Post by: USA4ME on October 18, 2016, 03:07:14 PM
Quote from:
gollygee
I'm tired of people calling Hillary Clinton a "proven criminal"
It's completely untrue and delusional, but I keep hearing Trump supporters say that. There's an actual definition to "proven." It means something specific. Hillary has been investigated to a ridiculous degree, and has found to not be a criminal. Obviously she is not a "proven criminal."
That is my vent for today.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028238611
More like a crying fit, but call it what you will.
Quote from:
Warpy
1. "Oh yeah? What's been proven?"
and I don't let them weasel out of it at all, not until they admit they get all their "proven" horse shit from talk radio and Trump speeches. The Grabbing Our Privates party has been trying to find a crime to hang on her for 25 years and has come up consistently empty of everything but increasingly vicious slander against her.
Yeah, I'm pissed off too.
It's been proven you're an idiot if you can't read what's right in front of you.
Quote from:
2. You need to stop listening to Trump supporters.
Granted, when you're working and a lot of your co-workers are rabid rightists, you may have to use ear phones, ear plugs, or constant humming or chanting, (depending on the kind of work you do) to avoid hearing them, but do it! Personally, I've never heard that phrase.
(fingers in ears) LA-LA-LA-LA-LA.....
Quote from:
lpbk2713
3. But it's got to be true.
They saw it on the inner nets. And heard it on Faux.
No originality with these primitives.
Quote from:
doc03
4. Worse yet they like to say she killed all those people
Vince Foster could not be reached for comment. Maybe ask Webb Hubbell's daughter, Chelsea.
Quote from:
vi5
5. Well Republicans must be incompetent investigators because they've spent the past 25 year plus investigating the Clintons, and the last 5 or so heavily investigating Hillary at much taxpayer cost. You'd think if it were so provable that they would have done a better job proving something or getting her arrested or in prison or wherever it is they think she belongs.
:mental: :whatever:
Quote from:
BKH70041
6. It's in the eye of the beholder.
OJ wasn't convicted in his criminal trail, but virtually everyone still thought he did it.
I know this isn't popular here, but I don't live at this site, and what's happening in the real world is what's really happening. I'm not going to pretend as if things are the way people at this site want them to be are actually true. But between Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump, WikiLeaks, and a few other outlets, the bloom has been nuked off the rose. A whole bunch of people who suspected collusion among certain entities are now reading documented evidence confirming it. It doesn't matter if people here or elsewhere are saying prove it or you're not reading what you're really reading or whatever other rationalization they come up with to try to convince themselves they're right and the people who are seeing it a different way are wrong. They're not listening anyway because they view the nay-sayers as willing stooges. And in many cases, they're right. The point is these people's trust in government officials, government itself, and elections have diminished in ways they just won't recover in at least the next 4 years, and likely longer. Now, that's real.
I don't care if people want to deny it or argue who is to blame or any of that. It doesn't matter what spin you want to put on it, what you need to realize is we're getting ready to live the results of it.
Hillary will win the battle. Winning the war is looking less likely.
Look primitive, nice smackdown of the idiots over there and you make really good points, but you're talking to a bunch of primitives who have already predetermined what they want to believe anyway. They don't want to hear that things coming out are going to have lasting effects or that no one cares who's to blame. They just want their god to not be questioned. And like the OP, they just want to complain about it.
Get with the program!
.
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on October 18, 2016, 03:11:01 PM
Post by: Maverick1987 on October 18, 2016, 03:29:30 PM
Post by: 67 Rover on October 18, 2016, 04:09:45 PM
Yes it is a crime (felony) and yes she did have classified documents on her personal server. Game, set, match.
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on October 18, 2016, 05:37:32 PM
So Hillary did not have classified documents on a private server?But but but she didn't know what the "C" meant!!!
Yes it is a crime (felony) and yes she did have classified documents on her personal server. Game, set, match.
Post by: landofconfusion80 on October 18, 2016, 06:45:00 PM
But but but she didn't know what the "C" meant!!!She should....she's been called one all her life
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
Post by: 98ZJUSMC on October 18, 2016, 08:14:41 PM
So Hillary did not have classified documents on a private server? :p
Yes it is a crime (felony) and yes she did have classified documents on her personal server. Game, set, match.
No way you can get those infants to acknowledge that.
It's not possible.
Post by: Karin on October 19, 2016, 06:58:17 AM
Post by: Carl on October 19, 2016, 07:16:08 AM
Post by: USA4ME on October 19, 2016, 07:30:13 AM
They removed BKH's post. Glad we saved it. Just removing a post doesn't change reality, DUmmies. You keep thinking it does.
Figures.
Well, they can remove a post they don't want to believe, but as the primitive pointed out, they're going to have to live with the results of everyone else having read the Wikileaks and knowing it to be true.
Let's see how they react when (not if, but *when*) reality hits them. I'm guessing they'll cry and moan, and then cry and moan some more.
.
Post by: VelvetElvis on October 19, 2016, 07:40:38 AM
But but but she didn't know what the "C" meant!!!landofconfusion80 on: October 18, 2016, 08:45:00 PM
Quote
She should....she's been called one all her life
Well, that settles it then!
She obviously thought the "C" on the top indicated it was a message for HER. ::)
Post by: SVPete on October 19, 2016, 08:14:26 AM
She should....she's been called one all her life
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
She had cankles even as a child? :rimshot: :bolt:
Quote
gollygee
I'm tired of people calling Hillary Clinton a "proven criminal"
Obama's INJustice Department helped The CHILL stonewall, and finally refused to prosecute her. So, no, in the narrow legal sense, it hasn't been proven by way of a criminal conviction. But it's a distinction without a difference. What The CHILL did (some of it, at least) is a matter of public record, and she clearly violated the law, massively.
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on October 19, 2016, 10:51:19 AM
Post by: SVPete on October 19, 2016, 11:04:06 AM
She's been proven a criminal to my satisfaction, even if the DOJ will never prosecute her. Hey, DUmmies, was Nixon a 'Proven criminal' by YOUR lights?
How many DU-folk called G.W. Bush a war criminal? A deserter or AWOL? A draft-dodger? Called Cheney and Rice war criminals?