The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: CC27 on October 02, 2015, 09:33:38 AM
-
Star Member F4lconF16 (3,260 posts)
In the wake of this latest shooting, I ask once again...
Please.
Please.
Please do not attack the mentally ill.
They are my friends and community and they are NOT the cause of this.
They are NOT to blame for a culture that can watch 22 children shot to death without a response.
They are NOT to blame for a country in which the right to bear a lethal weapon outweighs the right to live without fear of that lethal weapon.
They are NOT to blame for media that react as if misogynistic, right-wing sociopaths are mentally ill.
They are NOT to blame for a health system that has utterly failed to take care of the few that did unfortunately come into contact with the huge numbers of weaponry floating around our streets.
They are NOT to blame.
Please, if you are not going to help them, then at least just shut up and leave them the **** alone. I am tired of watching them demonize
d.
I attack the mentally ill everybody by posting DUmp threads.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027221704
-
If you are a liberal who refuses to see what's in front of your face you ARE mentally ill. This DUmmie obviously has no grasp of reality since he wants everyone to unilaterally disarm, so that only the good guys are unprotected. If a crazy person starts shooting at one of these dummies, I suppose they'd want everyone to keep their weapons holstered and let the looney blow them away. Unreal, illogical and utterly devoid of a shred of self-preservation; if that's not the definition of a :mental: I don't know what is.
Okay, DUmmies, if I see someone threatening you I'll assume it's fine by you to be a victim. I do, however, reserve the right to defend myself, my loved ones and innocent bystanders. Now go back to your ivory white tower.
-
Aren't they passing up the golden opportunity to blame Reagan for all shootings because he released the mentally ill? I mean, they used to use that as another reason to hate him personally.
Oh, that's right. Only various cards, whether it be the race card or the mentally ill card or any others, are only to be played if it benefits the cause of liberalism. If it hurts the cause in any way, then those that use it are to be tarred and feathered.
.
-
If you are a liberal who refuses to see what's in front of your face you ARE mentally ill. This DUmmie obviously has no grasp of reality since he wants everyone to unilaterally disarm, so that only the good guys are unprotected. If a crazy person starts shooting at one of these dummies, I suppose they'd want everyone to keep their weapons holstered and let the looney blow them away. Unreal, illogical and utterly devoid of a shred of self-preservation; if that's not the definition of a :mental: I don't know what is.
Okay, DUmmies, if I see someone threatening you I'll assume it's fine by you to be a victim. I do, however, reserve the right to defend myself, my loved ones and innocent bystanders. Now go back to your ivory white tower.
During the shooting in Virginia several years ago, I bet the most frequently asked question was, "Does anyone have a gun?". In a gun free zone, of course.
-
During the shooting in Virginia several years ago, I bet the most frequently asked question was, "Does anyone have a gun?". In a gun free zone, of course.
Just as there are no atheists in foxholes, there are likewise no gun control advocates in a mass shooting incident. :cheersmate:
-
Just as there are no atheists in foxholes, there are likewise no gun control advocates in a mass shooting incident. :cheersmate:
thanks for the high five. But my statement remains. "Does anyone have a gun", I'll bet my paycheck on it, wass the number one question.
-
If retards are a threat, then eliminate them before they cause harm. Very simple.
-
If retards are a threat, then eliminate them before they cause harm. Very simple.
If it saves just one child, after all.
-
If it saves just one child, after all.
That is their benchmark, isn't it?
Abortion doesn't save children yet they are all for it.
-
I don't want to attack the mentally ill, I just want it to be easier to put them in a place where they won't harm themselves or others.
Cindie
-
thanks for the high five. But my statement remains. "Does anyone have a gun", I'll bet my paycheck on it, wass the number one question.
Based on a circumstance I was involved in once with my in-laws along this line, I would be willing to join you in that bet.
-
Based on a circumstance I was involved in once with my in-laws along this line, I would be willing to join you in that bet.
I noticed your H5/BS count, and the H5 number was 666.. I had to give you one based on that. :cheersmate:
-
I maintain that the best way to prevent future mass shootings is to help better educate the public on the possible warning signs that a person may be at risk of planning to commit a violent act, and encourage them to act and do something about it if they see a friend or family member demonstrating those signs. Nine times out of ten, these shooters were noticeably disturbed people who clearly demonstrated those warning signs, their friends and family KNEW they were dangerous, and yet nobody did anything until it was too late.
For a real life example of how this principle can indeed prevent future shootings, some months after the Aurora movie theater shooting, another disturbed man's family began noticing him acting suspiciously, and looked into it a little deeper. They discovered he was planning a similar movie- theater shooting at the midnight premiere of 'The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn, Part 2.' So, they acted. They called the cops, told them what they knew, the guy was arrested, a potential mass shooting was prevented, and God knows how many lives were saved.
Why have ideas like this never occurred to the DUmmies?
-
Star Member F4lconF16 (3,260 posts)
In the wake of this latest shooting, I ask once again...
Please.
Please.
Please do not attack the mentally ill.
acknowledging that the mentally ill are responsible for another mass shooting is NOT an attack. It is simply a staement of fact. There is no resulting wave of discrimination against the mentally ill. Not one was ever blamed for a mass shooting. Not one was ever beat up because a mass shooting took place.
In short, you're just being paranoid. But then you are mentally ill. So I understand your idiocy.
-
I maintain that the best way to prevent future mass shootings is to help better educate the public on the possible warning signs that a person may be at risk of planning to commit a violent act, and encourage them to act and do something about it if they see a friend or family member demonstrating those signs. Nine times out of ten, these shooters were noticeably disturbed people who clearly demonstrated those warning signs, their friends and family KNEW they were dangerous, and yet nobody did anything until it was too late.
For a real life example of how this principle can indeed prevent future shootings, some months after the Aurora movie theater shooting, another disturbed man's family began noticing him acting suspiciously, and looked into it a little deeper. They discovered he was planning a similar movie- theater shooting at the midnight premiere of 'The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn, Part 2.' So, they acted. They called the cops, told them what they knew, the guy was arrested, a potential mass shooting was prevented, and God knows how many lives were saved.
Why have ideas like this never occurred to the DUmmies?
The DUmmies have wet dreams hoping something like this would happen, and they have open orgasms on national TV when it does. The special snowflakes howl about invasions of privacy when it comes to pro-actively trying to stop someone who is mentally ill. Their end game, their vision, is confiscation. They have no argument to do so if these shootings would actually, you know, stop.
Liberals disgust me.
-
The Mentally Ill aren't responsible as a group for mass shootings? Well, DUHHH-uhhhhhhhhhh! Now apply that rejection of class-based-blame to gun owners as a class, Equine Anus!
And while you're pondering that, ask yourself, if class-based-blame is stupid, how stupid would it be to ignore signs that some individuals in a "class" are dangerous?!
Try thinking beyond your feelings. Try thinking beyond the intent of "solutions" you propose. Try thinking beyond stage 1 and into the consequences of "solutions" you propose, including consequences you do not intend, but which are utterly predictable.
-
Back to 'mentally ill', eh ?
I'm guessing a DUmmy has realized that the shooter was not a 'conservative Republican' after all.
-
Back to 'mentally ill', eh ?
I'm guessing a DUmmy has realized that the shooter was not a 'conservative Republican' after all.
You can bet your a*s that if he had been, it'd be the lead story on all networks for the next month.
-
I noticed your H5/BS count, and the H5 number was 666.. I had to give you one based on that. :cheersmate:
Yeah. I almost had a grand conjunction of having 666 H5s, 66 Bs, and 6666 posts a couple of days ago. I thought about asking for some Bs, but I didn't want dutch all over my ass. :-)
-
(http://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/2609/3830/original.jpg?w=800&h)
-
You can bet your a*s that if he had been, it'd be the lead story on all networks for the next month.
Indeed.
Just considering that the shooter hung out on Reddit was enough to convince me that a conservative Republican he is not. Oh - for those who may not know.. There is this news about him.
http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2015/10/new_details_emerge_on_umpqua_c.html#incart_maj-story-1
The article plainly illustrates that the guy has been a total nutbar since birth - and the school he attended indicates he may have been one of those 'beloved absolutely nonviolent "Aspies" ' that the DUmp loves so much.
Sorry to break it to you primitives, but a mental illness doesn't specifically determine if one is violent or not. Some people diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome are perfectly peaceful, yet socially awkward people. Others are a radioactive lab accident away from transforming into supervillians.
Anyway.. I'm sure we aren't going to hear much more about this now, outside of a push for more gun control - now that the 'conservative Republican' thing is pretty much dead & buried.
-
The Albany Times Union has an article today where New York's own 'Wannabe Tyrant,' Andrew Cuomo, says that Congressional Democrats should 'shut the Federal government down' unless 'meaningful gun control' is enacted.
Memo to Dandy Andy--the SCOTUS specifically affirmed the right of citizens to bear arms in their own defense, by beating Washington DC and Chicago in lawsuits. They'd shoot down any attempt to impose the type of 'meaningful gun control' that leads to gun confiscation, which would lead to something called 'civil war.' The anti-gun side would lose, and it would not be pretty. Let's just say that the Tree of Liberty would be watered . . .
-
I maintain that the best way to prevent future mass shootings is to help better educate the public on the possible warning signs that a person may be at risk of planning to commit a violent act, and encourage them to act and do something about it if they see a friend or family member demonstrating those signs. Nine times out of ten, these shooters were noticeably disturbed people who clearly demonstrated those warning signs, their friends and family KNEW they were dangerous, and yet nobody did anything until it was too late.
For a real life example of how this principle can indeed prevent future shootings, some months after the Aurora movie theater shooting, another disturbed man's family began noticing him acting suspiciously, and looked into it a little deeper. They discovered he was planning a similar movie- theater shooting at the midnight premiere of 'The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn, Part 2.' So, they acted. They called the cops, told them what they knew, the guy was arrested, a potential mass shooting was prevented, and God knows how many lives were saved.
Why have ideas like this never occurred to the DUmmies?
One sign of mental illness is voting democrat. I think that eliminating democrat voters from owning guns would bring mass shootings down to zero. Also in fascist-democrat controlled cities the count could go down except the diversity squad doesn't get their guns legally.
-
(https://scontent-dfw1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xla1/v/t1.0-9/11990558_10156170874665515_8681231583227781425_n.png?oh=c93ee2504fff1756c737a94a7c56e0da&oe=56873F2A)
Just saying....