The Conservative Cave
Current Events => Politics => Topic started by: SVPete on August 20, 2016, 08:16:01 AM
-
What would media say about naked Hillary statues? (http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/291992-naked-trump-statues-expose-media-bias)
By Kristin Tate, 8/19/2016
... media condemnation of the objectively vulgar statue suddenly proved non-existent. The mood in the national press was rather jubilant and lauding.
The tone of the media wouldn’t concern if bias in its coverage of the presidential election and cultural affairs in America was not already so out of control.
Picture, if you will, a naked statue representation of Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, erected (erm...) by cover of night in Times Square and on the boardwalks of Los Angeles, the sculptor’s artistic license given free reign. ...
Personally, that's a (very) mental picture I will not conjure. Nor do I find the idea/prospect of such statues amusing.
-
they would be considered sexist and hateful attacks against a woman and would be demanding at they be immediately removed by the authorities.
-
What would media say about naked Hillary statues?
I'd say, "OH GOD, MY EYES!!!!"
From the article:
... media condemnation of the objectively vulgar statue suddenly proved non-existent.
It's hard to take the author seriously when she writes "objectively <subjective value statement>".
Picture, if you will, a naked statue representation of Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama
I'd point and say, "Oh, look. There's the white part."
(http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2496/3976641160_dc380b9b7c.jpg)
-
MIND BLEACH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :panic: :puke:
-
MIND BLEACH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :panic: :puke:
Allow me to 'augment' your comment . . .
:runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: