The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: CC27 on February 08, 2016, 05:03:23 PM
-
Star Member panader0 (13,156 posts)
My 24 year old daughter's comments about the Gloria Steinem BS:
"I find this very offensive! If I was running for president I think I would make it especially well known that I did not want anyone to vote for me just because I'm a woman. I would try to never talk about my gender as a trait that could help me. Although it would be a great social milestone to see a woman as president, it would be similarly as great to see a Hispanic in the White House, an Atheist, a homosexual, etc."
She has become a fine young progressive voter.
OH BS. You assholes play the woman card, race card, and so on all the time.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280112845
-
OH BS. You assholes play the woman card, race card, and so on all the time.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280112845
They're incapable of not exercising faux-victim privilege. Sometimes I think I woke up on htraE (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bizarro_World) .
CMD
-
Although it would be a great social milestone to see a woman as president, it would be similarly as great to see a Hispanic in the White House, an Atheist, a Muslim homosexual, etc."
Ding, ding, ding. We have the last one! :rofl:
-
panader0
My 24 year old daughter ... has become a fine young progressive voter.
Sounds like an airhead.
.
-
Sounds like an airhead.
.
Well, if she's such a fine progressive who would vote for a hispanic, we can count her in the Cruz/Rubio camp, right?
-
If I were a republican consultant, I would make an ad with Madeline Notsobright saying those words about women and then have the names of all the women Billy Jeff raped and Hillary ruined their lives. The vagina card was maxed out by Bill the Rapist.
-
Although it would be a great social milestone to see a woman as president, it would be similarly as great to see a Hispanic in the White House, an Atheist, a homosexual, etc."
I think it would be "similarly as great" to see a competent, person who puts America and her citizens first, and who understands and respects the Constitution in the White House, regardless of their gender, sex or religion.
-
Sounds like an airhead.
.
Hadn't thought of this 30ish year old song until your post. MTV era, Thomas Dolby.
https://youtu.be/Ll4N_pvoSXI
-
I think it would be "similarly as great" to see a competent, person who puts America and her citizens first, and who understands and respects the Constitution in the White House, regardless of their gender, sex or religion.
Thats the striking difference between them and us.
They're mostly about the who and the free shit. The personality.
We are mostly about the what. The issues.
CMD
-
I think it would be "similarly as great" to see a competent, person who puts America and her citizens first, and who understands and respects the Constitution in the White House, regardless of their gender, sex or religion.
Well Michael Luther King said we should judge a person on their character. Now the leftist judge by anything BUT that.
1. Skin color
2. Sex organ
3. Sexual persuasion
4. ANYTHING but character and competence.
-
Common sense (which I know the DUmmies lack) would tell you if you compare the two parties tickets. Which party actually has diversity and which doesn't.
-
Sounds like an airhead.
.
Unpossible, sir, air has substance. :fuelfire:
-
Common sense (which I know the DUmmies lack) would tell you if you compare the two parties tickets. Which party actually has diversity and which doesn't.
You mean the bad, bad, bad, racist, misogynist, hate-mongering party that has two hispanics, a black, and until today, a female?
Compared to the party of diversity which has an old hag, and an old white communist?