The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: BannedFromDU on October 28, 2015, 09:16:15 AM

Title: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: BannedFromDU on October 28, 2015, 09:16:15 AM
Quote
CoffeeCat (20,171 posts)

Am I wrong to be upset about this question on my child's homework? [View all]

My 15-year old daughter brought home a worksheet for history class. They are studying maps.

This is one of the questions on this homework:

"You have 200km worth of fuel. You are leaving from the Syria/Turkey border. You want to bomb Mosul, Rajah, Sinjar and then return. Will you make it? Please explain your answer."

My initial sense--Why are you teaching my 9th grader about maps and distance with a scenario involving bombing three cities?

Isn't this perpetuating war? Hatred of the Middle East and the people in it? Desensitizing our kids to killing and bombing and destroying the Middle East?

This scenario didn't have to be used. The teacher could have used a number of scenarios and seems to be purposely interjecting war/bombing into the homework on purpose.

In this day and age of hi def cameras on everything you can buy, the stupid ****ing liar can't manage to show even a bit of FAKED evidence. (http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=7293950)

About 100 replies, roughly 3% are concerned with the complete lack of proof. Yet I will take a wild guess that the stupid **** has 5000 hi-res picks of her cat somewhere on DU.

Later:

Quote
CoffeeCat (20,171 posts)
112. Ok look...

We are all in agreement that this homework and the questions on the homework are outrageous.  No, we aren't, because you haven't provided even faked evidence that this happened. Even Dan Rather went to that trouble.

I'm the one who has to make the decision about what to do. And it could affect my kids.  You lying now affects your kids, you stupid ****.

I appreciate that some people don't believe me. That's fine, but if posting a pic is the only way to make people believe me, then I guess I'll just have to be seen as a liar for now (by some), because I'm not quite sure what to do.  If I find even ONE picture posted by you on DU, I'm burning a mole.

It's very easy to tell someone what to do in a situation like this, but it's not that easy. It's exceedingly easy, you stupid ****: post a picture, or you're LYING.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: BannedFromDU on October 28, 2015, 09:45:06 AM
She digs deeper:

Quote
CoffeeCat (20,172 posts)

117. There is a map on the back side of the homework...

I believe those cities were identified, but I didn't look closely at the map. My daughter took the homework to school this morning.

Last night, I put taped white strips of paper over her answers and over her name--and I took pictures.

I noticed though, at the top of the page--the teacher's name is on the homework. This is a female teacher who authored this homework. However, my daughter's social-studies teacher is male. I asked my daughter about this at breakfast and she said that this female teacher is one of the other social studies teachers at her school.

So apparently, her male teacher used a homework sheet authored by this other female social studies teacher.

Hard to wrap my brain around the fact that a female teacher would do this. I did look at her FB page and she is definitely a Republican.

I brought my husband into this discussion, and he's now attempting to block her name from the pic I took. I don't know how to do that. He thinks it's fine if the pic is posted as long as the teacher isn't identified.

     Liberals: when they're caught lying, they revert to sexism and politics. What a sorry sack of ridiculous shit CoffeeCat is.

     Time to go sleuthing.

Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: Carl on October 28, 2015, 09:47:50 AM
 :rofl:
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: USA4ME on October 28, 2015, 09:50:19 AM
20,000 posts and a nut case. Yeah, she's posted personal pics before, you can count on it. Just a matter of someone finding one and asking her why she could post that one but not this one. Just make sure it is a personal pic from a photobucket account or something similar and not some image from a website.

Upon further reading, I see she's now claiming that posting a pic could come back on her kid, so she's in a quandary as to what to do. Maybe she should stop lying; that would be a start.

.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: BannedFromDU on October 28, 2015, 09:59:53 AM
20,000 posts and a nut case. Yeah, she's posted personal pics before, you can count on it. Just a matter of someone finding one and asking her why she could post that one but not this one. Just make sure it is a personal pic from a photobucket account or something similar and not some image from a website.

Upon further reading, I see she's now claiming that posting a pic could come back on her kid, so she's in a quandary as to what to do. Maybe she should stop lying; that would be a start.

.


     What a bunch of bullshit. She could redact everything and post it, but then she'd have to take time out of her busy vibrator-hiding schedule to mock up a phony document.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: thundley4 on October 28, 2015, 10:14:03 AM
Quote
CoffeeCat (20,172 posts)
20. Can you imagine how people in the United States would react...

...if some ninth grader from Iraq or Syria had this for a homework question:

"You have 200 km worth of fuel. You are leaving the Canadian/US border. You want to bomb Detroit, Chicago and Minneapolis then return. Will you make it? Please explain your answer.

I mean...seriously!

**** you. Israel has to put up with Hamas and other terrorist organizations that teach the killing of Jews is a good thing.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: BannedFromDU on October 28, 2015, 10:19:24 AM
**** you. Israel has to put up with Hamas and other terrorist organizations that teach the killing of Jews is a good thing.


     Yes, **** her, but don't get too worked up. This is another fictional account of an event by a DUmmy who wasn't thinking very hard.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: Patriot Guard Rider on October 28, 2015, 11:27:12 AM
Quote
nsd (1,796 posts)
59. I don't believe you.

Others have politely and gingerly suggested more or less the same thing ("please post an image"), but I'm going to be impolite and blunt.

This post sounds made up.

The red flags:

1. Why is fuel measured in kilometers?

2. Americans don't measure distance in kilometers anyway.

3. Syria and Turkey have a long border. Where is this hypothetical plane taking off?

4. Mosul is in Iraq. I consider myself relatively well informed for an American, but I couldn't locate Mosul any better than that. There is no way American 9th graders could tell you where Mosul is. In fact, I suspect most of them would guess that Mosul is the name of a breakfast food, high in fiber but not tasty, that people in "Europe" eat.

5. I have never heard of cities called Rajah and Sinjar. I'll bet you dollars to donuts that, assuming these cities even exist, only a small fraction of 1% of American teenagers have heard of them.

If I am wrong, I apologize. But this just sounds like bullshit.

ETA: The problem is akin to the traveling salesman problem, which is a famously difficult and deep math problem. If 9th graders are really being asked questions like this, I have to say that I am very, very impressed with the state of American math education.

Quote
hollowdweller (2,797 posts)
122. I call BS too.

Ok, who really made the two comments above?  :rotf: :rofl: :-)
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: SVPete on October 28, 2015, 11:35:31 AM
This seems rather non-credible. This kind of homework problem would be along the lines of, "You have 200KM of fuel, are starting in Sacramento at the Capitol and are driving to Apple on Infinite Loop in Cupertino. Do you have enough fuel?" And supply the necessary maps, with distance scales. The "extra credit" problems would be, "Do you have enough fuel to take the tour at the Jelly Belly factory in Fairfield?" And, "Should you tour a factory that lures children into eating sugary snacks?"

OTOH, what USAF plane carries just 200KM of fuel?
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: USA4ME on October 28, 2015, 11:39:07 AM
Quote from:
CoffeeCat

20. Can you imagine how people in the United States would react if some ninth grader from Iraq or Syria had this for a homework question:

"You have 200 km worth of fuel. You are leaving the Canadian/US border. You want to bomb Detroit, Chicago and Minneapolis then return. Will you make it? Please explain your answer.

I mean...seriously!

Ridiculous question if such were presented to 9th graders in Iraq or Syria. They all know that if they are sent somewhere to bomb a city they won't be returning.

.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: Patriot Guard Rider on October 28, 2015, 11:40:30 AM
This seems rather non-credible. This kind of homework problem would be along the lines of, "You have 200KM of fuel, are starting in Sacramento at the Capitol and are driving to Apple on Infinite Loop in Cupertino. Do you have enough fuel?" And supply the necessary maps, with distance scales. The "extra credit" problems would be, "Do you have enough fuel to take the tour at the Jelly Belly factory in Fairfield?" And, "Should you tour a factory that lures children into eating sugary snacks?"

OTOH, what USAF plane carries just 200KM of fuel?

Wouldn't you need close to that quantity just to take off?
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: Big Dog on October 28, 2015, 12:22:41 PM
That bouncy sucked donkey balls.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: freedumb2003b on October 28, 2015, 01:48:58 PM
Quote
CoffeeCat (20,172 posts)
20. Can you imagine how people in the United States would react...

...if some ninth grader from Iraq or Syria had this for a homework question:

"You have 200 km worth of fuel. You are leaving the Canadian/US border. You want to bomb Detroit, Chicago and Minneapolis then return. Will you make it? Please explain your answer.

I mean...seriously!

Answer: Detroit and Chicago are liberal hell holes.  Minneapolis is the home of the Vikings. The USA is better without them. Need I say more?
 
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: Patriot Guard Rider on October 28, 2015, 01:54:08 PM
Answer: Detroit and Chicago are liberal hell holes.  Minneapolis is the home of the Vikings. The USA is better without them. Need I say more?

So, if you were to leave from say, El Paso in a B52 to bomb those cities, and you were traveling at 500 km per hour, considering the rotation of the earth, how long would it take you to fly to Myrtle Beach for a family vacation and how much fuel would you use?
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: freedumb2003b on October 28, 2015, 01:54:44 PM
Quote
OTOH, what USAF plane carries just 200KM of fuel?
Wouldn't you need close to that quantity just to take off?

"KM" is Kilometers.  KG (or just K) is Kilograms.  Granted, jets usually measure in terms of the mass of fuel, but most people, especially teachers, would use L(itres) or the rare KL (Kiloliters)

More proof this is a bouncy.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: freedumb2003b on October 28, 2015, 01:55:27 PM
So, if you were to leave from say, El Paso in a B52 to bomb those cities, and you were traveling at 500 km per hour, considering the rotation of the earth, how long would it take you to fly to Myrtle Beach for a family vacation and how much fuel would you use?

How many Kilometers of fuel do I have?
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: Patriot Guard Rider on October 28, 2015, 02:02:06 PM
How many Kilometers of fuel do I have?

Sorry, you have to solve for X. You took algebra in hig...LOOK, a squirrel
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: freedumb2003b on October 28, 2015, 02:11:56 PM
Sorry, you have to solve for X. You took algebra in hig...LOOK, a squirrel

Step 1: Let a=b.
Step 2: Then a^2 = ab,
Step 3: a^2 + a^2 = a^2 + ab,
Step 4: 2 a^2 = a^2 + ab,
Step 5: 2 a^2 - 2 ab = a^2 + ab - 2 ab,
Step 6: and 2 a^2 - 2 ab = a^2 - ab.
Step 7: This can be written as 2 (a^2 - a b) = 1 (a^2 - a b),
Step 8: and cancelling the (a^2 - ab) from both sides gives 1=2.


Thus 1=2
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: SVPete on October 28, 2015, 02:19:21 PM
Wouldn't you need close to that quantity just to take off?


"KM" is Kilometers.  KG (or just K) is Kilograms.  Granted, jets usually measure in terms of the mass of fuel, but most people, especially teachers, would use L(itres) or the rare KL (Kiloliters)

More proof this is a bouncy.

True. Range is typically specified in miles or KM, but fuel capacity in some unit of liquid measure. That said, 200KM is a little over 120 miles, far less than the kind of range I'd expect of a USAF (or USN) plane. So the whole exercise, IF REAL, is unrealistic. OTOH, the route one would take from Sacto, via Fairfield, to Cupertino is realistic, though I think the distance is on the order of 150 miles. So a person attempting it should refuel their car after touring the jelly Belly factory in Fairfield. Budweiser also has a plant in Fairfield ...
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: Chris_ on October 28, 2015, 02:20:22 PM
Check out the super sekrit "editing" done by CoffeeCat.

(http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff68/kayaktn/DUmmies/31Yzpbi%20-%20Imgur_zps0ne5zg7w.png)
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: freedumb2003b on October 28, 2015, 02:48:46 PM
True. Range is typically specified in miles or KM, but fuel capacity in some unit of liquid measure. That said, 200KM is a little over 120 miles, far less than the kind of range I'd expect of a USAF (or USN) plane. So the whole exercise, IF REAL, is unrealistic. OTOH, the route one would take from Sacto, via Fairfield, to Cupertino is realistic, though I think the distance is on the order of 150 miles. So a person attempting it should refuel their car after touring the jelly Belly factory in Fairfield. Budweiser also has a plant in Fairfield ...

Bud has a plant across the street from Newark Airport.  When the wind blows towards the street it smells like cereal (a smell I remember from the Bud plant in Van Nuys and the Miller plant in Azusa).

If they are smart, they won't strike the beer or distillery plants.  That would REALLY piss people off!
 
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: freedumb2003b on October 28, 2015, 02:51:46 PM
Check out the super sekrit "editing" done by CoffeeCat.

(http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff68/kayaktn/DUmmies/31Yzpbi%20-%20Imgur_zps0ne5zg7w.png)

If you are illiterate it is a bad idea to fake evidence using the same illiteracy.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: 67 Rover on October 28, 2015, 02:56:26 PM
Step 1: Let a=b.
Step 2: Then a^2 = ab,
Step 3: a^2 + a^2 = a^2 + ab,
Step 4: 2 a^2 = a^2 + ab,
Step 5: 2 a^2 - 2 ab = a^2 + ab - 2 ab,
Step 6: and 2 a^2 - 2 ab = a^2 - ab.
Step 7: This can be written as 2 (a^2 - a b) = 1 (a^2 - a b),
Step 8: and cancelling the (a^2 - ab) from both sides gives 1=2.


Thus 1=2

Heh.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: 67 Rover on October 28, 2015, 02:58:45 PM
If you are illiterate it is a bad idea to fake evidence using the same illiteracy.


"You want to get your plane back to the Navy battleship in the Persian Gulf?"

Who the f*ck writes this crap?

Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: freedumb2003b on October 28, 2015, 03:11:45 PM
(http://conservativecave.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=104961.0;attach=6507;image)

Never drink and derive.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: freedumb2003b on October 28, 2015, 03:12:50 PM

"You want to get your plane back to the Navy battleship in the Persian Gulf?"

Who the f*ck writes this crap?

The Germans, right after they bombed Pearl Harbor.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: tanstaafl on October 28, 2015, 03:30:42 PM
Step 1: Let a=b.
Step 2: Then a^2 = ab,
Step 3: a^2 + a^2 = a^2 + ab,
Step 4: 2 a^2 = a^2 + ab,
Step 5: 2 a^2 - 2 ab = a^2 + ab - 2 ab,
Step 6: and 2 a^2 - 2 ab = a^2 - ab.
Step 7: This can be written as 2 (a^2 - a b) = 1 (a^2 - a b),
Step 8: and cancelling the (a^2 - ab) from both sides gives 1=2.


Thus 1=2

I did the calculations using my palm pilot and ink pen. You were incorrect, FB2003b, the correct answer is 1=potato.
It's obvious you are an adherent to the common core screw up the kid math.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: Patriot Guard Rider on October 28, 2015, 03:49:38 PM
The Germans, right after they bombed Pearl Harbor.

Bluto? Is that you? What were they supposed to do ya moron?
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: Big Dog on October 28, 2015, 03:50:23 PM
Check out the super sekrit "editing" done by CoffeeCat.

(http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff68/kayaktn/DUmmies/31Yzpbi%20-%20Imgur_zps0ne5zg7w.png)

The whole thing looks like it was written by gNads, who has a history of sucking donkey balls- in Ensenada.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: Patriot Guard Rider on October 28, 2015, 03:51:26 PM
I did the calculations using my palm pilot and ink pen. You were incorrect, FB2003b, the correct answer is 1=potato.
It's obvious you are an adherent to the common core screw up the kid math.

1=potatoe, or melon, or strawberries. Please explain your answer using the example of farmer jones callously murdering innocent wheat or corn stalks. Then write a letter to farmer jones explaining why exterminating moles is a bad idea. (using common core)
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: dutch508 on October 28, 2015, 03:59:09 PM
The whole thing looks like it was written by gNads, who has a history of sucking donkey balls- in Ensenada.

You are currently at Baghdad?


The poor DUmp Monkiez wrote herself a 'test'...
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: thundley4 on October 28, 2015, 04:13:26 PM
Step 1: Let a=b.
Step 2: Then a^2 = ab,
Step 3: a^2 + a^2 = a^2 + ab,
Step 4: 2 a^2 = a^2 + ab,
Step 5: 2 a^2 - 2 ab = a^2 + ab - 2 ab,
Step 6: and 2 a^2 - 2 ab = a^2 - ab.
Step 7: This can be written as 2 (a^2 - a b) = 1 (a^2 - a b),
Step 8: and cancelling the (a^2 - ab) from both sides gives 1=2.


Thus 1=2

But, given that a = b and a^2 = ab, then a^2 - ab = 0. It's impossible to divide by zero.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: dutch508 on October 28, 2015, 04:18:36 PM
So, if you were to leave from say, El Paso in a B52 to bomb those cities, and you were traveling at 500 km per hour, considering the rotation of the earth, how long would it take you to fly to Myrtle Beach for a family vacation and how much fuel would you use?

Well, like they say in orbital mechanics, "It's not so much an issue of flying but just not falling the wrong rate...
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: Patriot Guard Rider on October 28, 2015, 04:22:24 PM
But, given that a = b and a^2 = ab, then a^2 - ab = 0. It's impossible to divide by zero.

Dividing by 0 is acceptable provided farmer jones apologizes for using modern farming equipment dumping untold amounts of co2 into the atmosphere. The proper answer isn't 0, it's whatever you can justify (using common core).

So there.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: Big Dog on October 28, 2015, 04:39:07 PM
You are currently at Baghdad?


The poor DUmp Monkiez wrote herself a 'test'...

It would really be scary if it was real. Good thing it's the misbegotten spawn of a Dummy's imagination.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: USA4ME on October 28, 2015, 04:39:35 PM
Check out the super sekrit "editing" done by CoffeeCat.

(http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff68/kayaktn/DUmmies/31Yzpbi%20-%20Imgur_zps0ne5zg7w.png)

"You have enough fuel to travel a 200km."

travel a 200km???

"You have 200km with of fuel."

with of fuel???

I'd be more concerned of the teacher's poor grammar than I would the questions on the test.

.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: Boudicca on October 28, 2015, 05:02:08 PM
Fellow Cavers,
while all of your answers are brilliant and admittedly quite above my brain's capacity...so I didn't read them except to be baffled by your scintillating knowledge of math...none of you posed this simple query.

WHO THE HELL GOT CLOSE ENOUGH TO THIS BITCH TO PROCREATE WITH HER? 

Are we SURE a sperm donor could have braved the acidic environs of her toxic womb to implant a child?

And if such a baby took root, are we SURE she didn't have Planned Parenthood suck it out to sell its parts and split the proceeds with her?

Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: dutch508 on October 28, 2015, 05:46:17 PM
Fellow Cavers,
while all of your answers are brilliant and admittedly quite above my brain's capacity...so I didn't read them except to be baffled by your scintillating knowledge of math...none of you posed this simple query.

WHO THE HELL GOT CLOSE ENOUGH TO THIS BITCH TO PROCREATE WITH HER? 

Are we SURE a sperm donor could have braved the acidic environs of her toxic womb to implant a child?

And if such a baby took root, are we SURE she didn't have Planned Parenthood suck it out to sell its parts and split the proceeds with her?

Sometimes... the whiskey... it ****s you up...

 ::)
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: SVPete on October 28, 2015, 08:39:09 PM
Check out the super sekrit "editing" done by CoffeeCat.

(http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff68/kayaktn/DUmmies/31Yzpbi%20-%20Imgur_zps0ne5zg7w.png)

I'd like to say, with certainty, that no teacher would be semi-literate to such a degree as to have composed that "test". The. Grammar. Is. Atrocious. Not to mention the blatant Malaprop and ignorance of US Navy ships (the last 2 battleships that were in commission were the Wisconsin and Iowa, and they were taken out of commission in 1991!).

So while there is some possibility that "test" is genuine, I serious, seriously, doubt it. I think it far more likely that the delay in posting it was due to composing it (with rather obvious haste).
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: Boudicca on October 28, 2015, 08:47:34 PM
Sometimes... the whiskey... it ****s you up...

 ::)

Uhhh.
I think that with the birth of every dimmie out there, not only copious amounts of whiskey were involved, but many head droppings, and botched PP abortions.
These current dems are the rejects from PP pay for parts murdering researchers.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: DUKOTA on October 29, 2015, 04:26:18 PM
OP has now been deleted.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: jukin on October 30, 2015, 11:32:41 AM
Quote
CoffeeCat (20,172 posts)
20. Can you imagine how people in the United States would react...

...if some ninth grader from Iraq or Syria had this for a homework question:

"You have 200 km worth of fuel. You are leaving the Canadian/US border. You want to bomb Detroit, Chicago and Minneapolis then return. Will you make it? Please explain your answer.

I mean...seriously!

I'd say it would be a good start to get all three. However, judging by the grammar and other FUs my guess is it is a test from one of those inner cities. I would also hazard a guess that the "teacher" doesn't read cursive.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: Karin on November 01, 2015, 02:24:58 PM
 :rotf: :lmao:  That fake document was HILARIOUS!  Right off the bat, the author says "you must be precocious with your latitude and longitude because there will be civilians..."  which set the whole thing up for comedy gold.  The atrocious grammar!  The fake military-speak!   The misplaced question  marks!   :rofl:

Some DUmmies pick up on the errors.  It looks like most fell for the bouncy, though.
They're so gullible!  Year after year I've been watching them fall for one thing after another. 
 
Quote
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to CoffeeCat (Original post)

Wed Oct 28, 2015, 12:44 AM

Lint Head (12,261 posts)
7. Now that is subversive. Planting a thought while

asking a quiz question. It's pointless. The teacher should be repremanded.

Quote
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Cleita (Reply #36)

Wed Oct 28, 2015, 07:55 AM

Codeine (15,348 posts)
87. It didn't happen.

It's a cheesy fantasy cooked up by the poster.

Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: Tess Anderson on November 01, 2015, 07:46:14 PM
 :rotf:

this isn't the first time Coffee has tried to pull this stunt:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022766628

she is another Dummy nutcase. Btw, this is the school she is defaming now:

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ankeny-High-School/107853482571512

  :mental:
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: Skul on November 01, 2015, 08:39:42 PM
Fuel consumption is indicated  in pounds per hour. Never in distance/range.
What an asinine, contrived bouncy. 
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: Skul on November 02, 2015, 10:11:11 AM
Here ya go.
Check out the lower photo.
Title: Re: They can't even TRY to support their bouncies with evidence: offensive homework
Post by: franksolich on November 03, 2015, 02:10:34 AM
Ta-da.

comment 3011:
http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=81827.3000