The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on September 25, 2016, 06:49:02 AM
-
bigtree (64,657 posts)
Taunting a woman because her husband cheated on her
Lauren Wolfe @Wolfe321
Taunting a woman because her husband cheated on her is a very sick form of misogyny. #Election2016
https://t.co/momdg6lBGP
Hmmm...
If Proglodytes are complaining it must be effective.
Kathy M (444 posts)
8. I am reading this differently , just reread Cuban 's tweet . Then read article posted
From the article
" Clinton communications director Jennifer Palmieri commented, “Hillary Clinton plans on using the debate to discuss the issues that make a difference in people’s lives. It’s not surprising that Donald Trump has chosen a different path.â€
A Clinton official speaking with BuzzFeed News said Trump’s reaction showed he was easily provoked which would undermine attempts to show he was presidential at the debate.
The co-chair of the nonpartisan commission that operates the debates said on Saturday that Cuban will not actually be sitting in the front row. But he will attend the debate, continuing his ongoing feud, which dates back about a decade, with Trump. Just this summer, Cuban questioned whether Trump is really a billionaire and criticized Trump as a liar."
Could be wrong but from the response from Clinton communications Don fell for bait . So where is Flowers going to sit by Melania , Ivanka ?
A little further down in article .......
" Flowers confirmed the news in on her public Facebook linked from her website
“Hi Donald Trump… I’m in your corner. Of course I will see u at the debate !!,†Flowers wrote on Facebook.
It still boils down to misogyny by Don
vlyons (1,303 posts)
22. Gennifer Flowers is not a very smart person
What kind of woman allows herself to be used by Donald Trump, who cares not a bit if she gets humiliated? Having been burned once, she allows herself to be excoriated once again the MAmedia and millions of women, who have no sympathy for "the other woman" and would-be home wrecker. Flowers must be desparate for attention. Pathetic.
But it's okay if Bill uses her and Hillary destroys her.
misterhighwasted (7,971 posts)
21. FLOWERS is guilty of exactly the same as Trump.
Taunting the wife of the man she had an affair with.
Its a sick form of intimidation.
What's Bill guilty of?
What's Hillary guilty of?
Hillary knowingly put up with Bill for this exact moment of running to be president. This is the culmination of everything Hillary consciously chose to pursue.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028185824
-
Just yesterday they thought putting Mark Cuban in the front row was a stroke of genius from the beasts camp but once again Trump kicks their sorry behinds.
-
Just yesterday they thought putting Mark Cuban in the front row was a stroke of genius from the beasts camp but once again Trump kicks their sorry behinds.
Even better, Trump doesn't even need Flowers at the debate to get the desired effect.
The Proglodytes are creating the entire show inside the outrage of their minds without Trump having to lift a finger. He's getting free publicity about it from Hillary's own camp.
-
Even better, Trump doesn't even need Flowers at the debate to get the desired effect.
The Proglodytes are creating the entire show inside the outrage of their minds without Trump having to lift a finger. He's getting free publicity about it from Hillary's own camp.
Their ability to self immolate knows no bounds.
-
Just yesterday they thought putting Mark Cuban in the front row was a stroke of genius from the beasts camp but once again Trump kicks their sorry behinds.
Who is it who famously said to hit back twice as hard? The SHREW & crew decided to tweak Trump by inviting Cuban, and Trump responded. I doubt seeing Cuban will have much effect on Trump, beyond possibly greeting him from the podium; OTOH, I doubt The SHREW will be unaffected by Flowers' presence, even if she does not see her.
bigtree (64,657 posts)
Taunting a woman because her husband cheated on her
Lauren Wolfe @Wolfe321
Taunting a woman because her husband cheated on her is a very sick form of misogyny.
Interesting admission, no? After The SHREW's decades of denial and attacking WJC's victims, it's not misogyny, it's "karma", poetic justice, and revenge. The SHREW worked worked for decades to earn this. If she finds this an inopportune moment for said cosmic justice, too damn bad.
-
Just yesterday they thought putting Mark Cuban in the front row was a stroke of genius from the beasts camp but once again Trump kicks their sorry behinds.
Knowing Trump, he will take it as a change of heart by Cuban and will greet him (Cuban) with "I knew you would come around, Mark! Thanks for coming here to support me!"
-
Knowing Trump, he will take it as a change of heart by Cuban and will greet him (Cuban) with "I knew you would come around, Mark! Thanks for coming here to support me!"
Indeed! Negating and mocking The SHREW's stunt will be easy. I don't think The SHREW will be able to laugh off Flowers' presence with a line like, "Was it good for you?" though. I hope she tries, though, as it would call attention to her long-term support of a serial abuser of women and history of attacking the women WJC abused.
-
So she starts it and Trump finishes it. And now the primitives and other assorted nutjobs wanna cry about it and try to label it.
Meh.
.
-
bigtree (64,657 posts)
Taunting a woman because her husband cheated on her
Lauren Wolfe @Wolfe321
Taunting a woman because her husband cheated on her is a very sick form of misogyny. #Election2016
https://t.co/momdg6lBGP
What difference, at this point, does it make?!?
Oops. My bad. That question is only appropriate when in regards to Americans getting killed, but it's not appropriate in regards to hurting the feelings (if she has any) of a potentially criminal battle ax.