The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: tuolumnejim on November 29, 2015, 11:49:59 PM

Title: Break out the chicken wire, an open evaluation of the NIST WTC 7 collapse model
Post by: tuolumnejim on November 29, 2015, 11:49:59 PM
An idiot telling idiots what didn't happen.  :lmao:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/113510859

The OP is just a C&P of pure crap.
Title: Re: Break out the chicken wire, an open evaluation of the NIST WTC 7 collapse model
Post by: freedumb2003b on November 30, 2015, 01:28:59 AM
>>The study is being crowd-funded by the nonprofit organization Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. <<

IOW real scientists won't get near these conspiracy theorist nutjobs.
Title: Re: Break out the chicken wire, an open evaluation of the NIST WTC 7 collapse model
Post by: tuolumnejim on November 30, 2015, 06:54:31 AM
I should have posted the links the DUmmie thought we're relative.  :rotf: :fuelfire:

http://www.wtc7evaluation.org/
http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=d03bf3ffcac549c7dc7888ef5&id=d5e38f3000&e=
Title: Re: Break out the chicken wire, an open evaluation of the NIST WTC 7 collapse model
Post by: Carl on November 30, 2015, 08:13:14 AM
Quote
Response to whitefordmd (Reply #4)

Mon Nov 30, 2015, 08:49 AM

Star Member William Seger (6,650 posts)
8. The study is already biased before it begins

The announcement of the study should have come with a spoiler alert because it also announces the result they intend to get: They intend to disprove the NIST "probably cause" hypothesis so they can use that result for the express purpose of recruiting new cult members. Fiddling with a computer model until it produces the results you want is not that hard, which is the criticism that "truthers" level against the NIST model in the first place, so I think it's pretty easy to predict how this will play out.

No shit but you half wits slobber all over them when it comes to gloBULL warming.
Title: Re: Break out the chicken wire, an open evaluation of the NIST WTC 7 collapse model
Post by: 98ZJUSMC on November 30, 2015, 08:44:02 PM
Quote
Response to whitefordmd (Reply #4)

Mon Nov 30, 2015, 08:49 AM

Star Member William Seger (6,650 posts)
8. The study is already biased before it begins

The announcement of the study should have come with a spoiler alert because it also announces the result they intend to get: They intend to disprove the NIST "probably cause" hypothesis so they can use that result for the express purpose of recruiting new cult members. Fiddling with a computer model until it produces the results you want is not that hard, which is the criticism that "truthers" level against the NIST model in the first place, so I think it's pretty easy to predict how this will play out.

The Theory of Everything Leftist. :whistling:

Quote from: Carl on November 30, 2015, 08:13:14 AM
No shit but you half wits slobber all over them when it comes to gloBULL warming.

:yahoo: :hi5:  Of course, they'll never accept a contrary result.


Quote
wildbilln864 (12,980 posts)
9. unike NIST

They will publicly release their modeling data for scrutiny.
"Fiddling with a computer model until it produces the results you want is" exactly what NIST did! But you can't see their data used. 


Quote
Response to wildbilln864 (Reply #9)Mon Nov 30, 2015, 07:26 PM
Star Member William Seger (6,652 posts)
10. If the study shows that fire could have destroyed WTC7

... would you accept that?

(http://cdn1.bigcommerce.com/server700/236bd/products/94/images/229/small_crickets__02011.1387939648.1280.1280.jpg)

As usual....
Title: Re: Break out the chicken wire, an open evaluation of the NIST WTC 7 collapse model
Post by: Ptarmigan on November 30, 2015, 09:14:19 PM
 :mental: :mental: :mental: :mental: :mental: