The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: fatboy on January 26, 2016, 03:49:31 PM

Title: dummies and the need for more dumb debates
Post by: fatboy on January 26, 2016, 03:49:31 PM
Quote
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 09:40 AM

AgingAmerican (9,625 posts)

When Hillary starts losing states, will new Democratic debates magically materialize?
Enquiring minds want to know...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511069390

No DUmmy, a new democrat canidate will magically materialize

Quote
Response to AgingAmerican (Original post)

Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:07 AM

Yupy (88 posts)
7. Sure,unethical behaviors...not a new thing, right? But still Bernie will win!!!

Bernie will win the DOTY 2016!!!

Quote
Response to AgingAmerican (Original post)

Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:21 AM

bowens43 (15,755 posts)
10. No. She cannot afford to be seen with Bernie.

She isn't the only person that cannot afford to be seen with Bernie. There is a whole country out there that cannot afford it either.

Not much of a campfire.
Title: Re: dummies and the need for more dumb debates
Post by: CollectivismMustDie on January 26, 2016, 09:03:50 PM
Quote
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 09:40 AM

AgingAmerican (9,625 posts)

When Hillary starts losing states, will new Democratic debates magically materialize?
Enquiring minds want to know...

Step out of the clowncar DUmmie, and keep your hands where I can see them.

(and don't bother with the faux butthurt, you've been pulled out of the car plenty of times before)

Good. Welcome to reality, however short your stay might be.

Now, it seems you have not been paying attention to the world around you. To those of us who have, there are some things that have become obvious. Things you should know about. Its absolutely crystal clear, at this point, that the dim debates have been deliberately scheduled at times when almost nobody but DUmmies will watch them. Again, this is deliberate . Whether its at a time when people aren't known to watch TV or whether its opposite other programming like football that anyone with half a brain knows will draw most of the viewers. The dim strategy is obvious, and theres only one possible explanation for it:

Dim leadership has concluded that "the less people see what we're selling, the better our chances are."

I dare any of you DUmmies to try to argue otherwise, simply because it can't be refuted: Its a fact.

So why are you asking about more debates, DUmmie?

:bigbird:

CMD
Title: Re: dummies and the need for more dumb debates
Post by: thundley4 on January 26, 2016, 09:06:54 PM
Step out of the clowncar DUmmie, and keep your hands where I can see them.

(and don't bother with the faux butthurt, you've been pulled out of the car plenty of times before)

Good. Welcome to reality, however short your stay might be.

Now, it seems you have not been paying attention to the world around you. To those of us who have, there are some things that have become obvious. Things you should know about. Its absolutely crystal clear, at this point, that the dim debates have been deliberately scheduled at times when almost nobody but DUmmies will watch them. Again, this is deliberate . Whether its at a time when people aren't known to watch TV or whether its opposite other programming like football that anyone with half a brain knows will draw most of the viewers. The dim strategy is obvious, and theres only one possible explanation for it:

Dim leadership has concluded that "the less people see what we're selling, the better our chances are."

I dare any of you DUmmies to try to argue otherwise, simply because it can't be refuted: Its a fact.

So why are you asking about more debates, DUmmie?

:bigbird:

CMD

It's also been rumored that certain dem candidates have been fed the questions that require an intelligent response. Not gonna mention any *cough* Hillary *cough* names.
Title: Re: dummies and the need for more dumb debates
Post by: CollectivismMustDie on January 26, 2016, 10:26:51 PM
It's also been rumored that certain dem candidates have been fed the questions that require an intelligent response. Not gonna mention any *cough* Hillary *cough* names.

Exactly.

Since  "Hardball with chrissy tingles" is already taken,  they should rename the dim debates "Softball with Madam Stumpy".


CMD
Title: Re: dummies and the need for more dumb debates
Post by: Duke Nukum on January 27, 2016, 09:21:02 AM
I thought Hillary already won, had all the Super Delegates, or whatever?

The DUmmies will accept a queen, as terrible as the morn and as treacherous as the sea, because they are DUmmies.

All the banned Bernie-bots will return, on bended knee, tithes in hand, begging to be let back onto the DUmp.  And Skinner will cynically cash the checks and let them in.