The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: txradioguy on December 02, 2015, 04:15:12 AM

Title: So appeasing terrorists is 'in' now?
Post by: txradioguy on December 02, 2015, 04:15:12 AM
Quote
ck4829 (16,546 posts)

So appeasing terrorists is 'in' now?

Senate Republicans are sticking with their plans to use a budget procedure this week to repeal major portions of the Affordable Care Act, with a provision to defund Planned Parenthood, site of a deadly attack in Colorado on Friday.

The procedure, known as budget reconciliation, would allow the Senate to pass the measure with just 51 votes, rather than the 60 it usually takes to break a filibuster, making it easy for Republicans to put legislation on President Obama’s desk, although he’s expected to veto it. The Planned Parenthood provision was added to the Obamacare repeal measure earlier this year in response to the videos showing executives from the organization discussing the sale of fetal tissue, although Planned Parenthood has said it did nothing illegal.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/12/01/senate_gop_on_track_to_defund_planned_parenthood.html

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027400505

Look who shows up.

Quote
Buzz Clik (33,274 posts)
2. Appeasing the terrorists? Hyperbole much?

Depends on who is accused of doing the appeasing actually Buzzy.  You and your fellow Libtards have been appeasing terrorists for decades.

Quote
ck4829 (16,546 posts)

3. Hyperbole is what Carly Fiorina said

Quote
Buzz Clik (33,274 posts)

4. No, she ****ing lied. The title of the OP is pure hyperbole (at best)

Where is your proof she lied.  The video backs her up.

Quote
11 Bravo (18,470 posts)

5. Do you consider clinic shooters and bombers to be terrorists?

If so, do you believe that defunding PP will be giving them exactly what they want (aka appeasing them)?

I don't find the phrase particularly hyperbolic in this instance.

Oh look Stolen Valor chimes in.  Hey stupid we still don't know that PP was his target.  And if it was...why was he shooting at people OUTSIDE the building and not killing everyone inside?

You should stick to what you know...making up fake stories about your heroics at Hamburger Hill.

Quote
Buzz Clik (33,274 posts)

6. For the love of God.

Are you really going to argue against my point with that?

Sweet jesus, this place is in decay.

And yet you choose to stay there and help stink the place up.



Title: Re: So appeasing terrorists is 'in' now?
Post by: diesel driver on December 02, 2015, 04:53:24 AM
Basically, the Republicans will use the same procedure to pass a budget the Dimrats used to pass Odumbasscare, and DUmmies don't like it.

Boo freaking hoo!!! :tongue:

At least they don't have to pass it to see what's in it.
Title: Re: So appeasing terrorists is 'in' now?
Post by: Carl on December 02, 2015, 05:43:31 AM
How do you like your ilk dirt doctor buzz?
Title: Re: So appeasing terrorists is 'in' now?
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on December 02, 2015, 06:58:33 AM
I remember after the Muzzies tried to shoot up Garland TX the Proglodytes said that if there weren't any inflammatory cartoons then there wouldn't be any attacks over inflammatory cartoons.
Title: Re: So appeasing terrorists is 'in' now?
Post by: SVPete on December 02, 2015, 07:00:47 AM
Wow! I've been Duck-Duck-Go-searching for info about the shooter, what he did (details, not the obvious fact that he killed 3 people without doing the world the favor of killing himself) and his motivation. Very. Little. The media "silence" on these points the past couple of days has been deafening.

So, how do DU-folk know the shooter was a terrorist attacking PP (yet so disoriented that every person he shot was outside of PP's building, and not one PP employee or patient was injured)? I've seen zero evidence the shooter was at all religious - any religion, not just Christian. I've seen zero evidence he had ties to or associations with any Pro-Life organization or group. Is their divining rod made from an exotic hardwood? Do I need to switch search engines?
Title: Re: So appeasing terrorists is 'in' now?
Post by: franksolich on December 02, 2015, 07:09:41 AM
Basically, the Republicans will use the same procedure to pass a budget the Dimrats used to pass Odumbasscare, and DUmmies don't like it.

Boo freaking hoo!!! :tongue:

Uh huh.

The primitives could never understand the two-edged sword; they always think only their side of the blade is sharp.

<<<could never figure out why primitives are so stupid.
Title: Re: So appeasing terrorists is 'in' now?
Post by: FiddyBeowulf on December 02, 2015, 07:32:05 AM
Wow! I've been Duck-Duck-Go-searching for info about the shooter, what he did (details, not the obvious fact that he killed 3 people without doing the world the favor of killing himself) and his motivation. Very. Little. The media "silence" on these points the past couple of days has been deafening.

So, how do DU-folk know the shooter was a terrorist attacking PP (yet so disoriented that every person he shot was outside of PP's building, and not one PP employee or patient was injured)? I've seen zero evidence the shooter was at all religious - any religion, not just Christian. I've seen zero evidence he had ties to or associations with any Pro-Life organization or group. Is their divining rod made from an exotic hardwood? Do I need to switch search engines?
The cop he shot was also a Christian pro-life pastor.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/police-officer-killed-at-planned-parenthood-was-pro-life-christian-pastor