The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Mary Ann on December 01, 2016, 04:51:19 PM
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028322446
jodymarie aimee (452 posts)
Recount began this AM in WI and I was doing so well
I have been so hopeful and not crying anymore. Well, I stayed late at the gym. 5:30-9AM and Kate, who I have not seen since the election, comes in and greets me and just starts bawling. I did not need that. She said Jody this is the end. We cannot be naive. This is how it started in Germany. I said I am grabbing onto any shred of hope like the recounts and audits and college that he will never make it into the WH. She replied he is in for good. We have to face it. So, now I feel like maybe I am a dope??? She said there are no heroes anymore... that is true. A stupid and uninformed electorate have given us this man. I took a few steps backwards and it doesn't feel good. Kate and I are both firebrands in our city. We eat breathe and sleep politics. To see her so defeated like I was for 2 weeks leaves me shaky again.
:whatever:
Your tears taste like melted snowflakes. Idiot.
-
And the price of salt continues to drop!
WINNING!
-
I've purchased lots of gallon jugs to collect liberal tears over the next 8 years.
-
:whatever:
Your tears taste like melted snowflakes. Idiot.
Keep in mind DUmmie, a town in Wisconsin found they under-reported Trump votes. Instead of him getting 48 out of this town, he got 448.
+400 for the Donald
Your tears are sweet.
-
Keep in mind DUmmie, a town in Wisconsin found they under-reported Trump votes. Instead of him getting 48 out of this town, he got 448.
+400 for the Donald
Your tears are sweet.
They're saying that even before the recount, Trump's lead over Broomhilda has shrunk by 23,000 votes. Supposedly reported by MSNBC. Don't know how that could have happened--or what it may mean for the final total . . .
-
They're saying that even before the recount, Trump's lead over Broomhilda has shrunk by 23,000 votes. Supposedly reported by MSNBC. Don't know how that could have happened--or what it may mean for the final total . . .
I heard that rumor. It's 23,000 over 3 states. I don't know how that could happen since recounts haven't occurred in michigan and pennsylvania.
It's hyperbole in my opinion. Wishful thinking. The DUmmies will latch on to any rumor and believe it's true.
Fake news.
-
I heard that rumor. It's 23,000 over 3 states. I don't know how that could happen since recounts haven't occurred in michigan and pennsylvania.
It's hyperbole in my opinion. Wishful thinking. The DUmmies will latch on to any rumor and believe it's true.
Fake news.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512636878
politicaljunkie41910 (1,672 posts)
Steve Kornacki just reported on MSNBC that the PA vote count difference between Trump and Hillary
just dropped from approximately 70K in favor of Trump down to 46,978 before the recount even starts. Apparently there were some votes in Philadelphia that had not been counted and certified and those votes came in this morning resulting in the update. A reduction of approx 23,022 votes just as the recount is ramping up. Interesting that we hadn't heard about these outstanding votes previous and they just wiped out more than a third of Trumps lead in the state. Hmmmmm!!!!!!
I tried the MSNBC website and haven't found anything yet. The DUmmy may have misunderstood.
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512636878I tried the MSNBC website and haven't found anything yet. The DUmmy may have misunderstood.
IF, IF I had a mole, and put up a post over there that hitlary pulled ahead (without an official recount of WI, MI and PA), they'd believe it. They'd be orgasmic, but doomed to another letdown.
This is all BS since no recounts have been done exept WI (which shows a gain in Trump votes). MI and PA haven't, and won't, recount.
-
Keep in mind DUmmie, a town in Wisconsin found they under-reported Trump votes. Instead of him getting 48 out of this town, he got 448.
+400 for the Donald
Your tears are sweet.
Recountmas!!!!
They're saying that even before the recount, Trump's lead over Broomhilda has shrunk by 23,000 votes. Supposedly reported by MSNBC. Don't know how that could have happened--or what it may mean for the final total . . .
I figured that would happen. Always happens in a recount. Dems totals always go up cause they always just to seem to find some box or 30 of ballots that just happened to get overlooked.
-
Keep in mind DUmmie, a town in Wisconsin found they under-reported Trump votes. Instead of him getting 48 out of this town, he got 448.
+400 for the Donald
Your tears are sweet.
According to the DUmmies, Trump's lead in PA has been reduced by a third because some uncounted ballots for Hitlery were miraculously 'Found,' not surprisingly in Philly; they do not seem able to detect the distinct aroma of highly-adaptive large urban rodent in the whole thing.
-
I think I found where they are getting their numbers from, and it's a leftards twitter feed comparing Trumps numbers to barrys from the last election. :lmao:
DUmbshits fake numbers (https://twitter.com/SteveKornacki?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor)
-
According to the DUmmies, Trump's lead in PA has been reduced by a third because some uncounted ballots for Hitlery were miraculously 'Found,' not surprisingly in Philly; they do not seem able to detect the distinct aroma of highly-adaptive large urban rodent in the whole thing.
That's what worries me--Franken in 2008, Grigoire (in Washington) in 2004 . . . The Dem strategy always seems to be recount til their candidate pulls ahead, and then declare the election final. And there ALWAYS seem to be just enough votes miraculously found to cause them to pull ahead.
-
That's what worries me--Franken in 2008, Grigoire (in Washington) in 2004 . . . The Dem strategy always seems to be recount til their candidate pulls ahead, and then declare the election final. And there ALWAYS seem to be just enough votes miraculously found to cause them to pull ahead.
Not enough time for a re-recount. The results in PA and MI have been certified so the recount if in progress has no effect on Dec 13.
-
And the price of salt continues to drop!
WINNING!
:rotf:
Not enough time for a re-recount. The results in PA and MI have been certified so the recount if in progress has no effect on Dec 13.
Both require them to go to court to prove standing and present verifiable evidence of fraud. Not happening.
-
That's what worries me--Franken in 2008, Grigoire (in Washington) in 2004 . . . The Dem strategy always seems to be recount til their candidate pulls ahead, and then declare the election final. And there ALWAYS seem to be just enough votes miraculously found to cause them to pull ahead.
Me too, but like you, I will wait to get excited about it until more credible reports come out, rather than rely on DU's third-hand and quite-possibly-misinterpreted numbers.
-
Me too, but like you, I will wait to get excited about it until more credible reports come out, rather than rely on DU's third-hand and quite-possibly-misinterpreted numbers.
You will have to Google the details but PA and WI judges have refused the recounts (I think in WI it is the hand count).
Eever, ever, over
-
:rotf:
Both require them to go to court to prove standing and present verifiable evidence of fraud. Not happening.
Yup, it's over.
They can cause problems, maybe even some delays and run up a big bill, but nothing that is going to change the outcome. Trump will take the seat Jan 20.
All Stein has to do is spend a bunch of the free money and she gets to keep the other half for her pet projects. She's just playing off the butthurt and exploiting the wretched losers... inadvertently for our viewing pleasure, I might add
-
Stein is catching up!!!
http://heavy.com/news/2016/12/wisconsin-recount-results-vote-totals-update-who-leads-donald-trump-jill-stein-hillary-clinton-michigan-day-one/
The first day of the Wisconsin recount is over, and, perhaps ironically (or not, depending on your perspective), it was Green Party candidate Jill Stein who gained the most votes in the updated returns.
Stein’s vote tally increased by 17 votes (she went from 7 votes to 24 in the only reporting county), according to the Wisconsin Election Commission’s day 1 spreadsheet.
If some were hoping the recount would help Hillary Clinton and hurt Donald Trump, it didn’t on day 1 anyway. Hillary Clinton lost a grand total of one vote, and Donald Trump lost two. That means Trump lost a grand total of a net 1 vote on day 1 of the recount.
-
(https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/15181353_10211554413441829_748812327845981608_n.jpg?oh=b425c7370a9aedfcd74e8d68a0f3258f&oe=58BADB8E)
-
(https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/15181353_10211554413441829_748812327845981608_n.jpg?oh=b425c7370a9aedfcd74e8d68a0f3258f&oe=58BADB8E)
Marayanumbers would argue with you, but can't find a website. :whatever:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10221068
Maraya1969 (11,652 posts)
I can't find a website that will debunk this stupid claim that is filling up Google
My fundamentalist Christian brother sent me a mass email. Here are just 2 of the claims:
There are 3,141 counties in the United States.
Trump won 3,084 of them.
Clinton won 57.
I know this is bullshit but guess what happens when I put it in Google?
https://www.google.com/search?q=fact+check+Trump+won+3%2C084+of+them.+Clinton+won+57.&oq=fact+check+Trump+won+3%2C084+of+them.+Clinton+won+57.&aqs=chrome..69i57.9557j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
I checked snopes.com - Nothing
I put in "fact check" and "Hoax" before pasting various combinations of words about it - Nothing
I saw somewhere that she won 500 counties but I cannot find it again!
So I actually went to 4 states and counted the counties. CA, NJ, NY and IL. My total was: +65 Hillary
WHY is there no sites up countering this bullshit? The Democratic party needs to get their ass in gear and have a group dedicated to taking down these sites or at least getting up sites that debunk them and getting them up to the top, or even the first frigging page of Google!
-
http://www.inquisitr.com/3748311/donald-trump-won-2600-counties-compared-to-clintons-500-winning-83-of-the-geographic-nation/
Trump won 2600 counties v. Clinton's 500.
Politico did a state by state break down.
http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president