The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on September 23, 2015, 06:38:23 AM
-
TheMastersNemesis (5,015 posts)
How Do You Divide A Country Headed For Right & Left Divorce.
It looks more and more that the GOP base and RW Christians cannot live with any form or secularism in government. They insist we will have a theocratic dictatorship with its own Christian sharia law. Meanwhile the rest of us embrace the Constitution and secular government. Neither side will give an inch in its position. And the lines solidify more an more.
It is like a broken marriage where neither party can live with the other in any kind of piece. At best it is a stalemate. At worse it is open political warfare all the time. Could the US be headed for a two state or two nation solution. A red state blue state division.
Now the situation may seem extreme and probably is. There seems to be no way to bridge differences.
villager (23,524 posts)
1. I suspect the effects of climate change will bring about a collapse of empire...
...which, in turn, will bring about the end of the U.S. as s single, continent-wide "polity," eventually breaking down into smaller, regional governments...
2060ish or so? Sooner?
YabaDabaNoDinoNo (176 posts)
4. Works for me! When can we divy states up?
Here has been no real good reason to remain united for a very long time now. Speaking for myself and I am sure others will agree there are parts of the USA and people that I have absolutely nothing in common with at all. I have more in common with people in Canada or Mexico then I do people in Alabama. Alabama is just an example.
I am sure it is vise versa too
The first division should go back to the configuration at the start of the civil war the Potomac River is a good natural division.
onenote (24,634 posts)
17. My guess is that what you actually know about Alabama
could fit on the back of a postage stamp.
YabaDabaNoDinoNo (176 posts)
18. Alabama was just an example and I know plenty about it
In fact I know enough to stay away and have nothing to do with the place and fully support any effort by the state to leave the current union
Basically I don't give a flying f____ about the place.
Fumesucker (41,301 posts)
20. Bless your heart...
YabaDabaNoDinoNo (176 posts)
21. ahhh yes the southern FU
Thanks for confirming why I don't care.
michreject (4,340 posts)
6. What's to stop the armed red countries
from declaring war on the weaker countries, enslaving the radical liberal citizens of the newly formed blue countries?
How about just plain ol' feed yourselves? I have yet to see any evidence that liberals can even feed themselves.
YabaDabaNoDinoNo (176 posts)
7. Not all gun owners are conservative, some of the best warriors I personally know are very liberal
Yeah. Sure.
The combat arms in the military is just spilling over with Bernie Sanders supporters.
ileus (12,696 posts)
23. Guns aren't only sold in red countries....and as a Blue state gun owner I can affirm that.
Besides they learned their lesson a Gettysburg.
Most folks in the South have no interest in the North...way too shitty weather.
damnedifIknow (3,006 posts)
8. Don't like the Constitution?
Well then pack up and go somewhere where there isn't one.
moondust (10,423 posts)
9. Friendly divorce?
Could be quite a challenge dividing up all federal stuff to everyone's satisfaction. Shoulda had a prenup.
But then it might be easier to make "energetic progress in the good" while boycotting and divesting from the bad, similar to South Africa.
Okay.
We'll stop turning our food into ethanol and you can keep your...
...what is it you guys make?
YabaDabaNoDinoNo (176 posts)
11. One should already be boycotting and divesting from the bad if not one is not really engaged.
I always appreciated when the DOTYs get a break-out rookie at the end of the year. It keeps things interesting.
onenote (24,634 posts)
10. When repubs talk of secession we mock them.
Just saying.
YabaDabaNoDinoNo (176 posts)
12. Try to present a counter argument as to why we should remain united
I can't thing of ANY reason why we should remain united
workinclasszero (5,016 posts)
15. I'm gonna live in the Free Blueland
Hopefully we build a massive wall around Republican Sharialand so the freeper teabaggers can't escape when mexico invades and takes back their former land!
spanone (82,207 posts)
19. they, meaning the theocrats, are a small minority.
**** them.
NutmegYankee (10,145 posts)
22. I think we will remain one country.
The ultra-religious and fascists will start to die off soon and shrink in population. They will still be around and very vocal, but as a much smaller minority.
Hear that guys?
We're being out-bred by queers and abortion cultists and if we commit some causus belli micro-aggression their army of hippy warriors are going to give us what-for just as soon as they get their solar powered tank brigades up and running.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027192272
-
(http://blog.theregularguynyc.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Lot-Of-Stupid_large.png)
-
One thing for certain, IF the country does divide among conservative and liberal factions, industries in the liberal part won't have far to go to relocate "overseas".
villager (23,524 posts)
1. I suspect the effects of climate change will bring about a collapse of empire...
Don't hold your breath on that one, Sunshine. On second thought, please do hold your breath! Use duct tape to be absolutely sure. :naughty:
-
Fumesucker (41,301 posts)
20. Bless your heart...
Quote
YabaDabaNoDinoNo (176 posts)
21. ahhh yes the southern FU
Thanks for confirming why I don't care.
That exchange truly is rated :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: !
Aside from that, some one needs to tell the asylum's upper manglement that the loonies are running the bin again!
-
The locust will devoir the blue areas turning it into a no mans land.....suits the hell outta me.
-
The locust will devoir the blue areas turning it into a no mans land.....suits the hell outta me.
There's some of us in those areas, too.
We'll survive.
-
YabaDabaNoDinoNo (176 posts)
7. Not all gun owners are conservative, some of the best warriors I personally know are very liberal
Most of us don't regard Chicago hoodrats as "warriors".
-
Hortensis (801 posts)
27. Nah. But if a Jesusland did take over those areas, they'd turn them into "third
world" states, and the surrounding countries would be taking in their refugees.
Jesusland dictators, religiofascist and koch-ish, would inevitably attack their advanced, progressive neighbors for gain, cloaked in excesses of xenophobic hate and nationalistic aggression, and those nations would then be forced to take them over to clean up the chronic problems over their back fences. Sitting down like nice sensible states to slice up the territories among them and begin working on their economic development.
It's all so clear... Like somehow we've seen it all before.
n2doc (39,704 posts)
29. exactly
There is a liberal fantasy that somehow the Jesusland states would not have any military and that all the military would be kept in the hands of the "true USA" blue states. Even though the military is heavily dominated by soldiers from red states, a lot of military bases are in Jesusland, and they love war much more than do the coasts.
Plus the whole evangelical thing were they are called to spread 'the word'....
meow2u3 (16,900 posts)
41. Let'em have the old Confederate states back for themselves
We also have to make sure we have a strong, but not bloated, military so the neo-Confederates don't start in on us and invade the US the way they did in 1861. We have to secure the Confederate borders so that only the refugees (e.g., black, Latino, and other minorities the Cons will enslave) can come in and white "neo-copperhead" malcontents can go there to live.
Hortensis (801 posts)
34. Almost certainly it would be Publand launching terrorist
attacks on all the dangerous enemies that type'd inevitably see as surrounding them. Not actual invasions because, of course, after the first or second lost attempts, they'd be too poor to rebuild a real army.
-
The Confederacy didn't invade the 'note' until the campaign in 1863.
But don't let history and facts get in the way of your cute little story.
-
Aside from that, some one needs to tell the asylum's upper manglement that the loonies are running the bin again!
I thought that was the whole purpose of the DUmp jury system - to turn the asylum into an arena.
-
NutmegYankee (10,145 posts)
22. I think we will remain one country.
The ultra-religious and fascists will start to die off soon and shrink in population. They will still be around and very vocal, but as a much smaller minority.
Considering the right isn't aborting their future, how's that supposed to happen?
Cindie
-
The Confederacy didn't invade the 'note' until the campaign in 1863.
But don't let history and facts get in the way of your cute little story.
History also shows that the one thing that libtards HATE is the US Constitution and the BOR.
-
Did some one lace their marijuana macaroons with acid?
I need a roller-skate for my chin! My flabber is gasted (and it's not a pretty sight!)!
-
Did some one lace their marijuana macaroons with acid?
I need a roller-skate for my chin! My flabber is gasted (and it's not a pretty sight!)!
This is the DUmp when they are sober and lucid.
-
You know idiots, even in your blue shit holes, your only hold on geography is the cities. In a break up situation, do you really think that, those 30 miles outside of Madison, are going to put up with your shit? 20 miles outside of Cook County?
Think again. Very quickly, you will not be able to travel outside of your enclaves within your own state. Illinois is a perfect example of that. It would be red all the way up to I-80. We'll target the remaining LIbEralS in government for elimination. What are you gonna do ...shoot your own? :rofl:
Mexico invades? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Where you pathetic assholes come up with the Theocracy crap is beyond me, other than you're simply insane. That is the LAST thing we want.
Free clue retards: We don't need the big cities. Quite frankly, don't want them. That will be your headache as they, slowly or quickly, dissolve into chaos and dysfunction unable to sustain or feed themselves.
-
You know idiots, even in your blue shit holes, your only hold on geography is the cities. In a break up situation, do you really think that, those 30 miles outside of Madison, are going to put up with your shit? 20 miles outside of Cook County?
Think again. Very quickly, you will not be able to travel outside of your enclaves within your own state. Illinois is a perfect example of that. It would be red all the way up to I-80. We'll target the remaining LIbEralS in government for elimination. What are you gonna do ...shoot your own? :rofl:
Mexico invades? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Where you pathetic assholes come up with the Theocracy crap is beyond me, other than you're simply insane. That is the LAST thing we want.
Free clue retards: We don't need the big cities. Quite frankly, don't want them. That will be your headache as they, slowly or quickly, dissolve into chaos and dysfunction unable to sustain or feed themselves.
And they need red areas. Why? One word . . .
Water.
-
And they need red areas. Why? One word . . .
Water.
Food
-
workinclasszero (5,016 posts)
15. I'm gonna live in the Free Blueland
Hopefully we build a massive wall around Republican Sharialand so the freeper teabaggers can't escape when mexico invades and takes back their former land!
So let me get this straight, we don't need a wall to separate us from the country that is sending its citizens ILLEGALLY into this country.... but we we need a wall to separate Blueland from Red state hell?
I love how they fail to see the disconnect here.
-
There are no free people in "Blueland", only subjects and wards of the state.