The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: franksolich on November 04, 2016, 09:29:12 AM
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028270545
Oh dear.
More twiddle-twaddling nonsense, brought over just for the record, for when ol' Bob becomes a Top DUmmie of 2016.
TheMastersNemesis (6,046 posts) Fri Nov 4, 2016, 08:38 AM
Religious Right Thinks Its Entitled To Have US Theocracy. Will Doing Anything to Get It.
The embracing of Trump and other candidates who are immoral and even criminal reveals that the religious right believes it is completely entitled to have theocracy established in the US even against the will of the majority. They would even commit treason or push revolt or insurrection to get its way.
The radical Christian movement is really the enemy. They are much more dangerous than the terrorists because they are already hear in great numbers. And the churches a the seed bed of rebellion. They support Trump no matter how dangerous he is because he is more likely to advance all of their agenda than even any other GOPPER.
Taking America back or making America great again is really about having a white supremacist Bible based nation with all the laws to enforce religion.
0 replies, 273 views
^^^unusually high number of non-responses to "views."
-
Bob has totally fallen over the edge.
-
Bob has totally fallen over the edge.
ol' Bob's got to take a serious look at his numbers.
His readership's down, his reader-responses are w-a-a-a-a-a-y down, when compared with what they used to be.
When that happens, it means the writer's got to sit down and re-examine his "message," which obviously isn't resonating with the audience.
<<<wonders how ol' Bob would do, laying off politics and religion, and instead writing stories about grouchy old men with well-manicured lawns in a neighborhood with lots of kids.
-
The embracing of Trump and other candidates who are immoral and even criminal reveals that the religious right believes it is completely entitled to have theocracy established in the US
First of all, that statement makes no sense.
Secondly, where has Trump made even a suggestion of making America religious again? He's not even that particularly religious himself.
Still no replies.
-
Still no replies.
0 replies, 290 views
You know, madam, I watch my own numbers, my numbers here, like a hawk.
(For the record, franksolich does not great but modestly well, in both readership and responses. There's many here with larger readerships and more responses, but I myself am eminently satisfied doing modestly well.)
Whenever franksolich's numbers start slipping, I stop, sit back, and look, to see what's causing it.
Usually what causes the slippage is (a) I'm conveying messages that aren't of any particular interest to readers, and so it's time to find messages that are, or (b) I've gotten boring, and so it's time to remodel the literary techniques and content.
ol' Bob needs to think about that stuff himself; maybe he needs a new "message," to interest his fellow primitives.
Of course, my situation's complicated in that franksolich appears to have the largest readership here among primitives anonymously lurking here (as compared with among regular members, decent and civilized people), which means I really have two audiences.....and so which is the one for which I should write? Which is the one for which I should seek to please; to illuminate, to amuse?
Usually I just let whim and random chance decide which audience I'm "targeting." I think I do okay; not great, but okay. "Okay"'s good enough for me.
-
If Christians start throwing homosexuals off roofs, cutting children in half with chainsaws, mutilating clitorides, or stoning women for driving cars, then I'll worry.
Until then, **** you, Bob.
-
First of all, that statement makes no sense.
Secondly, where has Trump made even a suggestion of making America religious again? He's not even that particularly religious himself.
Still no replies.
It makes sense in TMN anti-utopian Fundie-infested fantasy world.
DU certainly does not lack for Christophobes. That even they don't respond to TMN's ravings should be a clue to him that he's gone wa-a-a-a-ayyy beyond mere Christian-hating fantasy.
-
2 replies, 340 views
Wounded Bear (11,686 posts) Fri Nov 4, 2016, 11:54 AM
2. Conservatives in general, religious folks especially...
have lost all acceptance of majority rule, which is a cornerstone of democracy, of course.
What they feel is right must be forced on others around them, regardless of realitys.
^^^quote saved, to see if the same primitive sings the same song the morning after the election.
-
Wounded Bear (11,686 posts) Fri Nov 4, 2016, 11:54 AM
2. Conservatives in general, religious folks especially...
have lost all acceptance of majority rule, which is a cornerstone of democracy, of course.
What they feel is right must be forced on others around them, regardless of realitys.
Oh, the irony.
Tranniess in public restrooms, anyone? Same sex marriage? Gender identity? Trigger warnings and microaggressions? Chik Fil-A?
-
Wounded Bear
Conservatives in general, religious folks especially have lost all acceptance of majority rule, which is a cornerstone of democracy.
When your idea of "majority rule" is "you must accept that what the majority has determined is to always be accepted and never to be challenged", which is how liberals want it to be with their sacred cows, then yes, we have no reason to accept so foolish of a premise, nor will we.
.
-
Oh, the irony.
Tranniess in public restrooms, anyone? Same sex marriage? Gender identity? Trigger warnings and microaggressions? Chik Fil-A?
You beat me to it Big Dog. Good job.
-
When your idea of "majority rule" is "you must accept that what the majority has determined is to always be accepted and never to be challenged", which is how liberals want it to be with their sacred cows, then yes, we have no reason to accept so foolish of a premise, nor will we.
.
Again . . . Which side respects the 2nd Amendment again?
Lefties just might find out the reason for its' inclusion in the Bill of Rights . . .
-
TheMastersNemesis (6,046 posts) Fri Nov 4, 2016, 08:38 AM
Religious Right Thinks Its Entitled To Have US Theocracy. Will Doing Anything to Get It.
The embracing of Trump and other candidates who are immoral and even criminal reveals that the religious right believes it is completely entitled to have theocracy established in the US even against the will of the majority. They would even commit treason or push revolt or insurrection to get its way.
The radical Christian movement is really the enemy. They are much more dangerous than the terrorists because they are already hear in great numbers. And the churches a the seed bed of rebellion. They support Trump no matter how dangerous he is because he is more likely to advance all of their agenda than even any other GOPPER.
Taking America back or making America great again is really about having a white supremacist Bible based nation with all the laws to enforce religion.
Once again Bob is out of step with a majority of Americans.
-
They are much more dangerous than the terrorists because they are already hear in great numbers.
I don't know how to break this to you, TMN, but we've been here since the country began. In fact, we arrived here >150 years before this country began. So if in the 240 years since this country started we haven't done the lunatic things you believe we want to do, could the problem be your hate-driven paranoid fantasies?
TMN's caretaker needs to take away his computer and give TMN the brand/model of laptop Dilbert's boss uses.
-
He's become a caricature of himself.
-
Oh that poor screen of Hop A Long's. It must feel like it has been in a CAT2 HURRICANE.
-
28 hours later, still not self-deleted, and only 3 replies. Isn't TMN entitled to more responses for all the wonderful material he contributes and all the traffic he drives fr ... errrrrrr, to DU? What ingrates DU-folk are!
-
I'm beginning to think there's some serious moling afoot, ala Ban the GOP.
Excellent job, whichever of you pulled this off.
-
(https://jasonbandrew.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/one_legged_man_arse_kicking_contest.jpg)
:whistling:
CMD
-
》Snippage of image《
:whistling:
CMD
But of course. :lmao:
Well done old boy, well done. :cheersmate: :hi5: :cheers2:
-
and Banzin will be in the top ten, if not higher. He deserves it and has worked hard this year for it - now the old atheist asshole is praying for a massive GOP loss:
Sat Nov 5, 2016, 02:28 PM
TheMastersNemesis (6,056 posts)
I Pray I Pray That Trump & GOP Underperform Grandly.
I hope they get a literally political two by four in the face without warning. Trump and the GOP need to be politically bloodied everywhere. It becomes more obvious by the day that the GOP must die. Now that we are close to election day the maggots are coming out to say they support Trump. McConnell, Ryan, Priebus, et al are saying they voted for or support Donald. They have been silent or waffling during this entire campaign season. They now have revealed who they are.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028273006
give him another pill, Clara Jane.
-
First of all, that statement makes no sense.
Secondly, where has Trump made even a suggestion of making America religious again? He's not even that particularly religious himself.
Still no replies.
You know, madam, I watch my own numbers, my numbers here, like a hawk.
(For the record, franksolich does not great but modestly well, in both readership and responses. There's many here with larger readerships and more responses, but I myself am eminently satisfied doing modestly well.)
Whenever franksolich's numbers start slipping, I stop, sit back, and look, to see what's causing it.
Usually what causes the slippage is (a) I'm conveying messages that aren't of any particular interest to readers, and so it's time to find messages that are, or (b) I've gotten boring, and so it's time to remodel the literary techniques and content.
ol' Bob needs to think about that stuff himself; maybe he needs a new "message," to interest his fellow primitives.
Of course, my situation's complicated in that franksolich appears to have the largest readership here among primitives anonymously lurking here (as compared with among regular members, decent and civilized people), which means I really have two audiences.....and so which is the one for which I should write? Which is the one for which I should seek to please; to illuminate, to amuse?
Usually I just let whim and random chance decide which audience I'm "targeting." I think I do okay; not great, but okay. "Okay"'s good enough for me.
I hear crickets chirping.
-
Another explosion of anti- Christian bigotry from Hopalong TMN, using lies, stereotypes, and accusations without a shred of proof to try and help inspire others to share his blind hatred. It's getting rather tedious at this point. Still, exposing and tearing apart his ignorant, hateful rants is rather fun.
"Religious Right Thinks Its Entitled To Have US Theocracy. Will Doing Anything to Get It."
Um, no. American Christians generally just want the freedom spelled out in the Constitution to be able to practice their beliefs, follow the core tenets of their faith, and act in accordance with the dictates of their consciences without having to worry about government bureaucrats and bigots like TMN stripping them of their rights and declaring them criminals because of what they believe. None of us have any interest in a theocracy.
btw, you talk about us going against "The will of the majority," yet take a wild guess which religion the majority of Americans have at least a professing devotion to?
" They would even commit treason or push revolt or insurrection to get its way."
WRONG! No American Christians have ever credibly done these things or advocated doing them. You have no evidence, as usual. btw, if you want to talk about committing treason, try looking at liberal darlings like John Kerry, Lynne Stewart, and Cindy Sheehan. They have all demonstrably committed treason, openly siding with our nation's enemies to harm America, with Sheehan having openly bragged of doing so. You want to talk about pushing revolt or insurrection, I can't count how many DU threads have openly encouraged violent insurrection, ESPECIALLY during the Bush Administration. One little chestnut that stands out for me was back in election season 2008, when a DU thread was put out which said that, if McCain was declared the winner in the election, they should violently seize control of/ shut down Washington DC until Obama is declared president.
"The radical Christian movement is really the enemy. They are much more dangerous than the terrorists because they are already hear in great numbers."
1. Gotta love his claiming that Christians peacefully seeking to be able to practice their faith in peace and have their 1st Amendment rights protected are "Much more dangerous" than ISIS savages who saw off people's heads, disfigure young women with acid for going to school, shoot up nightclubs, and bomb public areas full of people.
2. "They are already hear in great numbers"? And yet he has the gall to call others stupid and ignorant? A third- grader wouldn't make that kind of error.
3. Islamic terrorists are already here in great numbers. Their cells are just waiting for the opportunity to strike.
" And the churches a the seed bed of rebellion."
Considering I can guarantee you've never set foot in a church in your miserable life, and once again you have no proof, that is another ignorant lie. Still, way to subtly point out that you believe the government should throw the 1st Amendment out the window and crack down on all Christian churches.
" They support Trump no matter how dangerous he is because he is more likely to advance all of their agenda than even any other GOPPER."
That, again, is a lie (Big shocker). Trump has never really demonstrated any major religious leanings. Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio have been more upfront with their faith than he has.
"Taking America back or making America great again is really about having a white supremacist Bible based nation with all the laws to enforce religion."
That is a major leap to make, again with zero backing. Contrary to your assertions, Bobby- boy, only a very tiny, lunatic- fringe number of conservatives are white supremacists (Keeping in mind that Hillary has referred to Robert "Senator Sheets" Byrd as her personal mentor). Also, again, Trump has never really demonstrated any major religious leanings, so I wouldn't see him being that driven to have "A Bible- based nation." Also, once again, the overwhelming majority of American Christians, yes, including those mean old "Religious right" types, are not interested in making America a Christian theocracy, they just want to ensure that their basic religious rights outlined in the Constitution are protected so they can practice their faith in peace and not have to worry about government bureaucrats or Godless bigots like Hopalong Bob forcing them by unconstitutional laws to go against the teachings of their faith or dictates of their consciences.
Just keep puking out your ignorance, Bob, and we'll keep tearing it apart, you sad, hate- filled little man.
-
If Christians start throwing homosexuals off roofs, cutting children in half with chainsaws, mutilating clitorides, or stoning women for driving cars, then I'll worry.
We plan on that for Nov 9 after Trump wins (/sarc)
-
You know, madam, I watch my own numbers, my numbers here, like a hawk.
(For the record, franksolich does not great but modestly well, in both readership and responses. There's many here with larger readerships and more responses, but I myself am eminently satisfied doing modestly well.)
Whenever franksolich's numbers start slipping, I stop, sit back, and look, to see what's causing it.
Usually what causes the slippage is (a) I'm conveying messages that aren't of any particular interest to readers, and so it's time to find messages that are, or (b) I've gotten boring, and so it's time to remodel the literary techniques and content.
ol' Bob needs to think about that stuff himself; maybe he needs a new "message," to interest his fellow primitives.
Of course, my situation's complicated in that franksolich appears to have the largest readership here among primitives anonymously lurking here (as compared with among regular members, decent and civilized people), which means I really have two audiences.....and so which is the one for which I should write? Which is the one for which I should seek to please; to illuminate, to amuse?
Usually I just let whim and random chance decide which audience I'm "targeting." I think I do okay; not great, but okay. "Okay"'s good enough for me.
Tl;dr
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
-
Mb-TS, I appreciate your patient fisking of TMN's nonsense!
" And the churches a the seed bed of rebellion."
Considering I can guarantee you've never set foot in a church in your miserable life, and once again you have no proof, that is another ignorant lie. Still, way to subtly point out that you believe the government should throw the 1st Amendment out the window and crack down on all Christian churches.
This is pathetic, on TMN's part. He's so beyond grossly ignorant of the kind of churches he hates most that he apparently doesn't know that many post their sermons and services online, a vast tide of evidence available with a few mouse clicks contradicting his stupider than ludicrous claim.
-
and Banzin will be in the top ten, if not higher. He deserves it and has worked hard this year for it - now the old atheist asshole is praying for a massive GOP loss:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028273006
give him another pill, Clara Jane.
Praying to whom? To the ghost of his missing foot?
-
We plan on that for Nov 9 after Trump wins (/sarc)
Hey, preacher, leave those clits alone!
-
We have NEVER been a nation based on the rule of the majority, DUmbasses. We are a nation that was founded to be based in the rule of law.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Hey, preacher, leave those clits alone!
DAMMIT!
Friggin' earworm that I won't be able to get out of my head for weeks. :argh:
Thanks a lot, man!
-
Bob has totally fallen over the edge.
....and his chute didn't open.
Wow. :thatsright: Just, wow.
(https://jasonbandrew.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/one_legged_man_arse_kicking_contest.jpg)
:rofl: :hi5:
-
First of all, that statement makes no sense.
Secondly, where has Trump made even a suggestion of making America religious again? He's not even that particularly religious himself.
Still no replies.
So many things have been said about Trump which have no basis in truth. Anything to get people to not vote for him while Hillary has actual facts showing her corruption and views vs what the left would like people to believe.