The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: DumbAss Tanker on December 07, 2016, 10:59:41 PM
-
kentuck (77,543 posts)
Loyalty above all.
Donald Trump values loyalty above all else when he is choosing someone for a position. If he/she is the type of person that would question a position of Donald's, they will not be considered. I don't see any person that has been nominated that will say "No" to Donald.
The manner in which Trump is putting generals into different positions is rather troublesome, in my opinion. If someone were looking to take control of our military could do it no better than what Donald Trump has done up to this point.
For NSA adviser, Lt General Michael Flynn will have total access to all intelligence, and he is very loyal to Trump.
And at the Defense Department, Trump wants "Mad Dog" Mattis. He is a well-respected Marine Corps General, who led the troops at Fallujah. If Trump did not think he was loyal to him, he would not have nominated him for Defense Secretary. All the generals, of all the armed forces, would be under the Secretary of Defense. They would be hesitant to make any decisions, without approval from the very top.
At Homeland Security, Trump wants another general. He would have access to all the police forces in all our local and city governments across the country. This is a very powerful position. If this is another loyalist position for Trump, then we could see how it might make someone a little apprehensive.
Who would be the "balance"? Where would the balance come from? If the Commander in Chief wanted to use the military or police forces in a questionable way, who would stop him? Where are the checks and balances??
Linky-dink: http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512648111
Hey, Kentuck, you stupid f@ck, that was exactly why OBOZO made Mattis retire early and unleashed his Department of Vengeance and Suppression on Petraeus rather than saying pish-tush like he did with Hitlery's far-worse offenses.
:aliens:
-
I would prefer this over Obumbles pick of Panetta as Sec of Defense and CIA director.
-
Is kt so irremediably stupid as to imagine Trump would pick people who hate him or are diametrically opposed to him? Even a few DU-folk should call out the megalithic stupidity of that post!
I realize that the MSM will knee-jerkingly demonize each and every person Trump picks. But they find a cause for concern in a former general heading up DoD and DHS? People who have extreme knowledge and competence in those fields? CC does not have enough ::) s and :o s in stock to express the moronicity of that "concern"!
-
Is kt so irremediably stupid as to imagine Trump would pick people who hate him or are diametrically opposed to him? Even a few DU-folk should call out the megalithic stupidity of that post!
The left is now in the minority across the board - therefore, they are eager for 'bipartisanship' - when they are in the lead however, damn dirty rethugs need not apply.
-
The left is now in the minority across the board - therefore, they are eager for 'bipartisanship' - when they are in the lead however, damn dirty rethugs need not apply.
Exactly.
Tough shit, primitives. :whistling:
-
Is kt so irremediably stupid as to imagine Trump would pick people who hate him or are diametrically opposed to him? Even a few DU-folk should call out the megalithic stupidity of that post!
I realize that the MSM will knee-jerkingly demonize each and every person Trump picks. But they find a cause for concern in a former general heading up DoD and DHS? People who have extreme knowledge and competence in those fields? CC does not have enough ::) s and :o s in stock to express the moronicity of that "concern"!
Can you fathom?
Bernie Sanders for Treasury
Alan Grayson for State
Sheila Jackson Lee for Defense
Ad nauseum.
Those picks wouldn't even make liberals happy enough. Just the types of those idiots makes me cringe.