The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: CC27 on October 20, 2016, 08:59:47 AM
-
MineralMan (87,842 posts)
Immediately after the debate ended, I watched
Trump intently. As Hillary went down, smiling, to shake the moderator's hand, Donald was still at the podium, looking either bewildered, angry, or defeated. Perhaps his face was showing all three emotions.
Finally, he gathered himself and gave Wallace a Rotary club handshake. I think he looked stunned throughout the after-debate activities on the platform. He knows it's over. He knows he did poorly. He knows that the "nasty woman" has beaten him. I don't know what his next step will be. He knows it's over.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512529004
I would love to wipe that condensing mug off rock heads face.
-
Whatever a DUmbass believes one can assume exactly the opposite is true.
-
Whatever a DUmbass believes one can assume exactly the opposite is true.
Exacly :cheersmate: Their track record isn't known for being right.
-
Bullshit.
He was letting the lying bitch get off the stage, he probably didn't want to even get close to her.
-
Bullshit.
He was letting the lying bitch get off the stage, he probably didn't want to even get close to her.
He didn't want to be accused of "stalking" her.
-
My GF and I watched the debate and she stated Trump looked like he was trying to control his anger and annoyance at the lying sack of shit to his left. Her words.
I think so too. I think he did a great job and wish he would have hammered Hillary even more- but the damage he caused was great. The Open Borders quote... "I was talking about energy..." Jesus ****ing Christ! How could any normal person be on stage and not simply loose it at the level of lies from the queen bitch?
The things I saw made me think that if America doesn't elect Trump we are just ****ed.
-
My wife and I watched it, and we agreed that the comment about not accepting the results of the election, should he lose (I doubt it, because of the hidden Brexit-style vote), was a mistake. But, I thought that, despite that, he won the debate. Using the Wikileaks revelations against her was a good move.
-
My wife and I watched it, and we agreed that the comment about not accepting the results of the election, should he lose (I doubt it, because of the hidden Brexit-style vote), was a mistake. But, I thought that, despite that, he won the debate. Using the Wikileaks revelations against her was a good move.
You would never know he won the debate because the left and the media (BIRM) are just focusing on his comment about not accepting the election results.
-
1. Trump didn't say he would not accept the election results, unlike many democrats have.
2. He said he would keep us in suspense.
3. Trump never takes options off the table. That is good negotiating.
4. Trump keeps in the news cycle the fact that many elections are products of democrat voter fraud.
I think it was a good answer. I know it was because all the usual evil suspects are on it. You take the flak when over target.
-
1. Trump didn't say he would not accept the election results, unlike many democrats have.
2. He said he would keep us in suspense.
3. Trump never takes options off the table. That is good negotiating.
4. Trump keeps in the news cycle the fact that many elections are products of democrat voter fraud.
I think it was a good answer. I know it was because all the usual evil suspects are on it. You take the flak when over target.
If you scan all the media outlets, they are doing their level best to convince everyone that what Trump said was outrageous. The fact is, the only people who are outraged are the DUmp-monkey types and people trying to generate click-bait stories. Based on current revelations regarding the democrat mode of operation and underhanded methods, if I were in Trump's shoes and you asked me that question, my answer would likely be quite similar... I wouldn't commit to that until I saw the actual result and how it was achieved. Smart people (not that I consider myself smart) don't pass judgement until they can analyze the thing they are looking at. You may WANT to convict George Zimmerman, but if you are smart, you'll wait until you've seen ALL the evidence. How is this any different? It's not.