The Conservative Cave
Current Events => Breaking News => Topic started by: mrclose on June 21, 2016, 05:16:12 PM
-
Hillary Clinton will not face indictment prior to the 2016 Presidential Election in November, federal law enforcement sources confirm to True Pundit.
More than a year ago the FBI launched a criminal investigation to determine if the former Secretary of State violated federal laws by using a home brew email server to conduct State Department business.
Agents have been investigating if Clinton received and transmitted classified or top secret emails from her home while intentionally bypassing the government’s highly-secured IT infrastructure.
But now there is an overwhelming fear among many of the approximately 30 agents and bureau personnel working on the investigation that the case is lost in a “political haystack,†sources said.
Frustrated FBI insiders are lamenting at the pace of the case and believe their intelligence gathering and analysis were beyond strong enough for a referral to the Department of Justice several months ago, sources said.
Agents are left to wonder now if their dogged research will ever see public eyes. This raises an important question: Are politicized FBI and DOJ brass running out the clock on a warranted criminal indictment prior to November?
http://truepundit.com/exclusive-no-indictment-fbi-gives-hillary-free-pass-to-election/
-
Sounds like some one really high up is stalling and stonewalling the people doing the work. The "danger" (or opportunity) is that as agents doing the work see lawlessness in the stalling/stonewalling, the possibility of significant - or massive - leaks grows.
-
Sounds like some one really high up is stalling and stonewalling the people doing the work. The "danger" (or opportunity) is that as agents doing the work see lawlessness in the stalling/stonewalling, the possibility of significant - or massive - leaks grows.
Steel on target
-
I've not seen seen that source, True Pundit before. How legit are they? I looked and couldn't find anything similar that wasn't broad speculation.
Most news sources are still wondering when/if an indictment is coming.
-
Anonymous source from an unknown publisher. Legit. :whatever:
-
I guess they're giving her 24 business hours.
-
I've not seen seen that source, True Pundit before. How legit are they? I looked and couldn't find anything similar that wasn't broad speculation.
Most news sources are still wondering when/if an indictment is coming.
I've read elsewhere that True Pundit is a less than reliable source.
I hope that they (The ones saying the source is not reliable) are right?
-
Anonymous source from an unknown publisher. Legit. :whatever:
I've read elsewhere that True Pundit is a less than reliable source.
I hope that they (The ones saying the source is not reliable) are right?
I guess they're giving her 24 business hours.
I think if there was much validity or any, that this would be breaking news everywhere.
-
Take it with a grain of salt.
-
I guess they're giving her 24 business hours.
Yes!!!
-
I think if there was much validity or any, that this would be breaking news everywhere.
Yeah, never heard of it either.
Highly doubt she will be indicted, but there's always hope.
-
Yeah, never heard of it either.
Highly doubt she will be indicted, but there's always hope.
I heard part of the bitch's speech today and she is really pushing how great Obama saved the economy and how everyone is doing better now. I think Obama is holding the indictment over her head.
-
I heard part of the bitch's speech today and she is really pushing how great Obama saved the economy and how everyone is doing better now. I think Obama is holding the indictment over her head.
From what I can tell, the Clinton Crime Family coalition is seizing on key phrases. Must be the result of polling, using words like "unstable, divisive, dangerous" to describe Trump.
Plenty of verbal ammo to fire at her. Hopefully Trump's team will capitalize at some point.
-
From what I can tell, the Clinton Crime Family coalition is seizing on key phrases. Must be the result of polling, using words like "unstable, divisive, dangerous" to describe Trump.
Plenty of verbal ammo to fire at her. Hopefully Trump's team will capitalize at some point.
Will he have the money to fire back? That seems to be the big question going forward.
-
Will he have the money to fire back? That seems to be the big question going forward.
The super PAC's will.
-
There is so much to throw at Clinton that Trump could fire a different one everyday for the next six months, but when we will hear at least some of it....... :shrug:
-
The super PAC's will.
They aren't doing much and Trump seems determined to keep pissing people off.
-
I heard part of the bitch's speech today and she is really pushing how great Obama saved the economy and how everyone is doing better now. I think Obama is holding the indictment over her head.
While investors have been focused on the perennial failed hope for a second half economic recovery, they have been missing the most salient point: the U.S. most likely entered into a recession at the end of last quarter.
That's right, when adjusting nominal GDP growth for core consumer price inflation for the average of the past two quarters, the recession is already here. But before we look deeper into this, let's first look at the following five charts that illustrate the economy has been steadily deteriorating for the past few years and that the pace of decline has recently picked up steam.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/21/the-next-recession-is-already-here-and-there-isnt-much-the-fed-can-do-commentary.html