The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dutch508 on October 02, 2015, 12:01:42 AM
-
Stinky The Clown (53,140 posts) http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027220940
In the coming days . . . it is all so damned predictable.
There will be an outcry from the public. They will decry our gun laws. The President will take to the airwaves (as he already has) and show some righteous (indeed, it IS righteous) indignation and a flash of anger mixed with grief (as he already has).
As a nation we will talk about it.
And then Wayne LaPierre and his storm troopers will come out and call for more to be spent on mental health. Which is total ****ing bullshit. I don't know anything about the shooter du jour, but in the past we learn that these people tend to get their guns legally, and tend to fly under anyone's radar untilt they burst - literally - onto the scene, guns ablaze.
As Obama said tonight, the nation is numb to this.
God knows we have to appease the gun humpers. Can't take away their Second Amendment steel dildos.
And so this grief will pass for the nation, but not for the loved ones of the victims. And so Republicans will once again say NO to any limit of guns.
And so it goes . . . . .
. . . . until next time.
And there will as certain as the sun will rise tomorrow be a next time. With more bodies. More blood. More cordite in the air. More death. More lives ripped apart. And more intransigence by the WORTHLESS BOUGHT AND PAID FOR CONGRESSIONAL GUN APOLOGISTS.
****.
Just ****.
::)
Baitball Blogger (21,395 posts)
1. Get the gunners out of Congress.
Tab (9,824 posts)
8. some additional predications
Everythings under investigation
We don't want to politicize the process - that wouldn't show respect
Wayne LaPierre wil decry the fact that every one isn't carrying; if we all were armed we wouldn't have this (actually, it'd be worse)
I noticed this time how a few of the news orgs had prepped these extensive "this is how we've gotten to this night" which, from the quality of come of the piece, I'm pretty sure they had it on the shelf to play for when the next shooting happens, and you know there'll be other shootings
-
One's curious about what the sparkling old dude wants to do with his own front yard, Baltimore.
Oh.
I forgot.
Those gun "owners" are okay, by his book.
-
The gun grabbers will make more noise about taking guns away, and gun sales will soar like they do every time Obama opens his cock hole about new gun laws.
-
Even though the media is trying to keep it quiet it sounds as if the shooter was a leftist with possible muzzie ties.
Lets talk bans now stinkbrain.
-
The gun grabbers will make more noise about taking guns away, and gun sales will soar like they do every time Obama opens his cock hole about new gun laws.
Prohibition didn't work.
And remember the primitives' chief argument in favor of decriminalizing drugs is that prohibition of them doesn't work either.
So.....what makes the primitives think this would work?
<<<suspect as with booze, a ban would actually make firearms more ubiquitous in society.
-
Anyone who says they want to take away (or somehow lessen) your 2nd Amendment rights is really saying they want to eventually take away your 1st Amendment rights.
.
-
Anyone who says they want to take away (or somehow lessen) your 2nd Amendment rights is really saying they want to eventually take away your 1st Amendment rights.
That is true, very true.
I'm not a gun owner, I've never used a gun, but at the same time I'll bet I'm a more-vociferous supporter of the Second Amendment even than some gun-owners and -users.
It's because the anti-gun nuts want to take away more, much more, than just firearms.
-
Anyone who says they want to take away (or somehow lessen) your 2nd Amendment rights is really saying they want to eventually take away your 1st Amendment rights.
And the 4th, 5th, 9th, and 10th.
-
Stinky The Clown (53,140 posts)
More cordite in the air.
What a complete f*cking idiot. :censored:
-
In a twelve minute speech about the Oregon shooters Barry refers to himself 32 times.
-
No mention of all the shootings in Baltimore & Chicago (or any other major city) by either Stinky or the President.
How shocking...
-
Stinky The Clown (53,140 posts)
More cordite in the air.
What a complete f*cking idiot. :censored:
And too ignorant to know there is a specific reason you call him an idiot.
-
Beware false prophets with stinky feet.
-
No mention of the double digit murders in each of these democrat wonders of diversity: Chicago, Baltimore, Memphis, Detroit, St. Louis, Atlanta, NOLA, Philadelphia, WDC, Madison. Take those cities of leftist diversity (really not so diverse) out and suicides (not classified as gun deaths in other countries) and we have a gun homicide rate of Norther Europe.
And another thing, these mass shootings have greatly increased under King Barky the Liar of Fecal Touch. Under GWB we hardly had any.
-
... gun homicide rate of Norther Europe.
I fear that may change in the coming year and more. And not for the better.
-
What a complete f*cking idiot. :censored:
A shoe in for top contention in DOTY.
Almost all of these mass shootings can be traced to owebuma's divisiveness.
-
" I don't know anything about the shooter du jour, but in the past we learn that these people tend to get their guns legally, and tend to fly under anyone's radar untilt they burst - literally - onto the scene, guns ablaze. "
Wrong, Stinky.
The vast majority of gun- related crimes, including most mass shootings, are committed using guns that the shooter owned illegally. Often, the closest to a mass shooter "Getting their guns legally" is the shooter STEALING guns that were legally owned by a family member (i.e. the Sandy Hook shooter used guns that he stole from his mother), in which case, the answer is simply to try and encourage legal gun owners to more securely store their guns, especially if they know one of their loved ones is mentally unbalanced and displaying the warning signs of getting violent.
Again, I say the best way to help prevent future shootings is by starting some kind of awareness campaign to help better educate the public on the warning signs that a person may be at risk of engaging in violent acts, and encouraging them to get off their butts and do something about it if they see a friend or family member displaying those signs.
-
" I don't know anything about the shooter du jour, but in the past we learn that these people tend to get their guns legally, and tend to fly under anyone's radar untilt they burst - literally - onto the scene, guns ablaze. "
Wrong, Stinky.
The vast majority of gun- related crimes, including most mass shootings, are committed using guns that the shooter owned illegally. Often, the closest to a mass shooter "Getting their guns legally" is the shooter STEALING guns that were legally owned by a family member (i.e. the Sandy Hook shooter used guns that he stole from his mother), in which case, the answer is simply to try and encourage legal gun owners to more securely store their guns, especially if they know one of their loved ones is mentally unbalanced and displaying the warning signs of getting violent.
Again, I say the best way to help prevent future shootings is by starting some kind of awareness campaign to help better educate the public on the warning signs that a person may be at risk of engaging in violent acts, and encouraging them to get off their butts and do something about it if they see a friend or family member displaying those signs.
A noble idea but difficult to put into practice. Example: A couple is getting divorced. The wife calls the police to tell them her husband is mentally unstable and abuses the children. This could be the furthest thing from the truth, but the police have to act. The husband has to give up his guns (and may never get them back, seriousness of the charge and all that, regardless of facts) and go to counseling etc.
2 guys wander the streets of some city. They both mumble to themselves, do a little panhandling, but otherwise bother no one. One is going to be violent, the other isn't. Do you pull them both off the streets?
And finally, who is the arbiter of who is, and who isn't, violent? My money is on someone who is anti-gun and their final word decides. The more "mentally" violent people he/she finds, the more guns the police confiscate.
It was suggested in a thread at the DUmp some time ago, just wanting to own a gun was a sign of mental illness and those people should be denied the right to own one. The only people who could own a gun, according to that thread, were people who didn't want one, proving they were sane.
I agree some sort of pro-active measures need to be taken if someone is believed to be exhibiting signs of violence, and very, very few families would take those measures against a family member, but it becomes a slippery slope. Just my opinion.
-
Even though the media is trying to keep it quiet it sounds as if the shooter was a leftist with possible muzzie ties.
Lets talk bans now stinkbrain.
Sure looks that way:
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/10/02/the-curious-case-of-oregon-shooter-chris-harper-mercer-a-social-media-profile-shaped-modified-and-deleted/
-
Sure looks that way:
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/10/02/the-curious-case-of-oregon-shooter-chris-harper-mercer-a-social-media-profile-shaped-modified-and-deleted/
This one will go down the media black hole quickly, just like that guy that shot the reporter and her cameraman on live TV. Once the media found out he was black, gay and liberal, the story went away in two days. By the way, his manifesto STILL hasn't been released. (But you can bet your ass if the shooter was white and conservative it would have been printed in every paper across America with 4 days.)
-
Take those cities of leftist diversity (really not so diverse) out and suicides (not classified as gun deaths in other countries) and we have a gun homicide rate of Norther Europe.
And another thing, these mass shootings have greatly increased under King Barky the Liar of Fecal Touch. Under GWB we hardly had any.
It comes out to, roughly, ...... Belgium.
Go ahead and do the numbers, lurking (D)ipshits. I dare you.
-
This one will go down the media black hole quickly, just like that guy that shot the reporter and her cameraman on live TV. Once the media found out he was black, gay and liberal, the story went away in two days. By the way, his manifesto STILL hasn't been released. (But you can bet your ass if the shooter was white and conservative it would have been printed in every paper across America with 4 days.)
Probably, as of yesterday. Word is, one of the wounded survivors has/had it.
-
It comes out to, roughly, ...... Belgium.
Go ahead and do the numbers, lurking (D)ipshits. I dare you.
One of the reasons the homicide rate is so low in Japan is, if a man kills his wife and 3 kids, then kills himself, the Japanese count those as 5 suicides. (it's a good reason why the "suicide" rate is so high there).
-
One of the reasons the homicide rate is so low in Japan is, if a man kills his wife and 3 kids, then kills himself, the Japanese count those as 5 suicides. (it's a good reason why the "suicide" rate is so high there).
Thanks! Didn't know that and I lived there for a year. :cheersmate:
-
Thanks! Didn't know that and I lived there for a year. :cheersmate:
I'm here to serve. My mind is full of useless information that doesn't have the ability to earn a nickel.
-
It was suggested in a thread at the DUmp some time ago, just wanting to own a gun was a sign of mental illness and those people should be denied the right to own one. The only people who could own a gun, according to that thread, were people who didn't want one, proving they were sane.
Joseph Heller wrote a book based on this line of reasoning..."Catch 22".