(link at top of this page)
William769 (48,068 posts) Wed Sep 14, 2016, 05:20 PM
There's a stench coming to my town.
His royal orangeness is coming to Germain arena on Monday.
I so want to be one of the protesters that day but given my temperament and the fact that I will hit back, I am not so sure if this is a protest I should participate in.
On one hand, I feel like it is my civic duty to do everything in my power to ensure that this maniac is stopped at all costs but on the other hand, being retired law enforcement, I don't care to ever see the inside of a cell.
PHOTO: Donald Trump Packs Arena, Hillary Draws 200 at Dueling Events
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump packed an Estero, Florida arena with thousands inside and more outside for a Monday rally.
The News-Press estimated the crowd at more than 8,000 people and the heat at over 90 degrees outside the arena where attendees stood before gaining entrance to the event.
Meanwhile Hillary Clinton spoke at Temple University the same day in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. It was reportedly attended by less than 200 people. At the event targeted to millennial voters she acknowledged a need to court the youth vote, according to local NBC10 News. Clinton’s campaign launched “Pennsylvania Millennials for Hillary†aimed at showing support for boosting youth economic opportunities and dealing with college debt.....
.....By way of further comparison, Hillary Clinton held a rally at the University of South Florida on September 6 that drew a 1,500 person crowd, according to the Tampa Bay Times, while a September 9 rally for Trump in Pensacola drew 12,000, according to WTSP10 News.....
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/09/19/photo-donald-trump-draws-massive-crowd-far-more-than-hillary-clinton-in-florida/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Now, I have a question, a damned serious question.
With their web-site being the way it is--along with some other conservative web-sites--how is it possible that Breitbart gets any traffic at all?
The above took me twenty minutes to copy-and-paste because I had to keep waiting for the Breitbart page to load. I took the time only because I thought it important enough to taunt the supporters of Messalina Agrippina; otherwise, I would've just given up and gone somewhere else to read something else.
I don't understand this. While Skins's island and Manny's jackass message-board come in instantly and easily, there's way too many places representing the other point of view whose sites are slow and clunky and awkward, so bad that after the first or second time, one just doesn't bother going there any more.
And if the problem's my browser, why should I download twenty or thirty different damn browers so as to get one that will work on a conservative site? Why can't these conservative sites, like Skins's island and Manny's jackass message-board, make their sites compatible with all browsers?
Damn. I can't tell how many times this happens. For the longest time now, whenever I've seen a link to Breitbart or that place BlueStateSaint always goes to, or any link posted by our esteemed Ptarmigan, I just mutter to myself "**** it," and go on to something else.
I'm sure I'm missing out on a lot, but why the Hell are such sites so difficult to get?