The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Carl on September 22, 2016, 03:08:41 PM
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028180159
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 12:22 PM
Calculating (314 posts)
Innocents attacked by the rioters in Charlotte
[youtube]https://youtu.be/R7yYARGFKbM[/youtube]
Is this really beneficial to the cause? All I see it doing is driving more whites to white supremacist thinking.
Obozo sons in their glory.
Response to Calculating (Original post)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 12:31 PM
Exilednight (8,597 posts)
2. This video lacks context.
How do we know she's not already a white supremacist
Die on fire in a ditch.
Response to Exilednight (Reply #2)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 12:41 PM
B2G (7,093 posts)
4. Are you even serious right now?? Nt
Yup.
Response to B2G (Reply #4)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 12:44 PM
Exilednight (8,597 posts)
6. Dead serious. what happened before that?
Did she hit one of them before the video started?
Response to Exilednight (Reply #6)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 02:21 PM
Egnever (18,093 posts)
23. Does it matter?
Response to Egnever (Reply #23)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 03:04 PM
Exilednight (8,597 posts)
31. Yes.
If someone hits me first, I'm hitting back twice as hard, and not stopping. It's called self defense
Response to Exilednight (Reply #31)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 03:18 PM
B2G (7,093 posts)
33. That guy was kneeling with his hands over his head
Disgusting.
Response to Calculating (Original post)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 12:41 PM
melman (1,531 posts)
5. Context?
What could be the context that would make that sort of behavior acceptable?
Response to melman (Reply #5)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 01:32 PM
Bonx (1,166 posts)
9. Maybe he was rude to the protesters.
Response to Bonx (Reply #9)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 01:41 PM
PersonNumber503602 (1,084 posts)
11. I don't think being rude would make it acceptable
Assaulting the protesters would be another story.
Response to PersonNumber503602 (Reply #11)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 01:52 PM
Bonx (1,166 posts)
13. Yeah, he likely assaulted someone in the group, or all of them.
Otherwise he wouldn't have been assaulted. Surprising that he took on a crowd of 15 or so on his own. Must be a really crazy racist.
Response to Bonx (Reply #9)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 02:04 PM
MicaelS (6,229 posts)
16. So if you're rude to Trump supporters..
Then can assault you?
Response to MicaelS (Reply #16)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 02:12 PM
Bonx (1,166 posts)
18. That's different.
Response to Calculating (Original post)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 03:37 PM
Star Member MineralMan (87,304 posts)
36. Not enough context in that video to
draw any conclusions, really. And nobody has said it was beneficial to anything. How about coming back and replying to some of the people who have taken the time to respond to your original post? That'd be great.
You are just really really stupid Rock head.
Fuking savages to the core at the DUmp.
-
Interesting, there's not enough context in THAT video to make a judgment, yet the video or pictures of the shooting ... yeah, they're all good with that. HANG THE COP!!!
What a bunch of losers.
KC
-
Here's this guy again, Carl.
Response to Calculating (Original post)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 12:52 PM
ileus (14,702 posts)
8. people who won't take a knee aren't innocent?
Somebody finally responds:
Response to ileus (Reply #8)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 01:32 PM
DustyJoe (830 posts)
10. BeeEss
I won't take a knee in worship for any cause but at church.
My countrys flag I proudly stand for and along with millions of others shed blood for.
The kneeling cause is not the fault of 330 million countrymen, but a few government employees that need not be employed in the law enforcement profession. Protest your President, your AG, your Legislators, your Governor, Mayor that employs those unfit for the job, but don't expect the country to embrace your protests as they are divisive and dangerous. To call 330 million 'innocent' people not innocent because they won't kneel in subservience is ridiculous as those that are kneeling which to most means worshipping, in this case the flag they bemoan has failed them.
and the final post:
Response to Calculating (Original post)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 04:02 PM
Star Member jalan48 (4,209 posts)
38. Will the riots help Democrats in the upcoming election?
I can't tell any more what's sarcasm and snark, or what's not.
-
Here's this guy again, Carl.
Somebody finally responds:
and the final post:
I can't tell any more what's sarcasm and snark, or what's not.
Yeah,some like the ileus one are pretty obvious but others it is hard to tell.
-
Star Member jalan48 (4,209 posts)
38. Will the riots help Democrats in the upcoming election?
:rofl: No, (D)ipshit.
-
It gets better.
Response to Calculating (Original post)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 04:13 PM
Star Member tenderfoot (1,515 posts)
39. linked from a Trump supporters site...
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwSg1Rkxr9P8D88An4JOpAQ
Response to tenderfoot (Reply #39)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 04:15 PM
Calculating (318 posts)
41. Which matters why?
That's not even how I came across it. I actually came across this on the political discussion area of a tech related website.
Response to Calculating (Reply #41)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 04:21 PM
Star Member tenderfoot (1,515 posts)
43. TOS is why it matters...
Don't peddle right-wing talking points, smears, or sources
Do not post right-wing talking points or smears. Do not post content sourced from right-wing publications, authors, or pundits. Exceptions are permitted if you provide a clear reason for doing so that is consistent with the values of this website.
Why we have this rule: News media and the Internet are already awash with conservative propagandists attacking our candidates and our values -- we're not interested in providing them with another outlet. We understand that many of our members might hold some conservative viewpoints on isolated issues, but nobody here should be parroting hateful garbage from the RNC, the NRA, or the Family Research Council. Forum members should expect that the only time they'll have to read a right-wing smear or an article from Breitbart is when someone is pointing and laughing at it.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice
Response to Calculating (Original post)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 04:22 PM
Star Member GeorgeGist (17,752 posts)
44. This belongs in the Trump/Pence forum.
Response to Calculating (Original post)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 04:29 PM
Star Member Kingofalldems (22,031 posts)
47. This is from a Trump supporter's You Tube site.
Why are you posting Trump propaganda on DU?
I truly hope these sub human monsters suffer for eternity.
-
So the important part is not the content but it is where this particular copy of the content is linked from? Ok....
-
An actual human being is being beaten on and ganged up on, and that asshole is calling it Trump propaganda? What about trying to toss the live human being on a bonfire? Is that Trump propaganda? Look at the compassionate liberals. I hate you all.
-
Response to Kingofalldems (Reply #47)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 04:34 PM
Calculating (319 posts)
48. Really.
Would it make you feel better if I found the exact same video from somewhere else. It's a damn youtube video. There's nothing inherently political or biased about it. It's simply a recording of actual events which happened.
He's right, of course. A youtube video is a commodity, not right or left.
Response to Calculating (Reply #48)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 04:45 PM
Star Member tenderfoot (1,516 posts)
49. post where you found it.
eom
There's a definite feel of "burn the witch" to the thread right now.
-
Charlotte isn't the only place where innocents are being attacked by blm thugs...
STOCKTON (CBS13) – Stockton police are searching for the suspects in a vicious attack that happened on Friday against two teenaged sisters.
Police say a group of protestors wearing Black Lives Matter shirts held a vigil and a protest near the intersection of Pacific and Yokuts avenues.
Protestors were remembering Colby Friday, an African-American man who was shot and killed by Stockton police in August after he ignored an officer’s commands to drop his handgun.
Police say two Caucasian girls left a local restaurant and passed by the protest when they were attacked by the protestors.
What was supposed to be a peaceful protest remembering Colby Friday turned into a vicious brawl directed against two sisters, and now, investigators are looking for suspects.
“Our understanding is that it involved several out-of-towners whose intent was more than protesting,†said Ron Freitas, the Assistant District Attorney for San Joaquin County.
Stockton police say the protestors claimed to be connected with the Black Lives Matter movement and were protesting recent officer-involved shootings against blacks.
According to police, the two female victims say they felt the attack was racially-fueled because they are white.
Police are not releasing any details about what led up to the attack but say the sisters suffered non-life threatening injuries to their faces and bodies.
Stockton police say there were officers assigned to keep an eye on the protest Friday but say they did not see the attack.
http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2016/09/21/teen-sisters-hurt-during-stockton-protest-felt-targeted-because-they-are-white/ (http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2016/09/21/teen-sisters-hurt-during-stockton-protest-felt-targeted-because-they-are-white/)
note the part where the thugs were protesting the shooting of a man who ignored Police demands to drop his gun.
-
Response to Calculating (Original post)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 03:37 PM
Star Member MineralMan (87,304 posts)
36. Not enough context in that video to
draw any conclusions, really.
Rockhead, it is my fervent hope that you have to face down the same kind of savages that are running loose in your state - particularly PhDD's favorit bunch, the radical Somalis.
We'll see then how much "context" really applies.
-
Response to Blue_Tires (Reply #3)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 05:59 PM
Star Member wildeyed (9,656 posts)
58. Right?
It's just a video of some kids having a fight in a parking garage.
There was a lot of ugly back and forth last night between bystanders and protesters. I know people of all ages, races and social class who were there. It was chaotic, largely due to mishandling by the police.
Protesters were there for one reason, to get answers about the death of Keith Scott. Things got out of hand after the police used tear gas and pepper balls on protesters without warning and then shot a guy in the head at close range with a rubber bullet (we think, since no live rounds were fired by anyone, per multiple eye-witness accounts). After that, things got out of hand.
Some would like to make this conflict about black vs. white, but it is not. It is about justice-loving citizens of Charlotte demanding transparency and accountability from their public servants.
I have no words except those that should not be uttered in mixed company. :censored:
-
Exilednight (8,597 posts)
31. Yes.
If someone hits me first, I'm hitting back twice as hard, and not stopping. It's called self defense
:badass:
No dummie. I will tell you what you would do. You would bawl like baby while pissing yourself. Meanwhile the pavement apes of the BLM species would video record it and post it on their facebook page. Then kick your ass.
-
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 03:04 PM
Exilednight (8,597 posts)
31. Yes.
If someone hits me first, I'm hitting back twice as hard, and not stopping. It's called self defense
Kinda of hard to do from your Mom's basement. :loser:
-
Response to Calculating (Original post)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 06:17 PM
Star Member linuxman (1,913 posts)
67. For all the people commenting about context...
What context would excuse a group of people chasing a man down, trying to kick his head in, ignoring his pleas for mercy, and ignoring it to keep inflicting serious bodily injury and possibly death? Seriously. What could have possibly preceded this that would make you go "Huh, I guess he deserves that."?
Something tells me a group of white folks doing this to a POC wouldn't get that same benefit of the doubt. "Wait now, hang on! We don't know what he did to them! Maybe he said something mean! Maybe he assaulted every member of the group that's trying to kill him!"
Yeah, **** that.
Up pops Rex,one of the most obnoxious,stupid and just plain evil of the bunch.
Response to linuxman (Reply #67)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 06:20 PM
Rex (63,938 posts)
70. Who here is making excuses?
Sounds like a few are desperate for a certain narrative.
Response to Rex (Reply #70)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 06:23 PM
Star Member linuxman (1,913 posts)
74. If you've already read the thread and not seen it,
pointing it out again for you would be a colossal waste of time. Pretty sure that would count as a personal call-out as well.
Response to linuxman (Reply #74)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 06:25 PM
Rex (63,938 posts)
76. So nobody then, you just feel that way and cannot support your claim at all.
The OP made a certain claim with a video that shows no proof of said claim. We know these folks are rioting or protesting? Funny, some of you are the very same folks always demanding we wait for more proof of a claim...but okay, this time is different.
Response to Calculating (Original post)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 06:18 PM
Rex (63,938 posts)
68. I am curious how you know those are protestors and not just some punks
picking on someone at random?
Die slow and painfully you inhuman piece of dog shit.
-
I've seen the 'context defense' from leftists before.
It works like this - no matter how far back the evidence goes, there is always an elusive"before time" that explains away the evidence as merely an out of context reaction to something much worse done to/against them by someone or some force they dislike.
-
I suppose that if a "Trump source" found out about a terrorist plot to blow up the DNC Headquarters and told everyone about what they uncovered then libs would ignore it because it came from a "Trump source" or they didn't know the context in which the report was made?
-
I've seen the 'context defense' from leftists before.
It works like this - no matter how far back the evidence goes, there is always an elusive"before time" that explains away the evidence as merely an out of context reaction to something much worse done to/against them by someone or some force they dislike.
Or everything was "heavily edited".
-
Interesting, there's not enough context in THAT video to make a judgment, yet the video or pictures of the shooting ... yeah, they're all good with that. HANG THE COP!!!
What a bunch of losers.
KC
Yeppers! The Tulsa video is different because cops are racists, racists, racists, ...
-
Kinda of hard to do from your Mom's basement. :loser:
****wads like THIS would simply beat the hell outta Mom for not bringing enough Cheetos.
-
I suppose that if a "Trump source" found out about a terrorist plot to blow up the DNC Headquarters and told everyone about what they uncovered then libs would ignore it because it came from a "Trump source" or they didn't know the context in which the report was made?
One can only dream...
Alas, the cowards would pull an Obama and vanish somewhere their august personages would not be further inconvenienced by reality.
-
If that was a black man being beat by 15 white guys they wouldn't want context. There would be HELL! OMG they are horrific American's.
-
“Our understanding is that it involved several out-of-towners whose intent was more than protesting,†said Ron Freitas, the Assistant District Attorney for San Joaquin County.
Seems to be a constant in these cop involved shooting "protests". Someone really needs to back track the money these people used to get to these cities and go after the source. Probably Soros or some other lefty.
-
Of course, the DUmmies are practically openly defending the repulsive barbarians who ganged up on a lone man at least 8 to 1, badly beat him, took off his pants, dragged him around the garage while kicking him, and then laughed and joked about it.
Yeah, that sure seems like it must have been self- defense, all right.
The DUmmies are as bad as the attackers.
"Protesters were there for one reason, to get answers about the death of Keith Scott. "
OH, BULLS&&T! Protesters were there to engage in vandalism, violence, looting, and rioting, and wallow in how deeply they hate cops and white people.
-
Stopped by CNN by mistake, and saw on the scroll "Donald Trump says Charlotte demonstrations makes country look 'bad to the world' ".
What he actually said, " Charlotte violence makes country look 'bad to the world' ".
Well IT IS the Clinton "news" network. :thatsright:
-
Stopped by CNN by mistake, and saw on the scroll "Donald Trump says Charlotte demonstrations makes country look 'bad to the world' ".
What he actually said, " Charlotte violence makes country look 'bad to the world' ".
Well IT IS the Clinton "news" network. :thatsright:
The Clinton News Network has had a habit of late of tendentiously misquoting Trump. As you say, not a surprise.