grasswire (44,216 posts) http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251916437
The law suit is genius. Pure genius.
DISCOVERY.
Hillary people under oath.
Hillary campaign emails in evidence.
Not enough popcorn in the world for this.
DISCOVERY.
grasswire (44,216 posts)
1. Sanders' lawyers need to ask the judge IMMEDIATELY to preserve evidence...in the Hillary campaign.
No deleting emails.
No scrubbing servers.
NOW.
peacebird (11,826 posts)
2. I think they tried with that with Hillary & her aides before... Not sure it worked out so well..
OilemFirchen (3,331 posts)
7. What the ****?
Which "Hillary people"? What emails?
Who are the parties in this suit?
grasswire (44,216 posts) http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251916437
The law suit is genius. Pure genius.
Sounds like Judy is firmly in the Sanders camp. The disappointment is going to be epic.
This going to be epic.
Indeed. And with the theft accusations, ninja lawyers, and the DNC's inability to 'play fair' with the debates - there is no way Sanders and Clinton are going to 'kiss and make up' once HRC is officially declared the nominee.
And that means most of the Sanders supporters aren't going to either. It'll be awesome if Sanders tosses his support to whoever is running on the official CPUSA ticket after he loses. So much chaos will ensue.
grasswire (44,216 posts)
1. Sanders' lawyers need to ask the judge IMMEDIATELY to preserve evidence...in the Hillary campaign.
No deleting emails.
No scrubbing servers.
NOW.
Laaazerhaus on the case? :whistling:
Now, franksolich is no attorney or other sort of legal professional, and so maybe that's why I'm confused.
Since when is the wronging party allowed to sue the wronged party?
I refer one to this headline of a story giving the details:
Sanders Campaign Penalized by DNC After Improperly Accessing Clinton Voter Data
Please notice; it was the Bernie bullies who "improperly accessed" Messalina Agrippina's stuff.
And they're allowed to sue even though they were the ones who did something wrong, illegal, immoral, unethical?