The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: CC27 on December 04, 2015, 05:55:18 PM

Title: I admit--I wasn't very accurate on my original speculation. Trumad
Post by: CC27 on December 04, 2015, 05:55:18 PM
Quote
trumad (40,437 posts)

I admit--I wasn't very accurate on my original speculation. Allow me to try again.


OK--- I do believe that that the suspects were inspired by ISIS. Inspired but not card carrying members.

I think they were gearing up for some pretty serious shit but jumped the gun because something set Syed Farook off at his workplace.

No idea what it was---but he left the party pissed and returned to wreak havoc. I don't think that was the original plan.

Let's review: I do think they were about to do some serious terrorist shit --no doubt. I think the the dude got pissed at the event about something, went home, got his wife and returned for mayhem.

If that was the plan all along---then they are lousy terrorists. Don't get me wrong---killing 14 people is pretty destructive---but Adam Lanza at Sandy Hook killed 26 and he wasn't classified a terrorist.

So is this a case of going postal---or is this a full on terrorist attack---or both?

Side note: I'm not minimizing terrorism--personally I think all mass shootings like Sandy Hook are Terrorism.

DUmp is never accurate.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027416393
Title: Re: I admit--I wasn't very accurate on my original speculation. Trumad
Post by: 98ZJUSMC on December 04, 2015, 06:03:44 PM
 ::)
Title: Re: I admit--I wasn't very accurate on my original speculation. Trumad
Post by: Patriot Guard Rider on December 04, 2015, 06:04:49 PM
Quote
I admit--I wasn't very accurate on my original speculation.

The DUmp had a collective orgasm when this happened hoping against hope, praying if you will, the shooters were right-wing, tea party, republican racists.

That didn't work out so good, did it DUmmies?

Meanwhile, those of us on the right heard the name and immediately knew it was an islamic attack. Why it took the gov't this long to say it is beyond me, but, a guess. They did everything they could to prove it wasn't, but it was.

To paraphrase Mr. Spock: "When all evidence is considered, and all possibilities have been eliminated, what is left, no matter how impossible or improbable, is the truth".
Title: Re: I admit--I wasn't very accurate on my original speculation. Trumad
Post by: Carl on December 04, 2015, 06:14:10 PM
No truemud,you are just a completely ignorant piece of dog shit.
Title: Re: I admit--I wasn't very accurate on my original speculation. Trumad
Post by: Delmar on December 04, 2015, 07:18:21 PM
Quote
No idea what it was---but he left the party pissed and returned to wreak havoc. I don't think that was the original plan.

Let's review: I do think they were about to do some serious terrorist shit --no doubt. I think the the dude got pissed at the event about something, went home, got his wife and returned for mayhem.

What I figure happened is that he left the party angry because he started shooting his mouth off because he couldn't contain his contempt any longer and he knew he was going to attack soon.  He was about to bust with excitement.  I heard that it was the same way with the 9/11/2001 terrorists--as the day of the attack approached, they got more and more bold with talk about how pretty soon blood was going to be running in the streets and the like.

The left is trying to push the laughable workplace violence angle.
Title: Re: I admit--I wasn't very accurate on my original speculation. Trumad
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on December 04, 2015, 07:22:34 PM
Going "postal"? Isn't that a hate crime against the government?
Title: Re: I admit--I wasn't very accurate on my original speculation. Trumad
Post by: miskie on December 04, 2015, 07:38:13 PM
No, DUmbass. This is Islamic Terrorism - it was planned and executed. The only thing that "went wrong" is the terrorists were intercepted before they got to their second target.

Of course, you know the problem with that, is it is yet another custard pie in the face of BHO.

It was just a week before he was crowing about how safe we all are, there is no Islamic terrorism threat in the United States yadda-yadda. You know as well as I do that this pair was armed to the teeth, right under the noses of DHS.

You also know they weren't operating in a vacuum.

Amassing that much ordinance in a year on your own isn't easy. They got many of those materials though "safe" channels.
Title: Re: I admit--I wasn't very accurate on my original speculation. Trumad
Post by: CollectivismMustDie on December 04, 2015, 08:11:30 PM
Quote
trumad (40,437 posts)

I admit--I wasn't very accurate on my original speculation. Allow me to try again.

Hmm. Let me help you with that:

Quote
trumad (40,437 posts)

I admit--I am an idiot.

There. All better. Now put your helmet back on and go play in the outdoor sandbox.


CMD

Title: Re: I admit--I wasn't very accurate on my original speculation. Trumad
Post by: Delmar on December 04, 2015, 08:54:09 PM
Quote
So is this a case of going postal---or is this a full on terrorist attack---or both?

Neither. 

Quote
Despite this, the CNN anchor wondered, “I just have to ask you, could there be something else, anything else, that could have explained her involvement? Something like a postpartum psychosis?” Former FBI profiler Jim Clemente calmly told Burnett that “postpartum psychosis... is typically internal.”  - See more at: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/scott-whitlock/2015/12/04/cnn-stunner-erin-burnett-asks-if-postpartum-psychosis-led#sthash.A6cXHK39.dpuf

These leftists don't seem to care how big of fools they make of themselves.
Title: Re: I admit--I wasn't very accurate on my original speculation. Trumad
Post by: USA4ME on December 04, 2015, 09:18:04 PM
Quote from:
trumad

I admit--I wasn't very accurate on my original speculation.

Save that line on speed C&P. You could have used it for countless of your past postings and, given your track record, will no doubt need it countless times in the future.

.
Title: Re: I admit--I wasn't very accurate on my original speculation. Trumad
Post by: landofconfusion80 on December 04, 2015, 09:33:33 PM
(http://cdn1.theodysseyonline.com/files/2015/06/28/635711292497697119473611858_tumblr_inline_nbc8y1raWO1qhgb5g.jpg)
Title: Re: I admit--I wasn't very accurate on my original speculation. Trumad
Post by: SVPete on December 04, 2015, 10:37:34 PM
Quote
trumad (40,437 posts)
...
No idea what it was---but he left the party pissed and returned to wreak havoc. I don't think that was the original plan.
...

Doubling down on stupid ... sigh ...

So, in the half hour or so between leaving the party and returning with guns blazing, Farook collected his GF, got his handguns, got his friends rifle, modified them to shoot full automatic and to accept a larger capacity magazine, got the explosives, built the pipe bombs, got the RC cars, rigged up for remote triggering the explosives, and got the Kevlar vests?

We know how fast Superman is, but Farook and Malik aren't that fast. TrulyMud's fallback stupidity is more absurd than his original stupidity!
Title: Re: I admit--I wasn't very accurate on my original speculation. Trumad
Post by: SVPete on December 05, 2015, 07:30:03 AM
Hoping this works ...

Here's a good theme song for DU folks after one of their grave-dancing-in-advance debacles:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhiGFr4263I


I know, the song and band are too classy, but "You know you wrong," DU-folk!