The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Delmar on September 11, 2016, 07:48:59 PM
-
I just learned what alt-right is about two weeks ago, so I'm not sure I used it right in the title. Still not sure I know what it means but I thought it had a nice ring to it..
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 08:23 PM
Nuclear Unicorn (19,351 posts)
David Shuster: Expect emergency DNC meeting to CONSIDER replacement
Clarification from dem operatives @HillaryClinton pneumonia: Expect emergency DNC meeting to CONSIDER replacement. #HillarysHealth
https://twitter.com/DavidShuster/
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512410774
Giving her the boot over a simple case of pneumonia? Maybe the masterminds at the DNC know more than they're letting on. Maybe Hillary's condition is more serious than we've been led to believe.
Response to Nuclear Unicorn (Original post)Sun Sep 11, 2016, 08:26 PM
Star Member geek tragedy (64,075 posts)
2. David Shuster is a Hillary-hating troll
who all but guaranteed an indictment over the email crap based on his inside 'sources.'
Maybe he cares more about Hillary's wellbeing than you DUmmies do?
Response to Nuclear Unicorn (Original post)Sun Sep 11, 2016, 08:31 PM
Star Member democrattotheend (9,420 posts)
7. I don't know if this is a credible source
But there is an article about it here: http://bipartisanreport.com/2016/09/11/breaking-dnc-calling-emergency-meeting-to-consider-replacing-hillary-clinton-details/
Afraid to post any kind of link whatsoever because the other DUmmies might call it right-wing.
Response to Nuclear Unicorn (Original post)Sun Sep 11, 2016, 08:32 PM
Bernardo de La Paz (13,009 posts)
10. Stay calm and carry on. It's tRump operative psyOps; false story, no basis. . . . n
-
Thread nuked.
Their fear is palpable.
-
Response to Nuclear Unicorn (Original post)Sun Sep 11, 2016, 08:32 PM
Bernardo de La Paz (13,009 posts)
10. Stay calm and carry on. It's tRump operative psyOps; false story, no basis. . . . n
:rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
It's everywhere, you idiots. Yes, and your verified sources, too.
There's video. :panic: :panic: :panic:
-
Thread nuked.
Their fear is palpable.
I've never seen a nuke that looked like that before, though.
<<<wondering if it was an emergency nuke.
-
I've never seen a nuke that looked like that before, though.
<<<wondering if it was an emergency nuke.
Nuclear Unicorn considering a replacement?
-
They already started a new thread! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
themaguffin (1,466 posts) http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512410894
WTF David Shuster...? "Expect emergency DNC meeting to CONSIDER replacement..."
Why is he pushing this crap?
https://twitter.com/DavidShuster/status/775093724363784192
-
They already started a new thread! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-JA1ffd5Ms[/youtube]
-
While DU-folks' "definition" of a "right-wing" news/commentary source is that it doesn't parrot, unquestioned and unqualified, the current Lib/Prog narrative while eschewing anything R or conservative, there is nothing right-wing or conservative of mooshy-middle about Shuster. He may or may not support The SHREW, but he's a Prog. Shuster is Progs' monkey performing in Progs' circus.
I can't imagine the D Party bigwigs not having (or having had) an "Oh, crap, what if!" meeting. If D Party rules don't already spell out what should happen under what circumstances.
-
While DU-folks' "definition" of a "right-wing" news/commentary source is that it doesn't parrot, unquestioned and unqualified, the current Lib/Prog narrative while eschewing anything R or conservative, there is nothing right-wing or conservative of mooshy-middle about Shuster. He may or may not support The SHREW, but he's a Prog. Shuster is Progs' monkey performing in Progs' circus.
I can't imagine the D Party bigwigs not having (or having had) an "Oh, crap, what if!" meeting. If D Party rules don't already spell out what should happen under what circumstances.
They have very 'flexible' standards. If al-Gardiya publishes a story they don't like, it's a 'Known Reich-wing mouthpiece' but if the Islamabad Times (I kid you not) publishes some bad story about the US or a GOP Administration, it's a 'Reliable and credible source.'
-
They have very 'flexible' standards. If al-Gardiya publishes a story they don't like, it's a 'Known Reich-wing mouthpiece' but if the Islamabad Times (I kid you not) publishes some bad story about the US or a GOP Administration, it's a 'Reliable and credible source.'
"Flexible" is an apt adjective, just as "confirmation bias" is apt.