The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: tuolumnejim on November 10, 2015, 10:54:04 AM
-
I see now when votes are counted in a mostly conservative area and the commies don't win there must be fraud? :mental: Hey DUmbshits how about what happened during the 2012 election and in libtard districts there was not even a single vote for the GOP ticket? Oh thats right it was the will of the people. :banghead:
Link (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027330983)
Dem2 (274 posts)
Analysis Of Kentucky Election Results Indicates Fraud
snip
But the evidence that the Kentucky governor’s race was rigged doesn’t stop there. Another elections watchdog, Richard Charnin, who holds a Masters Degree in Applied Mathematics just published preliminary results of his analysis of the cumulative vote shares in the Kentucky governor’s race, finding that the “cumulative vote shares indicate likely fraud.â€
In explaining the analysis process, Charnin wrote:
“I downloaded precinct vote data for the largest 25 KY counties and five smaller counties (view the spreadsheet and the graphs below). Downloading all 120 counties is a time consuming process, so I expect to download about 20 more over the next few days. The objective is to view the effects of county/precinct size on the cumulative vote share trend. Since the largest counties are usually heavily Democratic, the consistent pattern of Republican Governor candidates gaining share from small to large precincts is counter-intuitive. On the other hand, there is virtually no change in vote shares in smaller, heavily GOP counties.â€
snip
-
Another elections watchdog, who holds a Masters Degree in Applied Mathematics just published preliminary results of his analysis of the cumulative vote shares in the Kentucky governor’s race, finding that the “cumulative vote shares indicate likely fraud.â€
:rotf: :lmao: :rotf: :lmao: :rotf: :lmao: :rotf:
Richard Charnin a/k/a TruthIsAll a/k/a TruthIsWhatI'veDecidedItIsBeforeIEvenGetStarted
What a kook!
.
-
"Investigations" and "studies" like these are always easier when one builds the desired conclusion into the assumptions and "analysis" methodology.
-
LiberalArkie
20. The only problem is getting those paper ballots in the ballot box from the precinct to the courthouse where the county clerk can count them. When I was growing up in south Arkansas it was a known fact that the deputies transporting the ballot boxes from the black precincts would open them up remove the ballots and replace them with different ballots and reseal the boxes with the county seal. And then take them to the court house. It was always in the local paper that ballots were found discarded by the side of the road.
Priceless :mental:
.
-
The always unreliable Truth is All. That clown even thinks Nixon stole his two presidential elections.
-
The always unreliable Truth is All. That clown even thinks Nixon stole his two presidential elections.
We should know something definitive in 24 business hours :rotf:
-
And Dick, Richard Charmin (misspelled on purpose), whatever you call yourself. I can run 100k Monte Carlo simulations too. Mine usually involve sports, but OFTEN they end up with the 9% chance winning.
Go see Mr. Whipple & wipe your ass.
-
Within 24 business hours I fully expect to see a recount of this election.
-
kentucky hates obama so much we were the first state to close up shop election night in '12
-
I'm calling out Ex DUmmy TruthIsAll (TIA, AKA Richard Charnin for those not familiar) on this.
The bastard changed his formula to get the result he wanted. It was always EXIT polls that mattered, and proved 'fraud' via his half-assed "TrueVote" system.
Now its regular polls leading into the election that matter... :lmao:
And here is why you are wrong, Charnin.
One. - there were a total of six public polls taken between August and the election. And none of them were close enough to the election to really matter.
Two. - out of those six polls, half of them were candidate sponsored. Those should be tossed.
Three. - Fairly low, off-season turnout. (31% of RVs) That is never good for the Democrat.
Four. - Motivated conservatives.
Five. - Those polls over-sampled Dems and independents. The truth is, there are very few genuine independents. Partisans make up a large percentage of the indies- They do it to claim moral authority over those 'unthinking, robotic, lever pullers.'.
-So there you have it. Typical TIA, with his 'Garbage in, garbage out' formulas.
-
All your elections are belong to us!
-
Had never heard of this TruthIsAll character before. Sounds like a classic conspiracy-theorist - select, jigger, and manufacture data and methods to fit the pre-determined conclusion. Whatever doesn't fit is part of the conspiracy.
I see at least some DU-folk are rather casual about things like copyrights and people's (insert scare quotes here) intellectual property. But with a little Nadining I found the source of the quote (http://www.addictinginfo.org/2015/11/08/analysis-of-kentucky-election-results-indicates-fraud-video/) in the DU OP. Another source for the election fraud claim is Brad Friedman, owner/writer of BradBlog.com, which looks to be another Prog commentary & conspiracy theory site.
So a DU conspiracy-theory fruitcake quoted a conspiracy-theory fruitcake's article whose sources are two more conspiracy-theory fruitcake! If Richard and Brad get really lucky, MesSNBC might pick up and broadcast their drivel on one of their fruitcake-shows (is Rachel Madcow still on MesSNBC?).
-
Ah, good ol' TIA - all the elaborate mathematical analysis in the world, but always built on a foundational structure of arbitrary and baseless assumptions. A master builder of Wolkenkuckuckländer
-
My analysis of the Kentucky election results indicates people in the Commonwealth of Kentucky are tired of Obarry, dimrat, liberal, and progressive BULLSHIT, and voted their best interests to minimize the damage from their policies.
-
The basis for the lunatics entire life of proving election theft is that anyone ever voting democrat is a comrade of Lenin and will never vote anything different regardless of circumstances.
-
Well, Charnin is one the most psychotic of the psychotic, and it's been a long time since I heard the name "Bev Harris". It's funny to see them use examples of Democrats convicted of election fraud to prove Republicans committed election fraud last week.
-
.....and it's been a long time since I heard the name "Bev Harris".
Yeah, poor Bev, one of the more prominent victims of the primitive lynch mob several years ago.
I know my opinion's a minority one, but I for one hope she's flourishing and prospering.
A lovely woman, Bev, when I knew her.
-
It was always in the local paper that ballots were found discarded by the side of the road.
Priceless :mental:
.
Because cops are too stupid to take them home and toss them in the fireplace.
-
Yeah, poor Bev, one of the more prominent victims of the primitive lynch mob several years ago.
I know my opinion's a minority one, but I for one hope she's flourishing and prospering.
A lovely woman, Bev, when I knew her.
I always wondered where she landed after the purge.
-
Didn't he win by too big of a margin for there to be any fraud, since it usually happens on the other side.
Cindie
-
I suppose you had to have read the TIA/Charnin threads on the Presidential election to get the full flavor, but he put huge amounts of effort into statistical analysis down to the nth degree of OCD and worked himself into a heart attack over it on top of that (Truly, a loon of the first water). However, the foundation underlying that magnificent and soaring palace of statistics was a tidal sandbar of quite dubious assumptions.