The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: txradioguy on January 19, 2016, 02:45:07 AM

Title: Secret Site For Disgruntled Current and Former DUmmies Gets New Rules
Post by: txradioguy on January 19, 2016, 02:45:07 AM
Wonder how long this will last?

Quote
Margaret Gallagher
January 10 at 12:59am · Midlothian, VA, United States

New rules are obviously necessary, so here goes.
1. No, this site is not going to shame Melania Trump for her choice to pose nude. If you post ANYTHING suggesting a campaign to do so? You're out of here.
2. Do not, under any circumstances make the mistake of assuming that someone is less informed than you are. That would be an enormous mistake.
3. Remember that the goal is to keep the White House. Keep the negative comments about Bernie and Hillary to a minimum. You post that you 'aren't going to vote for 'abc' if your candidate doesn't get the nod? You're out of here.
4. There is a profound difference between the Republicans and the Democrats. If *your* candidate doesn't win the nomination? Just pull the lever for the one who did and consider it a vote AGAINST the Republicans.
5.We have bigger fish to fry- We cannot allow a Republican to EVER AGAIN appoint someone to the Supreme Court.


Yeah can't have someone actually uphold the Constitution when you're trying to destroy the Nation.   :whatever:
Title: Re: Secret Site For Disgruntled Current and Former DUmmies Gets New Rules
Post by: BlueStateSaint on January 19, 2016, 05:18:21 AM
Remember what the Obamessiah said four days before he beat McLame . . . "We're four days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.Any Republican interference cannot be tolerated.

However, the wave is coming.  Between the country itching for a change in the White House and President Obama's insistence on degrading the 2nd Amendment, there's a 60-40 chance of taking the White House and increasing the Republican margin in the Senate, IMO.
Title: Re: Secret Site For Disgruntled Current and Former DUmmies Gets New Rules
Post by: txradioguy on January 19, 2016, 05:52:38 AM
Quote
Kath Heytink

I'll vote for the Donkey if necessary to keep republicans out of office. I have issues with the Democrats - like not being liberal/progressive enough for me, but they are a damn sight better than ANY republican at this point.


Quote
Kirsten Dieker Meehan

Thank you for your attempt to ameliorate the rancor and counterproductive infighting that seems to plague a variety of liberal/progressive pages lately. I hope you have better luck and greater success than I've observed elsewhere. The point you made in statement 5 is reason enough to vote for ANY democrat, regardless how one may find them lacking. Until this idea is grasped by all of us and it unites us in our endeavors, we risk finding ourselves subject to the whims of those who are TRULY at odds with our efforts and best interests.

Quote
Margaret Gallagher
 Thank you, everyone. Apparently, some people are NOT happy with these rules, which is ridiculous. And, if you have an issue with me? Balls up and tell ME, not some banned shithead.

 :lmao:
Title: Re: Secret Site For Disgruntled Current and Former DUmmies Gets New Rules
Post by: 98ZJUSMC on January 19, 2016, 06:15:32 AM
However, the wave is coming.  Between the country itching for a change in the White House and President Obama's insistence on degrading the 2nd Amendment, there's a 60-40 chance of taking the White House and increasing the Republican margin in the Senate, IMO.

I agree.  One more big terror act and that goes to 70-30.  I think the economy will do it, all by itself, and there's no blaming anyone, this time.

Cruz/whomever  Trump Cruz,  I do not care. 
Title: Re: Secret Site For Disgruntled Current and Former DUmmies Gets New Rules
Post by: FiddyBeowulf on January 19, 2016, 08:14:06 AM
Quote
2. Do not, under any circumstances make the mistake of assuming that someone is less informed than you are. That would be an enormous mistake.
This is otherwise known as "Nadining".
Title: Re: Secret Site For Disgruntled Current and Former DUmmies Gets New Rules
Post by: CollectivismMustDie on January 19, 2016, 02:23:30 PM
Quote
5.We have bigger fish to fry- We cannot allow a Republican to EVER AGAIN appoint someone to the Supreme Court.

Yeah. We'd be SO much better off, with justices that lie during confirmation and have conflicts of interest...like those that bathhouse nominated. :sarcasm:


:bigbird:

CMD



Title: Re: Secret Site For Disgruntled Current and Former DUmmies Gets New Rules
Post by: Patriot Guard Rider on January 19, 2016, 06:12:29 PM
I agree.  One more big terror act and that goes to 70-30.  I think the economy will do it, all by itself, and there's no blaming anyone, this time.

Cruz/whomever  Trump Cruz,  I do not care.

You and I agree. Trump or Cruz, it matters not to me. Either one will tweak the hell out of the DUmmies.

As an aside, I'll relay this little tidbit, but NOT in bouncy form:

My ex-wife, a naturalized citizen, has voted straight democrat since she's got the right to vote. That was about 36 years ago. THIS year, she said, in a raised voice that only she can raise, "God damn Obama. He's a f*ckin socialist. I like Trump, at least he tells it like it is".

We, my daughters and I, about fell off our chairs.

Then a cop walked up. :rofl::lol:
Title: Re: Secret Site For Disgruntled Current and Former DUmmies Gets New Rules
Post by: I_B_Perky on January 19, 2016, 06:59:29 PM
You and I agree. Trump or Cruz, it matters not to me. Either one will tweak the hell out of the DUmmies.

As an aside, I'll relay this little tidbit, but NOT in bouncy form:

My ex-wife, a naturalized citizen, has voted straight democrat since she's got the right to vote. That was about 36 years ago. THIS year, she said, in a raised voice that only she can raise, "God damn Obama. He's a f*ckin socialist. I like Trump, at least he tells it like it is".

We, my daughters and I, about fell off our chairs.

Then a cop walked up. :rofl::lol:

Didn't jump out of the bushes?   :tongue:
Title: Re: Secret Site For Disgruntled Current and Former DUmmies Gets New Rules
Post by: Patriot Guard Rider on January 19, 2016, 07:29:47 PM
Didn't jump out of the bushes?   :tongue:

 :cheersmate:
Title: Re: Secret Site For Disgruntled Current and Former DUmmies Gets New Rules
Post by: txradioguy on January 20, 2016, 04:42:28 AM
Uh-oh...say goodbye to a Bern-bot

Quote
Gregory Donley You can discontinue me from the group. I will never lend support to superbitch HRC. Anyone dumb enough to vote for her in the primary is giving the retardlican in the general the win.
Like · Reply · 1 · January 10 at 1:07am

Margaret Gallagher
Margaret Gallagher See ya.
Like · Reply · 9 · January 10 at 1:07am

Carol Donovan
Carol Donovan Don't let the door hit you on the ass on your way out....
Like · Reply · 5 · January 10 at 1:16am

Ellen Holt
Ellen Holt touche
Like · Reply · 2 · January 10 at 1:17am

Margaret Gallagher
Margaret Gallagher Carol Donovan Amazing how many people with such a strong 'moral' code can't figure out how to leave a group. Oy.
Margaret Gallagher Carol Donovan I have my moments. LOL.
Like · Reply · 2 · January 10 at 1:22am

Karin Ahlf
Karin Ahlf Gregory, YOU are the problem, not HRC.
Like · Reply · 1 · January 10 at 2:22am

Karin Ahlf btw, Using 'retard' or any conjugation of it as a put
down is very ignorant and bigoted.

It's the damn 'N' word in the disabled community!
Way to go, Gregory.
Signed, the mother of a son with disabilities.

Remember that last one the next time we see the DUmmies start going off on Conservatives.

Quote
Amy Lachowiez Swanson Amen. Sing it!!!
The S.C. Is key to EVERYTHING!!
Like · Reply · 4 · January 10 at 1:18am
Margaret Gallagher
Margaret Gallagher I have two daughters who are young adults. It must assuredly is. I cannot believe I am fighting the same fight I fought in 1973 30+ years later.
Like · Reply · 6 · January 10 at 1:20am
Jeannine Jb Coleman
Jeannine Jb Coleman Margaret Gallagher Tell me about it! Ridiculous!
Like · Reply · 2 · January 10 at 1:21am
Margaret Gallagher
Margaret Gallagher Jeannine Jb Coleman The most telling was a quote I read the other day and if I can find it I will post it. It was from a woman of all things talking about shutting down PP because that 'whole wimmen folks having the sex for pleasure is bad'. I couldn't believe it.
Like · Reply · 4 · January 10 at 1:22am
Lynne Leifer
Lynne Leifer Margaret Gallagher As I have said before, I don't want to vote for her, I do not care for her but this time I will vote for her with whatever it takes to get to the polls. Once there I will look at her name, take a deep breath and actually feel really...See More
Like · Reply · 4 · January 10 at 1:29am
Margaret Gallagher
Margaret Gallagher Lynne Leifer I think I told you I voted for Dave Brat. Only time I have EVER voted R. Why? To get rid of Cantor. It was a vote AGAINST Cantor and it worked. Brat is a sociopath, but he doesn't have the power Cantor did.
Like · Reply · 3 · January 10 at 1:30am
Amy Lachowiez Swanson
Amy Lachowiez Swanson Remember the crazy women who fought so hard against ratifying the ERA. They are still out there sabotaging every step forward for GOD's sake!!
Like · Reply · January 10 at 2:01am

Oh look...a DUmmie admitting to voter fraud. Shocked!  :whatever:

Quote
Lynne Leifer

Margaret Gallagher In Kansas we have a lot of opportunities to do the same thing. Sometimes there is only an R and you change your affiliation to vote for the least destructive or change it to vote for the least likely to beat a D if there is one running. We do what we have to do, no shame in that. I would have done the same thing you did, Cantor was awful. I actually have voted for my state rep who is an R who has managed to stay in office against the powerful Brownback/ Koch machine that ran out all the moderates. She is very good, not nearly as liberal as I would like but the dems running against her have not been impressive. She works with us for LGBT rights and is a friend from a ways back. That is an R vote that I will always cast.

^^^Once again a Dummie admitting that the ends justify the means.

Quote
Julie Revell Benjamin I

It's disgusting to note that DU has not changed from the last election, or the election before that. It's a shame the majority hasn't figured out yet that the rest of us are one-issue voters -- get the Republicans OUT. I don't want any Republican choosing those on the Supreme Court. And any "Democrat" that's okay with that is not a Democrat. He or she is a troll.

Didn't Stalin and Mao have the same kind of thought process on what made a "good Communist"?  Either you agree with me 100% or you're a troll.

Wait...we've had that problem with people claiming to be the only "real" Conservative as well.  Seems to be an issue in both parties.

Quote
Margaret Gallagher

r We cannot afford another Scalia. Those maniacs are worried about Sharia Law? Jesus, it's coming in the form of the RW evangelic movement.

Yeah because praying...defending unborn babies and not believing that gays acting like man and wife is a "marriage" is soooooo like Sharia Law.

Morons.

Title: Re: Secret Site For Disgruntled Current and Former DUmmies Gets New Rules
Post by: SVPete on January 20, 2016, 07:02:42 AM
Quote
Margaret Gallagher
Margaret Gallagher I have two daughters who are young adults. It must assuredly is. I cannot believe I am fighting the same fight I fought in 1973 30+ years later.
Like · Reply · 6 · January 10 at 1:20am

2015 - 1973 = ~30 ? :thatsright: She's too old for Common Core Math. She must've learned her Arithmetic using "New Math".

Quote
Margaret Gallagher

... Those maniacs are worried about Sharia Law? Jesus, it's coming in the form of the RW evangelic movement.

Looks like TMN has a disciple in Christophobia and Fundiephobia. Or maybe a competitor, kind of like Jesse and Sharp Al.
Title: Re: Secret Site For Disgruntled Current and Former DUmmies Gets New Rules
Post by: SVPete on January 20, 2016, 07:04:19 AM
Quote
Lynne Leifer

Margaret Gallagher In Kansas we have a lot of opportunities to do the same thing. Sometimes there is only an R and you change your affiliation to vote for the least destructive or change it to vote for the least likely to beat a D if there is one running. We do what we have to do, no shame in that. I would have done the same thing you did, Cantor was awful. I actually have voted for my state rep who is an R who has managed to stay in office against the powerful Brownback/ Koch machine that ran out all the moderates. She is very good, not nearly as liberal as I would like but the dems running against her have not been impressive. She works with us for LGBT rights and is a friend from a ways back. That is an R vote that I will always cast.

But DU-folk called Rush's "Operation Chaos" fraud?