The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Carl on January 03, 2016, 06:22:45 AM

Title: Drunken Irishmen has a blood lust
Post by: Carl on January 03, 2016, 06:22:45 AM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027492818

Quote
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:09 AM

Drunken Irishman (27,730 posts)

It's simple. The government needs to give these domestic terrorists an ultimatum: vacate in 24 hours
...or we firebomb the building. They want to play hardball? Time the federal government stop *****footing around and play hardball. We did it in Waco. We can do it in Oregon.

Quote
Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:15 AM

arcane1 (34,855 posts)
1. No.

Burning people to death who are squatting in an empty building, affecting nothing?

"We" burned children to death in Waco. Is that a good thing?


Quote
Response to arcane1 (Reply #1)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:17 AM

Drunken Irishman (27,730 posts)
2. Give them an inch and they'll take a yard.

They're terrorists. Treat 'em as such. These aren't squatters. These are people openly looking to attack the government.

Give 'em an ultimatum. If they don't accept it, well you tried.

Quote
Response to arcane1 (Reply #11)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:40 AM

Drunken Irishman (27,730 posts)
16. lol

Oh okay. You're certainly not downplaying this by just calling 'em poor wittle squatters doing no harm.

Forget that one of the terrorists left a goodbye message on YT saying he was going to die a free man.

But they're just squatters! No big deal!

Get real. Stop appeasing right-wing domestic terrorists.

Quote
Response to arcane1 (Reply #1)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:09 AM

CBGLuthier (11,923 posts)
28. Their (Waco) death is on Koresh's hands not "ours." Your kind of thinking is what motivated

Mcveigh to kill 170 people in OKC.

Quote
Response to arcane1 (Reply #37)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:33 AM

CBGLuthier (11,923 posts)
38. DQ from your post, '"We" burned children to death in Waco. Is that a good thing?'

The OP attached no value judgement along the lines of "burning children to death " as you did. Those children burned to death because their parents were religious looks who stockpiled weapons.

I think , as in Waco, the federal government must not tolerate this situation. If some of these assholes brought their children along, that is THEIR fault.

Why leftism always ends in tyranny.
Title: More Proglodytes want war
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on January 03, 2016, 07:21:02 AM
Quote
Drunken Irishman (27,730 posts)

It's simple. The government needs to give these domestic terrorists an ultimatum: vacate in 24 hours

...or we firebomb the building. They want to play hardball? Time the federal government stop *****footing around and play hardball. We did it in Waco. We can do it in Oregon.

Quote
arcane1 (34,855 posts)

1. No.

Burning people to death who are squatting in an empty building, affecting nothing?

"We" burned children to death in Waco. Is that a good thing?

Quote
Drunken Irishman (27,730 posts)

2. Give them an inch and they'll take a yard.

They're terrorists. Treat 'em as such. These aren't squatters. These are people openly looking to attack the government.

Give 'em an ultimatum. If they don't accept it, well you tried.

If they were terrorists you'd be lecturing us about how they have grievances and cautioning against blowback and then demanding we import 20,000 young men from their homeland without vetting them.

Quote
SciFiRK (43 posts)

5. The PTB created this situation

when they didn't go after those idiots that pointed guns at the Federal Officers. Someone said they were trying to save lives, course it would have been a lot different if they weren't white.

Quote
Drunken Irishman (27,730 posts)

8. Agreed. It's why they can't back down now.

If they do, they'll keep pushing and pushing until shit really gets real.

9/11 was pretty real and all you assholes did was tell us to stand down.

Quote
sarisataka (6,051 posts)

21. Skip the middle men

Don't militarize the police- just use the military on criminals.

Excuse me, I was looking for a progressive site I visit. I thought it was here but I seem to be mistaken.

Quote
Drunken Irishman (27,730 posts)

23. We're not talking criminals. We're talking terrorists.

Do you think we should kumbaya 'em out? Hell, the only reason they've done this is because we backed down in Nevada and allowed 'em to get the impression we won't take the fight to them.

Quote
sarisataka (6,051 posts)

30. So now we can

Declare certain criminals, who are U.S. citizens on U.S. soil, terrorists? Thereby deny them all Constitutional rights and simply execute the lot?

About that progressive site...

Quote
Drunken Irishman (27,730 posts)

40. How is it denying them their constitutional right?

They're illegally holed up in a federal building.

What is progressive about letting anti-government terrorist organizations get away with their bullshit? What is your solution? Just smile and wave at 'em?

Quote
sarisataka (6,051 posts)

45. Typically

People who break the law are arrested. Then then face trial for their crimes but have rights enumerated in Articles 4-7 of the Bill of Rights, among other rights of the accused. The deprivation of these rights in some high profile cases has led to nation wide protests.

Is there a statute that says 'firebomb people holed up in a building'?

I eould suggest following normal SOP for people who have barricaded themselves in a building. This is hardly the first such incident.

^ A regular pro-2nd Amendment poster.

It's weird how the pro-gunners are anti-violence and the anti-gunners are pro-violence, don't you think?

Quote
doc03 (15,817 posts)

32. I suppose all the Republican a---holes running for president and

Faux News will be there by morning. Hannity will try to incite violence.

Hannity will have to work mighty hard to catch up with your fellow Proglodytes.

Quote
LonePirate (2,783 posts)

35. Once they have been convicted of terrorism, they will lose their gun rights. How delicious!

I say we pipe in some rap music because these assholes are racists, too.

And how do we know they're racist?

BECAUSE THEY'RE WHITE!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027492818
Title: Re: Drunken Irishmen has a blood lust
Post by: txradioguy on January 03, 2016, 07:21:47 AM
What's happening in Oregon?
Title: Re: Drunken Irishmen has a blood lust
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on January 03, 2016, 07:28:36 AM
What's happening in Oregon?

http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=105931.0
Title: Re: Drunken Irishmen has a blood lust
Post by: txradioguy on January 03, 2016, 07:32:48 AM
http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=105931.0
Imagine if Conservatives had suggested a drone strike on an Occupy tent city?
Title: Re: Drunken Irishmen has a blood lust
Post by: landofconfusion80 on January 03, 2016, 07:41:19 AM
Imagine if Conservatives had suggested a drone strike on an Occupy tent city?
Waste of a perfectly good hell fire missile. Most of those tents were empty and the occupiers went back to mom's basement at dusk
Title: Re: More Proglodytes want war
Post by: SVPete on January 03, 2016, 09:12:15 AM
If they were terrorists you'd be lecturing us about how they have grievances and cautioning against blowback and then demanding we import 20,000 young men from their homeland without vetting them.

9/11 was pretty real and all you assholes did was tell us to stand down.

^ A regular pro-2nd Amendment poster.

It's weird how the pro-gunners are anti-violence and the anti-gunners are pro-violence, don't you think?

Hannity will have to work mighty hard to catch up with your fellow Proglodytes.

And how do we know they're racist?

BECAUSE THEY'RE WHITE!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027492818

Are you suggesting that DU-folk define terrorism by who they hate? I'm shocked! Shocked!
Title: Re: Drunken Irishmen has a blood lust
Post by: Zathras on January 03, 2016, 10:21:05 AM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027492818

Why leftism always ends in tyranny.

Because it requires tyranny to implement all that they wish to do to America and her citizenry. Liberalism, as it is practiced today in America, is an anathema to freedom and prosperity and, to be implemented in full, must be done at the point of a gun to make it work.
Title: Re: Drunken Irishmen has a blood lust
Post by: Chris_ on January 03, 2016, 10:34:48 AM
Riots in Ferguson: MOSTLY PEACEFUL
Riots in Baltimore: MOSTLY PEACEFUL
Ranchers occupy remote hut: OREGON UNDER ATTACK!

Consistency isn't a strong point when it comes to DU.
Title: Re: Drunken Irishmen has a blood lust
Post by: CollectivismMustDie on January 03, 2016, 02:10:37 PM
Riots in Ferguson: MOSTLY PEACEFUL
Riots in Baltimore: MOSTLY PEACEFUL
Ranchers occupy remote hut: OREGON UNDER ATTACK!

Consistency isn't a strong point when it comes to DU.

Except that they're consistently wrong.  :-)




CMD


Title: Re: Drunken Irishmen has a blood lust
Post by: franksolich on January 03, 2016, 06:48:38 PM
comment 3006:
http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=81827.3000
Title: Re: Drunken Irishmen has a blood lust
Post by: Carl on January 03, 2016, 07:27:05 PM
comment 3006:
http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=81827.3000

Ah yes,another impotent little whelp.