The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: franksolich on March 25, 2016, 08:42:58 AM

Title: now, for something different.....
Post by: franksolich on March 25, 2016, 08:42:58 AM
http://www.discussionist.com/1016176380

Oh my.

I saw this on DU Jr. and immediately became intrigued; I think it's a good question.

Quote
sungauge (1,188 posts)    Thu Mar 24, 2016, 04:24 PM

SRS Question Why Do Lesbians Date, Marry Women Who Look And Act Like Men?
 
Some pea brain alerted on this question I asked on a thread.

Why do lesbians act, talk and look like men, date or marry other women who talk, act, look like men if they are not attracted to men?

I understand not all are like this but a significant portion fit this category.

Is it because they were abused by men in the past and they are really deep down missing a "man" in their life-men who they have shut off from life..

Educate me please. 

after which four photographs showing the poster's point

Seriously, think of the wymmin on Skins's island and their "husbands."

Why are they this way?

Quote
Daves Not Here Man (7,190 posts)    Thu Mar 24, 2016, 04:30 PM

1. Who's got the time to educate you??
 
You seem bummed that they don't all want you to give them the "D"...

Quote
sungauge (1,188 posts)    Thu Mar 24, 2016, 04:33 PM

2. I don't want anything from 99.9999% of the lesbians I see in real life
 
It's not like porn or or the movies.

It's a funny thread, lots of humor and the old grump the buzzy one in it, but here's the only serious answer:

Quote
GiovanniJones (5,187 posts)    Thu Mar 24, 2016, 06:19 PM

67. Daddy issues.
Title: Re: now, for something different.....
Post by: SVPete on March 25, 2016, 09:17:46 AM
The questions are leading questions, verging on self-answering. And the answers toward the questions point are entirely un-PC, contrary to Lib/Prog dogma. Since the OPer made denying his/her premise undeniable, the remaining choices were to explore the un-PC range of truthful answers, to ignore the question, or to attack the messenger. Predictably, DU/DI folk could not restrain themselves long enough to let the thread die in silence, so the very first, equally predictable, response was to attack the messenger, very personally.

On DU that set of questions would have been Alerted and Hidden within hours, if not minutes.
Title: Re: now, for something different.....
Post by: Carl on March 25, 2016, 10:01:08 AM
I have been mystified by that too.
Title: Re: now, for something different.....
Post by: Big Dog on March 25, 2016, 10:15:18 AM
Quote
Who was the idiot that put the "s" in "lisp"?

Good question!
Title: Re: now, for something different.....
Post by: 67 Rover on March 25, 2016, 11:35:28 AM
Good question!

It never is like we see in the movies.  :(
Title: Re: now, for something different.....
Post by: franksolich on March 25, 2016, 11:51:25 AM
I have been mystified by that too.

What gets me is the way these "married" couples want to have their cake and eat it too; they want it both ways.  When it comes to play-acting the role of husband and wife, they refuse to play the hard parts.  They play only the easy parts appropriate to the roles.

Like when Big Bertha's "wife" saw a mouse, and got scared.  Big Bertha's the "husband" in that "marriage," and so one assumed she'd do her husbandly duty, and get rid of the mouse.

But no, like her "wife," Big Bertha was afraid of the mouse herself.....unlike real husbands are.
Title: Re: now, for something different.....
Post by: CollectivismMustDie on March 26, 2016, 03:37:34 AM
Envy.






CMD
Title: Re: now, for something different.....
Post by: GOBUCKS on March 26, 2016, 10:03:00 AM
I'm disappointed those nauseating photos didn't include Keef's sidekick Rachel, the DUmp's favorite carpetmuncher (after our next president, the Hildebeast).
Title: Re: now, for something different.....
Post by: I_B_Perky on March 26, 2016, 06:26:33 PM
I have been mystified by that too.

Same here.  And the funny thing is the "husbands" are usually butt ugly. One would think if some gal likes the female form she would go for a looker.   :mental:
Title: Re: now, for something different.....
Post by: diesel driver on March 27, 2016, 10:41:41 AM
Same here.  And the funny thing is the "husbands" are usually butt ugly. One would think if some gal likes the female form she would go for a looker.   :mental:

Most of the lesbians I know/seen put the "UG" in "UGLY".   :puke:
Title: Re: now, for something different.....
Post by: thundley4 on March 27, 2016, 01:23:34 PM
Most of the lesbians I know/seen put the "UG" in "UGLY".   :puke:


My wife and I use to see a couple of dykes out together all the time. It was easy to tell which was the "man". She was about as ugly as GNads and built like her, too. Her partner was definitely feminine, and not too bad looking.
Title: Re: now, for something different.....
Post by: BlueStateSaint on March 27, 2016, 01:35:27 PM

My wife and I use to see a couple of dykes out together all the time. It was easy to tell which was the "man". She was about as ugly as GNads and built like her, too. Her partner was definitely feminine, and not too bad looking.

We have a lesbian couple living across the street from us.  The younger (by 10 years) of the pair has a daughter who is a friend of my daughter.  The pair aren't exactly ugly; they're not knockouts, either.
Title: Re: now, for something different.....
Post by: Patriot Guard Rider on March 27, 2016, 04:25:53 PM
We have a lesbian couple living across the street from us.  The younger (by 10 years) of the pair has a daughter who is a friend of my daughter.  The pair aren't exactly ugly; they're not knockouts, either.

A company I used to work for had a lesbian working in field service. At my going away party, (actually 4 of us), she brought her "girlfriend". Both were drop dead gorgeous. Only lesbian couple I've seen like that.