The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: fatboy on November 25, 2016, 02:01:09 AM

Title: PHDD: Why I think the vote count is more or less accurate
Post by: fatboy on November 25, 2016, 02:01:09 AM
One of the Four Horsewomen of the Femapocalypse set off a smoldering campfire....

Quote
Fri Nov 25, 2016, 01:31 AM

Star Member BainsBane (38,059 posts)

Why I think the vote count is more or less accurate
 
 
 Minnesota. Trump came within 1.5 points of winning Minnesota. Minnesota hasn't gone Republican since Nixon was reelected, but it came close this time. http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president/minnesota/

Our Governor and Secretary of State are Democrats. We had no voter repression. In fact, the state made it easier to vote by opening up early voting locations and no-excuse absentee voting. We also have same-day voter registration. I trust the count in my state. For Minnesota to come so close to going for Trump, there had to be a pro-Trump effect across the country.

I don't think the recount will alter the outcome. Remember, Clinton has to win all three states (WI, MI, and PA) to overturn Trump. I think the Dems aren't asking for recounts because they don't think it will alter the outcome.

I would like nothing more than to be wrong, but I have to think logically about this so as not to get my hopes up.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512625067


Quote
Response to LisaL (Reply #1)

Fri Nov 25, 2016, 01:36 AM

Star Member BainsBane (38,059 posts)

2. He did better than anticipated
 
and well enough to win the electoral college. That's what I meant.

Quote
Response to BainsBane (Original post)

Fri Nov 25, 2016, 02:08 AM

Star Member msongs (42,226 posts)

6. likely voter suppression was way more effective than any actual cheating issues. nt

Quote
Response to BainsBane (Original post)

Fri Nov 25, 2016, 02:21 AM

Star Member ucrdem (10,697 posts)

9. Here's why I disagree:
 
Michigan - More African-American voters than MN, and many thousands of ballots reported with no presidential vote from Detroit;
Wisconsin - 85% voter turnout and other anomalies in the county reports;
Pennsylvania - Anomalous R wins in Luzerne and similar counties.

So if the recounts go forward I'm prepared to be disappointed but I'd say the odds of waking up and finding out that Hillary is going be inaugurated are about 50-50

There are not going to be any recounts you retard.

Quote
Response to BainsBane (Reply #10)

Fri Nov 25, 2016, 02:29 AM

Star Member ucrdem (10,697 posts)

11. PA won't be easy but if the other two are reversed
 
all bets are off and I would not rule out a revote. Don't forget that the designated perp is Russia which will make extraordinary measures acceptable, also that the Supreme Court is likely to be invoked at some point and if Kennedy sides with the recount she wins.

Another retard. Everywhere I look.... retards.

 
 
 

Title: Re: PHDD: Why I think the vote count is more or less accurate
Post by: Patriot Guard Rider on November 25, 2016, 05:41:15 AM
They set themselves up for disappointment.

Hopes of a recount
Hopes of a redo of the election
Hopes of intimidating electoral college members
Hopes of the DNC doing something.

When nothing comes through, they fall further and further into despair.

I only wish that site had been up on election night. The responses as one state after another fell to Trump would have made me stand up and give myself a high five. But $kimmer, with his wifes ties to the DNC, knew the exit polling and knew Pickles Von Cankles was going to lose. He turned the site off and blamed a hacker, all so the place wouldn't absolutely explode election night.
Title: Re: PHDD: Why I think the vote count is more or less accurate
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on November 25, 2016, 05:51:40 AM
They're REALLY suckin' on a bong when they start talking about a re-vote.

 :stoner: :stoner: :stoner: :stoner: :stoner:

ETA - by the way, a lot of my family members left the 'President' line blank, though I have to say none of them are Black Detroit voters.
Title: Re: PHDD: Why I think the vote count is more or less accurate
Post by: Carl on November 25, 2016, 05:57:06 AM
Even if Stein doesn`t run off with their money while laughing the first recount that comes through and says Trump won the state will be rejected out of hand with some new conspiracy theory.

The fact is that,as usual,they come up with a notion and then believe it to be true.
A recount is not a repeat of the hanging chad debacle,it is simply a recheck of ballot totals.
Title: Re: PHDD: Why I think the vote count is more or less accurate
Post by: FlippyDoo on November 25, 2016, 06:23:51 AM
Quote
Response to BainsBane (Original post)

Fri Nov 25, 2016, 02:21 AM

Star Member ucrdem (10,697 posts)

9. Here's why I disagree:
 
Michigan - More African-American voters than MN, and many thousands of ballots reported with no presidential vote from Detroit;
Wisconsin - 85% voter turnout and other anomalies in the county reports;
Pennsylvania - Anomalous R wins in Luzerne and similar counties.


We lost so it had to be stolen. We told everyone that if they didn't vote for her royal majesty that they were stupid, racist, sexist, homophobic, and yada, yada, yada so it had to be stolen.

So if the recounts go forward I'm prepared to be disappointed but I'd say the odds of waking up and finding out that Hillary is going be inaugurated are about 50-50

Fixed it.
Title: Re: PHDD: Why I think the vote count is more or less accurate
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on November 25, 2016, 08:43:36 AM
The Democrat memes have become awfully clear.  The latest seems to be "blame Russia".
Title: Re: PHDD: Why I think the vote count is more or less accurate
Post by: 98ZJUSMC on November 25, 2016, 09:08:19 AM
They set themselves up for disappointment.

Hopes of a recount
Hopes of a redo of the election
Hopes of intimidating electoral college members
Hopes of the DNC doing something.

When nothing comes through, they fall further and further into despair.

(http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/7c/7c094b22fec61b2726641a552f710cbc4ff68860754b542c77042d872ad6fc2c.jpg)

Quote
I only wish that site had been up on election night. The responses as one state after another fell to Trump would have made me stand up and give myself a high five. But $kimmer, with his wifes ties to the DNC, knew the exit polling and knew Pickles Von Cankles was going to lose. He turned the site off and blamed a hacker, all so the place wouldn't absolutely explode election night.

We should sue for Refusal of Services.