The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Karin on September 06, 2016, 08:02:14 AM

Title: A Nadinism Spotted in the Wild
Post by: Karin on September 06, 2016, 08:02:14 AM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512397711 (http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512397711)
Quote

Sun Sep 4, 2016, 04:28 PM

agnostic102 (141 posts)

Using the word witch to describe hillary clinton
   
When you know damn well they meant bitch. But these little ****ing cowards dont have the guts to use the B word on a public forum because there too chicken shit to post what they actually want to say. i admit i never had to many friends on my facebook page but as of right now im down to 19. I just do not have the patients for this shit.

Honest question - How can people be so blatant so overt when it comes to sexism and mysogyny? I know people deathly afraid of saying the N word. But somehow the words people use against Clinton in reference to her gender is mind blowing.
 

Quote



Response to agnostic102 (Original post)

Sun Sep 4, 2016, 04:31 PM

Star Member still_one (45,538 posts)

1. Either phrase is desipiciple

 :lmao:

Just try pronouncing that. 
Title: Re: A Nadinism Spotted in the Wild
Post by: BlueStateSaint on September 06, 2016, 08:16:21 AM
Is the agnostic primitive a disciple of Ol' Hopalong Bob's? :whistling:
Title: Re: A Nadinism Spotted in the Wild
Post by: Carl on September 06, 2016, 08:59:19 AM
Bitch is one of the tamer words I call the piece of shit.
Title: Re: A Nadinism Spotted in the Wild
Post by: Big Dog on September 06, 2016, 09:03:35 AM
She's a witch, but not the good kind; and a bitch, but not the good kind.

**** you, DUmmies!
Title: Re: A Nadinism Spotted in the Wild
Post by: ADsOutburst on September 06, 2016, 09:06:35 AM
Something about the apostles and the desipiciples?
Title: Re: A Nadinism Spotted in the Wild
Post by: FaC on September 06, 2016, 10:22:08 AM
Quote
Sun Sep 4, 2016, 04:28 PM

agnostic102 (141 posts)

<...>
I just do not have the patients for this shit.
<...>

What about the poor patients? Who looks after their interests??
Title: Re: A Nadinism Spotted in the Wild
Post by: Duke Nukum on September 06, 2016, 10:42:07 AM
I would never call Hillary Clinton a bitch. She is so much worse than any name I can think to call her and beside, I hardly ever use language like that. But I would call her a bitch if it were apt.

I do call her a monster and I think that is apt. But there is just so much horribleness in her that it hardly covers it.
Title: Re: A Nadinism Spotted in the Wild
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on September 06, 2016, 02:23:39 PM
Of course it's what we really mean, but on most public fora saying that will land the SJWs and Feminazis all over your ass and cause such a stink you may well get banned, because Stalin lives.

By the way, the phrase 'Nadinism in the wild' raises some very uncomfortable visions of Nadist colonies.  I shudder at the horror.
Title: Re: A Nadinism Spotted in the Wild
Post by: Karin on September 06, 2016, 02:59:20 PM
Sorry, I didn't mean to trigger you.  "Nadist colonies."   :lmao:  Oh hell no. 
Title: Re: A Nadinism Spotted in the Wild
Post by: FlaGator on September 06, 2016, 05:19:23 PM
Quote
Honest question - How can people be so blatant so overt when it comes to sexism and mysogyny?

I don't know... why don't you bring up Condi Rice on DU and ask that question to those who respond?
Title: Re: A Nadinism Spotted in the Wild
Post by: FlippyDoo on September 06, 2016, 05:33:36 PM
Speaking somewhat along the lines of sexism and misogyny I have a question. The liberals have let us know that we can no longer tell if a person is male or female even if said person is butt-ass naked with his/her/its running gear exposed for all to see. These very same liberals are making a big deal about Hitlery being the first female president. How do they know? Since you can no longer tell by looking how do they know that one out of the 44 that have been elected wasn't a woman "trapped" in a man's body and was just too classy and/or private to broadcast his/her/its affliction to the world?
Title: Re: A Nadinism Spotted in the Wild
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on September 06, 2016, 05:36:12 PM
Just try pronouncing that.

I resent the implication that I ever took that many drugs.