The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: franksolich on August 23, 2016, 12:41:48 PM
-
http://jackpineradicals.com/boards/topic/vince-foster-files-are-discovered-to-be-missing-from-national-archives/
Oh my.
The jackass primitives are going to discuss it, but otherwise, what are they going to do about it?
LiberalArkie (1092 posts) August 23, 2016 at 9:35 am
FBI files linking Hillary Clinton to the ‘suicide’ of White House counsel Vince Foster have vanished from the National Archives
Documents describing Hillary Clinton’s role in the death of White House counsel Vince Foster have vanished, Daily Mail Online has learned after an extensive investigation
Foster is believed to have shot himself with a .38 caliber revolver at Fort Marcy Park along the Potomac River on July 20, 1993
Two former FBI agents involved in the investigation tell Daily Mail Online they issued reports linking
Hillary’s tirade to Foster’s suicide
Days before his death, then First Lady ridiculed him mercilessly in front of his peers, say former FBI agents and detailed it in their report
‘You have failed us,’ Hillary told Foster, former FBI Jim Clemente told Daily Mail Online
Archived material related to the case, housed at National Archives in College Park, Md. were examined by the author to no avail
After filing a Freedom of Information request, it was determined that the agents’ reported have gone missing
Snip
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3753013/Missing-FBI-files-linking-Hillary-Clinton-suicide-White-House-counsel-Vince-Foster-vanished-National-Archives.html
Whisp (672 posts) (Reply to original post) August 23, 2016 at 9:38 am
1. I have learned these past few years that the Clintons are quite capable
of murder, singly and in bulk, so I will never again laugh at a Foster ‘joke’ or roll my eyes in disbelief that anyone would believe them to be murderers.
^^^it looks like the whiskered primitive's getting it.....but, like, thirteen years and five presidential elections too late.
How come Democrats, liberals, and primitives never come to realize something until after elections?
<<<Republican and conservative; realizes things before elections, and votes accordingly.
LiberalArkie (1092 posts) (Reply to Whisp - post #1) August 23, 2016 at 9:43 am
2. Hill tormented Foster to the point he did kill himself.
During the White House meeting, Hillary continued to humiliate Foster mercilessly, according to both former FBI agents, who spoke about the investigation for the first time.
‘Hillary put him down really, really bad in a pretty good-size meeting,’ Copeland says. ‘She told him he didn’t get the picture, and he would always be a little hick town lawyer who was obviously not ready for the big time.’
Indeed, Hillary went so far as to blame Foster for all the Clintons’ problems and to accuse him of failing them, according to Clemente, who was also assigned by the FBI to the Starr investigation and who probed the circumstances surrounding Foster’s suicide.
‘Foster was profoundly depressed, but Hillary lambasting him was the final straw because she publicly embarrassed him in front of others,’ says Clemente.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3753013/Missing-FBI-files-linking-Hillary-Clinton-suicide-White-House-counsel-Vince-Foster-vanished-National-Archives.html#ixzz4IAsYDtsJ
jwirr (294 posts) (Reply to LiberalArkie - post #2) August 23, 2016 at 9:50 am
4. What did Foster do that made her go after him that way? I don't remember.
LiberalArkie (1092 posts) (Reply to jwirr - post #4) August 23, 2016 at 10:20 am
8. Someone had to take the blame for something and it ended up being Foster.
She has a rep for pushing and pushing just like a lot of mid level managers out in the corporate world.
Whisp (672 posts) (Reply to LiberalArkie - post #2) August 23, 2016 at 9:52 am
5. or the devious mind of the slithereen set that show up for public view,
had him killed, then blamed it all on her being mean to him. so sad. so sorry. poor dear.
LiberalArkie (1092 posts) (Reply to Whisp - post #5) August 23, 2016 at 10:21 am
9. I don't really think the Clintons personally would have someone killed,
they don’t have the guts to do it. But now an aide or such, yea to make points, for sure.
Whisp (672 posts) (Reply to LiberalArkie - post #9) August 23, 2016 at 10:25 am
10. I do. She's a psycho liar. How far away could a murderer be?
arikara (217 posts) (Reply to original post) August 23, 2016 at 9:45 am
3. Didn't he shoot himself in the head twice?
Now he’s posthumously hiding his files.
Whisp (672 posts) (Reply to arikara - post #3) August 23, 2016 at 9:54 am
6. There were a lot of odd things about the incident.
And now that I don’t believe that shithead’s excuse of ‘VRWC’ for everything that goes awry in her bulldozer life, anything is possible.
Trouble (942 posts) (Reply to original post) August 23, 2016 at 9:58 am
7. If no one had anything to hide, the files wouldn't have gone missing
Geezuz gawd.
It's taken these people thirteen years to figure out there was something, uh, irregular about all that.
If it takes Democrats, liberals, and primitives thirteen years to realize all that, how long's it going to take them to realize Bozo in the White House was about the most worthless president, ever? Like maybe fifty or sixty years?
<<<finds Democrats, liberals, and primitives slow learners.
-
Sandy Burglar is laughing from hell.
(http://domania.us/Oaccess/CARTOONS/SandyBergerDocDump.gif)
-
Good observations, frank.
I, too, have noticed the jackals are saying things about their liberal heroes that, not long ago, they would have defended. This confirms to me is that liberals will shun info if it harms their causes and the people who carry out their agenda while blindly embracing anything that helps their efforts. They're even willing to accept things now they would have rejected just months ago. So their whole worldview is built upon "Here's what I want to believe; now what is it that pushes it forward and what is it I must reject?"
So things we as conservative have either known to be true or of which we should be rightly suspicious, they are now willing to accept because they believe it helps them. That may be categorized as finally accepting "truth", but it can hardly be called sincere belief. If these new "truths" (to them) suddenly don't help them tomorrow, they'll be back to rejecting them.
The primitives on Skin's island, the hillbots and the like, are no different. They've just latched onto the Dem party and will ride it wherever it takes them. In the same manner, what the party tells them is the "truth" to them. And if the party tells them to believe the opposite of what they were told to believe yesterday, then they'll happily go along without the slightest notion of their own hypocrisy.
So I'll give it to the jackals that they broken free of the party dictate. But their habit of believing what they call "truth" just for the sake of upholding what they want to believe hasn't changed at all.
.
-
Even if it was suicide, he was just doing himself before they could get to him. That way he can control how painless and quick it was. Who knows how gruesome killary would have made it.
I'm enjoying the JPRers being just as vicious as we are. :lmao:
-
There were several things odd about it.
1) He was shot twice according to one report
2) He was shot once in the back of the head according to another report
3) Gun in wrong hand with thumb on the trigger
4) NEVER found the bullet.
5) IF there was an exit wound, a bullet from a .38 (As I recall, that's what was used), (deformed as it would be) wouldn't go very far. 20-25 feet AT MOST.
6) A head wound would pour blood, but, very very little blood at the site.
7) Within 100 ft(?) of a residence occupied by a Saudi who reported hearing nothing.
I'm sure there's more and I may be wrong on some of the above. I'm not above making mistakes. For example, there was that one time back in '92 or '93.
-
There were several things odd about it.
1) He was shot twice according to one report
2) He was shot once in the back of the head according to another report
3) Gun in wrong hand with thumb on the trigger
4) NEVER found the bullet.
5) IF there was an exit wound, a bullet from a .38 (As I recall, that's what was used), (deformed as it would be) wouldn't go very far. 20-25 feet AT MOST.
6) A head wound would pour blood, but, very very little blood at the site.
7) Within 100 ft(?) of a residence occupied by a Saudi who reported hearing nothing.
I'm sure there's more and I may be wrong on some of the above. I'm not above making mistakes. For example, there was that one time back in '92 or '93.
92 or 93, do you mean Admiral Boorda or was that something else.
-
92 or 93, do you mean Admiral Boorda or was that something else.
It involved forgiving an ex-girlfriend but I corrected that mistake.
-
92 or 93, do you mean Admiral Boorda or was that something else.
Was that in 92-93? Jeez..... time flies.