a surprise. ::)
Title: Re: A question for lawyers and Constitutional experts on DU.
Post by: miskie on December 10, 2016, 04:57:18 PM: Yes, because Putin clearly hacked hundreds of different makes and models of voting machines, in thousands of wards across many states to elect someone who will actually put up resistance against him, instead of rolling over like a Liberal -

Except California -

He left all those voting machines alone to show Hillary actually 'won' to poke Democrats in the eye.. Instead of lowering California margins to a loss for Trump, but a slight one.

Great Scott ! How did I not see this Marty ?!?

(http://images.mentalfloss.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_640x430/public/marty-doc_12.jpg)