The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: CC27 on September 28, 2016, 09:52:28 AM
-
MrScorpio (65,958 posts)
That explains a lot...
(https://66.media.tumblr.com/86b7b05bc928afb0682df2ab6950aa4e/tumblr_oe7krpkKVU1u5bakpo1_540.jpg)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028194346
Explains what asshole?
-
Does this explain a lot, too, Mrs. C?
(http://a5.mzstatic.com/us/r30/Purple/v4/76/9c/e5/769ce5b7-9daa-4905-041e-091e2e6fea09/screen480x480.jpeg)
-
Yes it does Lamond,it explains what a pus brain mutt you are.
-
Explains what asshole?
I expect that the cretin is alluding to only the black parts as having been shot.
So profound. :whatever:
-
You have to hand it to Lamond, he NEVER tires of his own schtick.
[youtube]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AO_t7GtXO6w
[/youtube]
-
You have to hand it to Lamond, he NEVER tires of his own schtick.
He found his niche. :whatever:
-
One of the firearm recertification classes I took they had us shoot at green silhouettes instead of black ones. The reasoning was that so some a-hole lawyer would not be able to say we were trained to shoot at "black" targets (meaning black people) if we ever shot a black person.
-
One of the firearm recertification classes I took they had us shoot at green silhouettes instead of black ones. The reasoning was that so some a-hole lawyer would not be able to say we were trained to shoot at "black" targets (meaning black people) if we ever shot a black person.
Yeah, but it's OK to train for shooting Undead-Americans.
Zombiephobe!
-
One of the firearm recertification classes I took they had us shoot at green silhouettes instead of black ones. The reasoning was that so some a-hole lawyer would not be able to say we were trained to shoot at "black" targets (meaning black people) if we ever shot a black person.
#GreenLivesMatter
-
I expect that the cretin is alluding to only the black parts as having been shot.
So profound. :whatever:
And so precisely near and around the center of each ring - no shots touching the border between two rings - and so nicely all around each ring, no clustered hits. Almost as if some activist bought or created a target, selectively punched holes in it, printed "Police Department Shooting Range" (no city name) across the top, and made it look like a photo of a newspaper clipping. As in totally phony, yet believed by MrS and various DU-folk because it fits their worldview.
If some one posts a link to this pic from the Chattanooga Times-Freepress I'll at least believe the "picture" was published (maybe by a "news"paper whose confirmation bias caused them not to confirm the picture is real).
-
One of the firearm recertification classes I took they had us shoot at green silhouettes instead of black ones. The reasoning was that so some a-hole lawyer would not be able to say we were trained to shoot at "black" targets (meaning black people) if we ever shot a black person.
Did anyone report you all to the NAAMP? They would be SOOOO angry!
-
And so precisely near and around the center of each ring - no shots touching the border between two rings - and so nicely all around each ring, no clustered hits. Almost as if some activist bought or created a target, selectively punched holes in it, printed "Police Department Shooting Range" (no city name) across the top, and made it look like a photo of a newspaper clipping. As in totally phony, yet believed by MrS and various DU-folk because it fits their worldview.
If some one posts a link to this pic from the Chattanooga Times-Freepress I'll at least believe the "picture" was published (maybe by a "news"paper whose confirmation bias caused them not to confirm the picture is real).
One of the half wits has at least one brain cell there.
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Wed Sep 28, 2016, 10:27 AM
Separation (1,147 posts)
2. Lol
Sorry, but that is not a "police range shooting target". They use silhouettes not bullseye targets. This looks like a cartoon from a newspaper.
-
Whoever did the shooting needs to reload. They missed some.
.
-
Read it and weep DUchebags:
90% Nonwhite Violent Crime Rate: FBI
http://newobserveronline.com/90-nonwhite-violent-crime-rate-fbi/
It isn't social or economical problems that plague violent crime in non-white areas. It is non-whitness. Genetics, it's a bitch.
As always, It is not gun violence. It is black males aged 14-58 violence.
-
So, MrScorpio sees something from a newspaper - im guessing the accompanying article contained heavily editorialized content which is all pro BLM.. - and believes that the picture of the target with only the black rings shot is a genuine image..
Yeah.. so very smart MrScorpio is.
-
One of the firearm recertification classes I took they had us shoot at green silhouettes instead of black ones. The reasoning was that so some a-hole lawyer would not be able to say we were trained to shoot at "black" targets (meaning black people) if we ever shot a black person.
That was actually a real complaint about 7-8yrs ago. Most departments switched their silhouettes to purple... I'm not sure if Barney the Dinosaur got offended or what, but I have saw Green ones starting to pop up (no doubt this is because they want to shoot people who do not have a "Green" card... hmmm..)
-
That was actually a real complaint about 7-8yrs ago. Most departments switched their silhouettes to purple... I'm not sure if Barney the Dinosaur got offended or what, but I have saw Green ones starting to pop up (no doubt this is because they want to shoot people who do not have a "Green" card... hmmm..)
Well! That might mollify the Martians, but what about those violent violet Venusians?!!!
-
Well! That might mollify the Martians, but what about those violent violet Venusians?!!!
Remember, Men Are From Mars, Women Are From Venus . . . :whistling: :runaway:
:tongue:
-
Another nonsensical post by MrsCorpio:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028196265
There is CLEARLY more to this story, or it didn't happen.
What a fraud.
-
Another nonsensical post by MrsCorpio:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028196265
There is CLEARLY more to this story, or it didn't happen.
What a fraud.
The lunacy that is going to happen in that thread, needs it's own thread here in the Dump...lol.
-
The lunacy that is going to happen in that thread, needs it's own thread here in the Dump...lol.
Even some of the loonier (D)Ullards poo-poo'd it, pretty quickly.
Star Member metroins (1,791 posts)
13. No, I do not think this can happen
The way it's portrayed in this twitter post.
I think if you read the twitter feed objectively, it seems to either be missing a LOT of facts or is crying wolf.
I believe YOUR post because that seems legit.
I do not believe a perfectly fine young man with a lojack app is arrested for calling the police when his car was stolen. It's just not logical.
Police aren't fingerprint you without charging/arresting. No cop wants to do paperwork for no reason.
I'd actually believe the OP if the cop beat up the kid, that I could wrap my head around. Creating a paper trail for no reason, makes no sense.
Lee-Lee (3,135 posts)
17. You don't get taken in and fingerprinted unless your actually charged with something
And then they don't drop the charges because your mom calls and raises hell.
Among some people it's quite fashionable these days to claim police misconduct or abuse where none exists, because it's the hot topic of the day and gets you attention. Since this little account is short on facts and presents a timeline that makes no sense that's how it reads to me.
If they gave a town we could fact check and look for the police report. But conveniently they don't. A bad PD should be called out by name....
But the retards still insist:
Star Member malaise (146,595 posts)
16. A lot of it is envy
How dare this black kid drive a nice car
-
Basically, it seems there's no Hate-Cops :bouncy: too stupid and implausible for MrS and mal not to buy.