The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dutch508 on April 05, 2016, 04:25:36 PM

Title: Road Rage Trial Update
Post by: dutch508 on April 05, 2016, 04:25:36 PM
I don't remember reading about this a year or so ago... Frank, Did we miss something?

Quote
H2O Man (55,358 posts) http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027738743

Road Rage Trial Update

“One man come in the names of love
One man come and go
One man come he to justify
One man to overthrow.”
-- U2; (Pride) In the Name of Love



April 4 is always an important date for me. I remember 1968 all too well. It actually took a struggle to get Martin Luther King, Jr., to be “officially” honored with a holiday. And I remember when, in the 1990s, during union negotiations with the county board of supervisors on a contract. We discussed holidays. When Martin Luther King’s holiday was mentioned, one republican supervisor told us we didn’t need it off, as “there aren’t many Negroes in the county.” Seriously.

I know, I know ….. I should have said, “Yeah, but we’re a communist union!”

I think it is more important to think about the accomplishments, and the meaning, of King’s life, than about his death. But, it is important to think about what he was planning, in those final twelve months of his life, and about how he was killed.

Today was also the first day of the man who shot my cousin and his son, on October 27, 2014. I think it must have weighed on my mind last night, as I would break off a tooth while sleeping last night.. Maybe it was a premonition of how brutal a day we were in store for.

The District Attorney, who I’ve known and respected for years, did an outstanding job with his opening statement. Now, I have far more, and much closer, personal relationships with defense attorneys -- and civil attorneys -- than prosecutors. But I’ve followed DA’s in a four-county region in upstate New York, and I have long considered this one to be the best. In fact, I helped run one of his re-elections, against a tea party candidate.

The defense attorney opted not to give an opening statement. I don’t know this fellow, but he seems pleasant outside of the courtroom. I appreciate that everyone is entitled to a fair trial, which demands a competent attorney to represent your best interests. He has a job to do, and I do not resent him for that.

The first witness was my cousin. He did very well on direct. The prosecutor pre-empted a topic we knew the defense attorney planned to focus on …..that my cousin, who worked as a carpenter for 33 years, and is retired in part due to physical injuries sustained on the job, at times smokes pot to ease physical pain. Now, please -- before you decide never to talk to me again because my cousin sometimes indulges in the demon weed (he doesn’t play piano, though), try to keep an open mind. His primary doctor has prescribed strong “pain-killers” for him, but he is not willing to take them. His doctor is aware that my cousin smokes pot to relieve pain, and he’s okay with it.

Indeed, on cross-examination, the defense attorney did spend a significant amount of time and energy focusing on pot. There are a heck of a lot of ways for a person to ask the same question. But this got beyond where it seemed like overkill. And it eventually got to my cousin, and he reacted with emotion.

There was then a series of other witnesses -- one gentleman who drove by, and four women who were nearby, hadn’t witnessed the shooting, but attempted first aide before the EMTs , ambulances, and state police arrived. They all told the same basic story. One mentioned something that the thug isn’t being tried for: he placed the gun at the back of my cousin’s head, but the bullet jammed, just before he sped away from the scene.

The final witness today was a BCI Investigator for the NYS Police. She was the first person to interview the murderer. Her testimony really only had just gotten started, when a series of “in chambers” discussions took place. She’ll be back on the witness stand in the morning.

Perhaps the most painful part for me today was to listen to the tape of my cousin’s 911 call for help. I’m glad that I heard, but wish that I never had. It was something that I will not soon get out of my head.

The strangest part was when, during the BCI Investigator’s testimony, a series of photos were introduced (and then projected upon a large screen). The gunman had taken a lot of blood, and smeared it strategically on himself, to indicate serious injuries. He was taken to an area hospital; upon being washed, he had actually sustain zero injuries from the two people he shot.

Other information included that he was well beyond the legal limit for intoxication, when tested more than two hours after being placed in custody, and the description of his massive, entirely illegal arsenal. This creep had an unreal amount of weapons in both his car, and his home.

I was also struck by the defendant’s almost absolute lack of emotion. On several occasions, he would sneer at my cousin. This included a look of utter contempt, when my cousin wept while describing his son dying in his arms. I am convinced that this creep actually feels that he is the real victim here, and was entitled to do exactly what he did. I found myself remembering that, after being arraigned in court, he asked the judge, “Can I leave now?” He saw no reason for them to put him in jail.

I was hoping to spend some time tonight, doing housework, paying bills, and mailing out some things to friends that I promised a while back. But my mind isn’t there. I’m not trying to make an excuse for falling behind on stuff. Yet, even in the hours since I returned home, I’ve had fifteen phone calls -- from relatives, friends, the media, etc. I don’t have the energy that I had when I was young. I will get things out to a couple DU community members. Seriously. But for now, I just keep thinking about how my cousin and his son lived life, and how that young man died. And I still can’t grasp “Why?” he died like that. Maybe I never will.

Peace,
H2O Man

hm...
No doubt the shooter is a white christian male between the ages of 20 and 35 with a job in construction a wife and two point five  children.

Title: Re: Road Rage Trial Update
Post by: franksolich on April 05, 2016, 04:38:18 PM
I don't remember reading about this a year or so ago... Frank, Did we miss something?

No, we didn't miss anything other than the time spent reading the watery primitive's saga of this event; it's been covered here, although not wholly and so some parts might've been missed.

But trust me, it's not worth it.

<<<knows.
Title: Re: Road Rage Trial Update
Post by: thundley4 on April 05, 2016, 04:39:26 PM
http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=107114.0
Title: Re: Road Rage Trial Update
Post by: Chris_ on April 05, 2016, 04:40:38 PM
The best way to get people to sympathize with your plight is to quote a shitty U2 song that nobody enjoys.
Title: Re: Road Rage Trial Update
Post by: 67 Rover on April 05, 2016, 04:40:56 PM
Quote
he placed the gun at the back of my cousin’s head, but the bullet jammed

WHAAAAT???  :o

Quote
and the description of his massive, entirely illegal arsenal.

 Yea. Illegal arsenal. Right.  ::)

Title: Re: Road Rage Trial Update
Post by: dutch508 on April 05, 2016, 06:24:00 PM
Quote
Guzy has been indicted on the following felony charges: second-degree murder, attempted second-degree murder, two counts of first-degree assault, two counts of first-degree criminal use of a firearm, two counts of second-degree criminal possession of a weapon, and one count each of third-degree criminal possession of a weapon and tampering with physical evidence.

He also was indicted on six counts of fourth-degree criminal possession of a weapon and one count of driving with a blood alcohol content above 0.08 percent, all misdemeanors (New York State- crime to have unregistered weapons- most typical 'crime' for 4th degree criminal possession of a weapon in NY)

Quote
John M. Guzy, a Chenango Co. corrections officer and retired NYPD officer charged with murder in Bainbridge, appeared in court Friday