The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: BattleHymn on October 01, 2015, 11:04:49 PM

Title: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: BattleHymn on October 01, 2015, 11:04:49 PM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027220266

Huge fire.  There are a ton of hilarious exchanges in it, from calling for executive orders, confiscation, and everything in between.  It's worth rowing over for a look.  Here is the OP:

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 07:57 PM
Star Member Logical (17,760 posts)

Unless you go door to door and collect all guns, you cannot stop a nut job from shooting people!

Most these horrible mass shootings are done by people who obtained the gun legally. Stopping private sales might help someone not legal to purchase a handgun from getting one.

If a lone nut wants to shoot someone they will steal or borrow a gun and do it. 50,000 hand guns are stolen a year. More than enough to commit all 10,000 murders by hand guns a year.

No one, including most democratic senators, will vote to collect all the guns in America. And with the 2nd amendment in place there is no way to do it easily. 2/3rd of the states are needed to change it. Too many red states to do that.

What is the issue is really is why people in this country want to do mass shootings? Many other countries have a lot of guns. Their citizens just do not want to kill people like this country does. Why is that? Our murder rate is terrible compared to countries we admire. Canada, UK, France, Etc.


Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 08:02 PM
Star Member Fred Sanders (17,491 posts)
1. Australia had the solution. A proven solution. Ban the guns, pass a law, amend the constitution.

Whatever it takes. What laws man made, those laws man can unmake.

Really quite simple where there is the will.

The "throw up your hands in the air in hopelessness" is kind of unAmerican.

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 08:54 PM
Star Member virtualobserver (4,282 posts)
69. You think that Trump deporting 11 million people is hard....

Try confiscating 300 million guns.

Will you personally be a part of the confiscation patrol?

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 08:54 PM
Star Member Fred Sanders (17,491 posts)
70. Non-sequitur.

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 08:58 PM
Star Member virtualobserver (4,282 posts)
74. They are two similar procedures that would require house to house searches

I repeat, will you be volunteering for gun seizure patrol.

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 08:22 PM
LonePirate (2,374 posts)
27. I'm in favor of going door to door and confiscating all guns. The sooner the better.

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 08:27 PM
GGJohn (5,896 posts)
36. So I'm guessing that you'll help with the house to house searchs?

Or will you rely on others with guns to be on the confiscation teams?
And you'll also be in favor of massively violating the 4A?
And, how will you know what houses to search?
There are over 300 million unregistered firearms in the country that the govt. doesn't even know where they are.
Or are you in favor of searching every home in America?
How will the courts receive that 4A violation?

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 08:33 PM
LonePirate (2,374 posts)
44. We empower a national confiscation to coincide with the antiquated 2A repeal.

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 08:31 PM
Star Member PowerToThePeople (7,200 posts)
40. I support door to door collection.

Eom

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 08:56 PM
oneshooter (7,525 posts)
73. And you are willing to go door to door and do it?

Didn't think so.

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 09:10 PM
Star Member juxtaposed (1,015 posts)
92. I'm am so with u on that!

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 09:32 PM
oneshooter (7,525 posts)
104. Then start locally.

Grab a couple of trash cans and go door to door in your neighborhood. Politely knock and when it is answered tell the people why you are there. I am sure that they will allow you to search their house and confiscate any firearms you find.

Good Luck, let us know how it goes, with pictures.

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 09:37 PM
Star Member juxtaposed (1,015 posts)
107. so simple as u said, It would be if we didn't have clowns that felt one was taken their Nuts Too!

But kids will be always Kids..

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 09:43 PM
oneshooter (7,525 posts)
114. Go ahead and do it.

You have "right" on your side, if they don't like it then do it anyway.

After all, they are "cowards without their guns", so once you control them they should be crying at your feet.

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 09:57 PM
GGJohn (5,896 posts)
129. We seem to have a lot of Keyboard Kommandos here.

They want house to house searches and confiscation, but they're not willing to do it themselves, they would rely on others with guns to do their dirty work.

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 11:24 PM
Star Member PowerToThePeople (7,200 posts)
165. I will do it, if the laws are passed

Deputize me, I am more than willing,

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 11:27 PM
GGJohn (5,896 posts)
168. Yeahh, sure you would.

 

So you would carry a gun to take guns away from law abiding citizens? That would make you a hypocrite.

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 11:29 PM
Star Member PowerToThePeople (7,200 posts)
171. I never said I would have a gun.

The only ones saying that are the pro-gun peeps. I also said I would not do it unless laws were passed outlawing the weapons.

Your whole post is false.

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 11:31 PM
GGJohn (5,896 posts)
174. Ok, then how would you get people to comply?

Ask politely?

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 11:33 PM
Star Member PowerToThePeople (7,200 posts)
175. Yes, or get a search warrant.

By your logic, mlk, ghandi, and other non-violent movements could never have succeeded.

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 11:37 PM
GGJohn (5,896 posts)
179. MLK, Ghandi were advocates of self defense,

MLk applied for a Concealed Carry Permit but was denied by a racist system.
And what would you base your application for a search warrant on? Speculation?
No judge is going to grant a search on a hunch, there has to be reasonable suspicion.

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 10:21 PM
Throd (6,234 posts)
143. So people with guns are going to search all properties to confiscate guns?

People like you are why my batshit-crazy uncle and his friends have guns buried or hidden in remote locations.

Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: Maverick1987 on October 01, 2015, 11:35:01 PM
OK. I nominate Rolex Randys1 to personally come take mine.
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: sharkhawk on October 02, 2015, 03:35:36 AM
I've said this before to the gun grabbers.  Start in the areas with the most crime, the inner cities.  Go door to door in the ghettos and grab the guns.  That is where the most murders are.  Watch DUmmies heads explode.
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: franksolich on October 02, 2015, 04:03:22 AM
I've said this before to the gun grabbers.  Start in the areas with the most crime, the inner cities.  Go door to door in the ghettos and grab the guns.  That is where the most murders are.  Watch DUmmies heads explode.

Man, so many of us have suggested that.  Over and over and over again.

I know that I've personally suggested it to the sparkling old dude, who lives in an affluent nearly-all-white suburb of Baltimore, like, at least approximately 11,062 times.

And even to Jugs up in Minneapolis, at least a hundred times.

They say that dripping water eventually erodes away a rock, making an impression, but I'm wondering that that's true, at least when it comes to penetrating primitive skulls.
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: txradioguy on October 02, 2015, 04:06:06 AM
Quote
hu Oct 1, 2015, 07:57 PM
Star Member Logical (17,760 posts)

Unless you go door to door and collect all guns,

(http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/b1/45/36/b14536d432ba93029f60fb425bf220b7.jpg)



Quote
you cannot stop a nut job from shooting people!

Wanna bet?  It's rather easily actually.

(http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/15/0b/46/150b4642b2db83b2f58216c303214537.jpg)


Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 08:02 PM
Star Member Fred Sanders (17,491 posts)
1. Australia had the solution. A proven solution. Ban the guns, pass a law, amend the constitution.

Whatever it takes. What laws man made, those laws man can unmake.

Really quite simple where there is the will.

The "throw up your hands in the air in hopelessness" is kind of unAmerican.

(http://static.infowars.com/bindprev/2013/07/From-My-Cold-Dead-Hands-624x351.jpg)




Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: Carl on October 02, 2015, 05:07:10 AM
I thought they hated the police.
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: Patriot Guard Rider on October 02, 2015, 05:17:18 AM
I thought they hated the police.

They do, unless they don't. See? It's easy!
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: Carl on October 02, 2015, 05:19:50 AM
Quote
Response to RKP5637 (Reply #105)

Thu Oct 1, 2015, 11:10 PM

workinclasszero (5,142 posts)
158. Ikr? smh

This country is pathetic. We can't even defend our own children from mass murderers cause gee it's just to hard!

Any dumb animal will fight to the death to protect their offspring but not humanity oh hell no!

Well in America anyway.

Coming from mutts that believe ripping an unborn baby to pieces should be a right of passage to adulthood.
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on October 02, 2015, 05:41:14 AM
You and what army?
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: BlueStateSaint on October 02, 2015, 05:46:29 AM
A fair number of the County Sheriffs in NYS have told Governor Andrew Cuomo to pound sand on the 'NY SAFE Act.'  They know that, even in the PRNY, that the first guy through the door in your masturbatory 'gun confiscation' has about an even-money chance of leaving said residence in a body bag.  Even the New York State Police will not use a 'SAFE Act' charge as the primary charge against someone.  (You can't get them to admit that, however.)  Why?  LEOs in NYS know that it's a bad, unconstitutional law.

Please, DUmmies, sign up for this. :fuelfire:
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: 67 Rover on October 02, 2015, 07:14:17 AM
Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 08:02 PM
Star Member Fred Sanders (17,491 posts)
1. Australia had the solution. A proven solution. Ban the guns, pass a law, amend the constitution.

Whatever it takes. What laws man made, those laws man can unmake.

Really quite simple where there is the will.

The "throw up your hands in the air in hopelessness" is kind of unAmerican.


This mutt actually believes that the rights enumerated in the Constitution are granted by man and his government. Molon Labe.
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: Maxiest on October 02, 2015, 07:50:39 AM
I thought they hated the police.

As I was reading this, this was my first thought as well.  I swear the DUmmies pretzel logic is so screwed up that it hurts my head sometimes.

Anyway, Chicago crime yesterday.  I counted 3+ shot dead and 10+ wounded, were is the outrage Obama?

http://chicago.suntimes.com/category/7/71/news/crime/
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: FiddyBeowulf on October 02, 2015, 08:56:33 AM
I hope the DUmmies calling for door-to-door confiscation realize that means going to every door for it to work. That means their own door. Who knows what drugs, child porn or other things the authorities would find during the searches.   :whistling:
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: BannedFromDU on October 02, 2015, 09:13:48 AM
OK. I nominate Rolex Randys1 to personally come take mine.


     Hear, hear. If we are having our guns taken away, I want to choose the fool I pity. Since Randy has already called for a civil war, let him come. Since he is ready to abandon his business because he hates capitalists, let him come.

     Wear that two-tone Submariner when you come, Randy.
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on October 02, 2015, 09:44:23 AM
It would be a low-life-expectancy kind of job in this part of the country, and damn' few local LEOs would want any part of it themselves for principle reasons, not just practical ones.
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: Mr Mannn on October 02, 2015, 10:00:36 AM
It would be a low-life-expectancy kind of job in this part of the country, and damn' few local LEOs would want any part of it themselves for principle reasons, not just practical ones.
Bingo. LEOs can't even serve a search warrant without another 100 to back them up
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: Carl on October 02, 2015, 10:22:44 AM
It would be a low-life-expectancy kind of job in this part of the country, and damn' few local LEOs would want any part of it themselves for principle reasons, not just practical ones.

Exactly,any declaration to confiscate guns is tantamount to a declaration of war on the citizenry with law enforcement at the front.
I doubt few would like to be its first causality.
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: Skul on October 02, 2015, 03:00:40 PM
DUmmies, this is precisely why the second was written and exists.
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: SVPete on October 02, 2015, 04:16:43 PM
OK. I nominate Rolex Randys1 to personally come take mine.

I'm kinda hoping some DU-folk volunteer for the confiscation duty. Especially in rural areas. Just don't warn them about what to do when they hear banjo music.
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: Delmar on October 02, 2015, 04:18:40 PM
Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 08:31 PM
Star Member PowerToThePeople (7,200 posts)
40. I support door to door collection.

Eom

This primitive needs to change its name. 

Why don't one of you lurking POS primitives post a poll at democrat underground asking how many of you would vote to swap out the Bill of Rights in exchange for the Second Bill of rights?  I'd wager over 90% of you children would jump on it.
Quote
The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;
The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;
The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
The right of every family to a decent home;
The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
The right to a good education.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Bill_of_Rights
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: Boudicca on October 02, 2015, 04:26:44 PM
I've said this before to the gun grabbers.  Start in the areas with the most crime, the inner cities.  Go door to door in the ghettos and grab the guns.  That is where the most murders are.  Watch DUmmies heads explode.

That would certainly kill their liberal idealism in one fell swoop.  I want to see the documentary. :popcorn:
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: Maverick1987 on October 02, 2015, 04:42:11 PM
...penetrating primitive skulls.

...with lead projectiles.

Always an appropriate phrase when discussing firearm confiscation.
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: BlueStateSaint on October 02, 2015, 05:00:23 PM
...with lead projectiles.

Always an appropriate phrase when discussing firearm confiscation.

What about those of us who shoot jacketed bullets? :whistling:
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: Maverick1987 on October 02, 2015, 05:19:06 PM
What about those of us who shoot jacketed bullets? :whistling:

They (the intended targets) are not worth the extra cost.  However, I will not discriminate. :-)
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: obumazombie on October 02, 2015, 05:50:02 PM
I would support a door to door collection of guns if libs would agree first to...
No more welfare for the able bodied,
No more abortion,
Door to door removal of all illegal aliens,
A complete sealing of our southern border with fence or other physical non breachable obstacles,
No more social promotion, or affirmative action,
A flat tax,
A complete removal of owebumacare,
A complete repeal of title 9,
Elimination of the TSA,
Elimination of the Dept. of Energy,
Elimination of Dept. of Education,
Repeal of CRIA
Complete repeal of all unfunded mandates,
Make EPA regulations optional till such time as they are enacted by congress,
Open all federal lands to oil production,
Eliminate all subsidies for alternative energy,
A massive rollback of regulation on the coal industry,
Once all that is done, I will support a repeal of the 2nd amendment if I don't conveniently change my mind after getting all I asked for...you know, just like libs do.

Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: 98ZJUSMC on October 02, 2015, 05:55:48 PM
Please, (D)Ummies.  PLEASE do this.

Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 08:02 PM
Star Member Retard said Fred (17,491 posts)
1. Australia had the solution. A proven solution. Ban the guns, pass a law, amend the constitution.

Tell that to the two shot, yes MASS KILLING!!!111!!!! just yesterday down under, you retarded dink


Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 08:54 PM
Star Member Retard said Fred (17,491 posts)
70. Non-sequitur.
:rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:

Now, define that term, paint chip eater.   :rotf: :rotf:  :bird:
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: Patriot Guard Rider on October 02, 2015, 06:48:33 PM
I'm kinda hoping some DU-folk volunteer for the confiscation duty. Especially in rural areas. Just don't warn them about what to do when they hear banjo music.

Not to burst your bubble there SVPete, but they'd probably look forward to it had have an extra bottle of lube to boot.
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: txradioguy on October 05, 2015, 04:59:25 AM
Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 08:02 PM
Star Member Fred Sanders (17,491 posts)
1. Australia had the solution. A proven solution.

Is it?

Quote
There was a large gun buyback in 1996 and 1997 that reduced gun ownership from 3.2 to 2.2 million guns.  But immediately after that gun ownership increased dramatically and is essentially back to where it was before the buyback. Why is that important?  Well, if it is the number of guns that is important, you should initially see a large drop in suicides or crimes and then see it increasing.  Yet, in none of these data series do you observe that pattern.

For example, homicides didn't fall until eight years after the laws.  It is not clear what theory they have for why the long delay would occur.  Nor can I even find an acknowledgment of that long lag in the cited literature.   A more natural explanation for the drop at the eight year point would be the substantial increases in police forces that occurred at that time.

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Wch1iM2hiJ8/Uh_aTo_r8aI/AAAAAAAAG9k/KsgoGyZOVJQ/s400/Screen+Shot+2013-08-29+at++Thursday,+August+29,+7.32+PM+1.png)

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-LqAlgdtLW3s/Uh_aWj123JI/AAAAAAAAG9s/eLE6U3Z30iE/s400/Screen+Shot+2013-08-29+at++Thursday,+August+29,+7.32+PM.png)

Quote
Crime can change for lots of reasons besides changes in gun control laws.  One way to get a handle on this is to see how Australian homicides are changing relative to other crime rates.  A single continuous crime data series isn't available, but the two diagrams below show how homicides is falling almost continuously as a fraction of violent crime.  If anything, the drop in homicides relative to overall violent crime was biggest in the 1970s. 

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-kq5kG5cEU-k/UCkdhHQGU0I/AAAAAAAADWs/CGrEKEHWBkU/s400/Screen+Shot+2012-08-13+at++Monday,+August+13,+11.29+AM.png)

http://johnrlott.blogspot.com/2012/08/some-notes-on-claims-about-australias.html


So much for the DUmmies whole meme about "let's be like Australia" when it comes to guns.

Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: obumazombie on October 05, 2015, 03:13:51 PM
Libs think because Australia is half a world away that they can lie about it and get away scott free.
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: Karin on October 10, 2015, 01:24:08 PM
That was pretty hilarious.  What a perfect job for lonepirate, going door to door stealing everyone's guns!  I've seen his picture.  He's as wispy as a dandelion going to seed.  I imagine he's going to make my top 10 list. 

Also, here's this dumb bitch:

Quote

Response to GGJohn (Reply #30)

Thu Oct 1, 2015, 08:30 PM

Cleita (74,503 posts)
38. Obama needs to sign an executive order tonight declaring a moratorium on the sales of all guns

and ammo until such a convention happens and gun laws for the safety of American citizens and especially children are hammered into place. It's the only way it will happen when the politicians get a fire lit under them.
Quote
Response to Cleita (Reply #38)

Thu Oct 1, 2015, 08:35 PM

GGJohn (6,485 posts)
45. Pres. Obama has no such authority to do so.

EO's only apply to the Executive branch of the govt, not the legislative, nor the judicial branch.
That's civics 101.
Quote
Reply to this post


Response to GGJohn (Reply #45)

Thu Oct 1, 2015, 08:46 PM

Cleita (74,503 posts)
58. I think there is authority out there. It will take clever lawyers to find it, but Georgie Bush sure

found ways of executive ordering our rights away. If there is a will, there is a way.

Back to this idiot:

Quote
LonePirate (2,400 posts)
48. Easily 30% support [repeal of 2A] nowadays and increasing with each passing day. Just a matter of time.


Quote
LonePirate (2,400 posts)
60. Yes, with the right combo of penalties/jail for offenders and incentives for informants

Large numbers of illegal handguns will also be turned over or confiscated over time.

He loves to make stuff up and convince himself it's a fact.  It's a dangerous way to live. 

Quote
Vinca (24,810 posts)
204. Then let's go door to door and collect all the guns.

Everyone who wants theirs back will have to pass an FBI background check, mental health testing and provide proof of insurance in case said weapon does harm in either their hand or another's.

OK, let's!  You first. 


Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: Patriot Guard Rider on October 10, 2015, 01:32:14 PM
Quote
Vinca (24,810 posts)
204. Then let's go door to door and collect all the guns.

Everyone who wants theirs back will have to pass an FBI background check, mental health testing and provide proof of insurance in case said weapon does harm in either their hand or another's.

They don't really mean "let's" as in themselves. "Let's" means getting LEO and the military to do the job they want done, but aren't willing to do themselves, because, like, maybe, they'd get shot.

Amazing. They want guns collected, but want people with guns to go get them. These people aren't anti-gun, they're ok with guns in the hands of law enforcement and the military, they just don't like private citizens to have them.

Liberals disgust me.
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: freedumb2003b on October 10, 2015, 01:41:38 PM
...with lead projectiles.

Always an appropriate phrase when discussing firearm confiscation.

I was going to say that the door-to-door gun confiscators will collect bullets well in advance of guns.
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: Fourwinds on October 10, 2015, 01:56:16 PM
They don't really mean "let's" as in themselves. "Let's" means getting LEO and the military to do the job they want done, but aren't willing to do themselves, because, like, maybe, they'd get shot.

Amazing. They want guns collected, but want people with guns to go get them. These people aren't anti-gun, they're ok with guns in the hands of law enforcement and the military, they just don't like private citizens to have them.

Liberals disgust me.

In all but a few places I imagine they'll be hard pressed to find these people who will willingly do it. Most cops and soldiers I know like guns.
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: Patriot Guard Rider on October 10, 2015, 01:57:38 PM
In all but a few places I imagine they'll be hard pressed to find these people who will willingly do it. Most cops and soldiers I know like guns.

Agreed. LEO and the military have families too.
Title: Re: primitives suggest going door-to-door confiscating firearms
Post by: Ken8521 on October 10, 2015, 02:14:57 PM
Quote
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 11:24 PM
Star Member PowerToThePeople (7,200 posts)
165. I will do it, if the laws are passed

Deputize me, I am more than willing,

Seems pretty appropriate.

 :badass: