The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Carl on November 27, 2015, 10:15:21 AM
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027386469
Fri Nov 27, 2015, 10:54 AM
AZ Progressive (2,127 posts)
Is this a serious problem?
Trifecta = holding the governor seat, a majority in the state house, and a majority in the state senate. This is as of November 2nd.
(https://ballotpedia.org/wiki/images/9/96/Trifectas_Nebraska.png)
see more info from the source: https://ballotpedia.org/Gubernatorial_and_legislative_party_control_of_state_government
You just can`t grasp the reality of things can you?
Response to AZ Progressive (Original post)
Fri Nov 27, 2015, 11:08 AM
tabasco (20,789 posts)
3. Of course, lots of stupid voters is a big problem.
The goal of republicans is the same at the state level as at the federal level - enrich the wealthy and screw the poor. The mass media - owned by the plutocrats - have dumbed down and brainwashed a large portion of the American public.
-
The goal of republicans is the same at the state level as at the federal level - enrich the wealthy and screw the poor.
This actually seems to describe Barack Insane Obama's goals and policy to a tee. If Obama helped any poor people, it was an accident.
The mass media - owned by the plutocrats - have dumbed down and brainwashed a large portion of the American public.
This is the same mass media that never once questioned Obama in 2008 and continues to not question him very much to this day. This is the media who let Obama get away with running on a platform of "Hope" and "Change" without ever asking Obama what that even means.
Suck it, DUmmie, you are describing yourself.
-
tabasco
The mass media - owned by the plutocrats - have dumbed down and brainwashed a large portion of the American public.
I keep seeing this "What liberal media?" over on the island. But the media *is* liberal, and it's easy enough to prove.
Here's a question for you, primitives. I'd love to ask you there, but I can't. So pick up on it and answer it over there.
In order for "the mass media - owned by the plutocrats" to get out their message, they have to have mouthpieces, right? The main mass media is ABC, NBC, and CBS. Of that, there is no debate.
Here are the names of the evening news "mouthpieces" for these networks:
- David Muir
- Lester Holt
- Scott Pelley
Which one of these voted for Romney for President in 2012? How about McCain, did one of them vote for him in 2008? How about Bush43, any of the 3 vote for him either time?
Com'n, answer the question.
Because I guarantee you every one of them voted the exact same way the last 4 elections: Gore, Kerry, Obama, Obama. That's because David, Lester, and Scott are all liberals.
.
-
Fri Nov 27, 2015, 10:54 AM
AZ Progressive (2,127 posts)
Is this a serious problem?
Yes, you posting on the internet without parental supervision is a serious problem.
-
Response to AZ Progressive (Original post)
Fri Nov 27, 2015, 11:08 AM
tabasco (20,789 posts)
3. Of course, lots of stupid voters is a big problem.
The goal of republicans is the same at the state level as at the federal level - enrich the wealthy and screw the poor. The mass media - owned by the plutocrats - have dumbed down and brainwashed a large portion of the American public.
And democrats want to screw the middle class to enrich the rich and poor. At least with the GOP, I have a chance to keep some more of the money I make.
As for the poor... **** the poor. 65 percent ain't worth shit and the remaining ones will not stay poor for long. Want to solve the problem of the poor? Quit feeding and housing them. The ones that deserve to live will make it, the rest will die. Why should we subsidize a behavior that we want to eliminate? Yes dummies, I am a cold hearted bastard. I have been poor. Made me want to do the things to not be poor. I did those things and now I am not poor.
-
And democrats want to screw the middle class to enrich the rich and poor. At least with the GOP, I have a chance to keep some more of the money I make.
As for the poor... **** the poor. 65 percent ain't worth shit and the remaining ones will not stay poor for long. Want to solve the problem of the poor? Quit feeding and housing them. The ones that deserve to live will make it, the rest will die. Why should we subsidize a behavior that we want to eliminate? Yes dummies, I am a cold hearted bastard. I have been poor. Made me want to do the things to not be poor. I did those things and now I am not poor.
the problem with poverty is that "poor" is just a catch-all phrase. What makes poor? let's find out...
poor life choices
poor financial choices
poor behavior
poor choices in friends
Quoting the always lovely Dolly Parton "One is only poor if they choose to be"
-
And democrats want to screw the middle class to enrich the rich and poor. At least with the GOP, I have a chance to keep some more of the money I make.
As for the poor... **** the poor. 65 percent ain't worth shit and the remaining ones will not stay poor for long. Want to solve the problem of the poor? Quit feeding and housing them. The ones that deserve to live will make it, the rest will die. Why should we subsidize a behavior that we want to eliminate? Yes dummies, I am a cold hearted bastard. I have been poor. Made me want to do the things to not be poor. I did those things and now I am not poor.
Preach it, brother!!! Damned right!!! :II:
Hi 5. :hi5:
What I don't get is DUmmies preference for evolution over creation. One of the main premises of evolution is "natural selection", aka, "survival of the fittest".
I'm all for it when it comes to liberals fending for themselves. Should make for some great entertainment. :popcorn:
-
I don't remember this being a problem for the Libtards when the Dems controlled both houses of Congress and the White House.
-
Since USA4ME brought it up about the lib media it reminds me of something.
I come across tons of examples of lib media bias, but I hardly ever reference it.
I just assume everyone on our site would be bored by being reminded about something they know for a fact.
-
Nobody had a good answer over there except "people are stupid." The same way they explain black conservatives. "They're insane." Has anybody, anywhere been so bad at opposition research/understanding?
-
Nobody had a good answer over there except "people are stupid." The same way they explain black conservatives. "They're insane." Has anybody, anywhere been so bad at opposition research/understanding?
They don't do opposition research, because.
They KNOW how we are, even though they don't and know so much that isn't so (hat tip RR)
-
Response to AZ Progressive (Original post)
Fri Nov 27, 2015, 11:08 AM
tabasco (20,789 posts)
3. Of course, lots of stupid voters is a big problem.
The goal of republicans is the same at the state level as at the federal level - enrich the wealthy and screw the poor. The mass media - owned by the plutocrats - have dumbed down and brainwashed a large portion of the American public.
...said the person who will eventually be voting for one of the biggest corporate whores ever. See: Clinton Foundation.
Cindie
-
tabasco (20,789 posts)
3. Of course, lots of stupid voters is a big problem.
I have to agree with the DUmbass. There are lots of stupid voters....in California, Connecticut, Delaware, Oregon, Rhode Island and Vermont. They're the ones with one party Democrat rule after all.
-
I have to agree with the DUmbass. There are lots of stupid voters....in California, Connecticut, Delaware, Oregon, Rhode Island and Vermont. They're the ones with one party Democrat rule after all.
Don't forget NYC . . . :whistling:
-
Progressive: That map worry you a little bit? I cannot wait until after Obama's presidency. It's going to be ruby red for years, and YEARS to come. We'll tell our children's children's children how stupid the masses in '08, and '12 were. Anyone hanging around the area from that era will hang their heads in shame, and cry.
-
Don't forget NYC . . . :whistling:
And Detroit, a perfect example of how horrible lib policies affect American culture, values and traditions.