The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: BannedFromDU on September 22, 2015, 12:40:31 AM
-
philosslayer (1,065 posts)
"I’m a pedophile, but not a monster"
I'm attracted to children but unwilling to act on it. Before judging me harshly, would you be willing to listen?
I was born without my right hand. As a child, this deformity quickly set me apart from my peers. In public I wore a prosthesis, an intimidating object to other youngsters because of its resemblance to a pirate’s hook. Even so, I wore it every day; I felt inadequate without it. I was shy, uncoordinated and terrible at sports, all of which put me on the outs with other boys my age. But I was good at drawing and making up stories for my own entertainment, and I spent more and more time in my own head, being a space adventurer or monster wrangler or whatever character I could think up. These would ultimately prove to be useful skills, but for now they only served to further alienate me from other kids. On top of it all, I still struggled with bladder control—likely due to my heaping pile of insecurities, to which this problem only added more—well into my elementary school years.
But none of this would compare to the final insult the universe would deal me. I’ve been stuck with the most unfortunate of sexual orientations, a preference for a group of people who are legally, morally and psychologically unable to reciprocate my feelings and desires. It’s a curse of the first order, a completely unworkable sexuality, and it’s mine. Who am I? Nice to meet you. My name is Todd Nickerson, and I’m a pedophile. Does that surprise you? Yeah, not many of us are willing to share our story, for good reason. To confess a sexual attraction to children is to lay claim to the most reviled status on the planet, one that effectively ends any chance you have of living a normal life. Yet, I’m not the monster you think me to be. I’ve never touched a child sexually in my life and never will, nor do I use child pornography.
http://www.salon.com/2015/09/21/im_a_pedophile_but_not_a_monster/
Suppose that article was written by someone with the surname Bush... (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027190973)
Anyway, here come the enlightened DUmmies, anxious to offer their kid's heinies in tribute:
Star Member brer cat (4,932 posts)
2. Wow. That was a tough read.
I admit that I think of pedophiles as monsters, but Todd Nickerson did manage to drag some sympathy from me. He comes across as very genuine and honest in his assessment of his life and how he must live it. It seems like a nightmare that somehow he is managing to corral. I certainly respect his courage in publicly sharing his story, but it would be very hard for me to trust him.
One thing that jumped off the page was his statement that "Many gays begin to recognize their sexual preferences sometime around puberty, if not before. For me it was the same." Why would he bring gays into the conversation? Maybe I am reading too much into that comment, but if he is suggesting that there is any relationship between gays and pedophiles he is way off base, and dangerously feeding one of the vilest myths about gays.
It is a thought provoking piece, philosslayer. Thanks for sharing.
Yes, it provokes me to think you're a bunch of pedophiles and pedophile apologists, asshole.
Star Member Warpy (84,735 posts)
4. Pedophilia isn't that uncommon, unfortunately.
What is uncommon is men who can't put the brakes on it, to restrict it to their fantasy lives instead of going out to destroy children.
I think the guy in the OP is rather common, actually. I think he shares a lot with other people of all genders and orientations who might have serious kink in their fantasy lives but who never act on it.
Does it bother me that he exists? Nope. People are entitled to their fantasy lives. It only becomes problematic when they try to act it out in real life and hurt other people.
ETA: he's way off base in one regard: the average active pedophile is a straight, married male who is often known to his victims. Gay men are less likely to be molesters and rapists.
Nice try, you sorry ****.
Marr (18,418 posts)
5. I clicked that link already formulating my '**** him' post in my head.
But that was a very illuminating article. Thanks for posting it.
Let's hope you have nothing to do with any child, ever.
Star Member CaliforniaPeggy (116,754 posts)
10. I found this article very illuminating and quite enlightening.
It's funny--I've always assumed that pedophiles always acted on their feelings.
Apparently not.
I find his story compelling, and I would not have a problem being around him with, say, my grandchildren. I believe him when he says: I’ve never touched a child sexually in my life and never will, nor do I use child pornography.
Thanks for posting this, philosslayer.
Yeah, it's not like his SEED is ACHING for your grandchildren, you ugly piece of shit.
Spitfire of ATJ (25,293 posts)
16. Why is it the first thing I thought of was "Republican"?
I figured it was someone now in office.
Because you ignore that your site is in part run by a pedophile.
Assholes, all. **** off and die, DUmmies.
-
Liberals are always soft on crime. I don't understand their thinking at all. They want to coddle criminals instead of punishing them. No wonder our country is in trouble.
-
And the DUmmies and Libtards in general have the audacity to mock people when they say that the next step after gay "marriage" is crap like this.
-
Star Member brer cat (4,932 posts)
2. Wow. That was a tough read.
I admit that I think of pedophiles as monsters, but Todd Nickerson did manage to drag some sympathy from me. He comes across as very genuine and honest in his assessment of his life and how he must live it.
Oh, yeah. It not the act, it's the way you describe it? ::)
Star Member CaliforniaPeggy (116,754 posts)
10. I found this article very illuminating and quite enlightening.
It's funny--I've always assumed that pedophiles always acted on their feelings.
Apparently not.
Sick and twisted is believed 100% of the time, but then, to not believe completely would be blasphemous, right (D)Ullards? It might allow improper thoughts.
Isn't groupthink just dandy!
ETA: he's way off base in one regard: the average active pedophile is a straight, married male who is often known to his victims. Gay men are less likely to be molesters and rapists.
Better tow that line, liar. Believe only the parts you want to, you warped POS.
-
My little brother lost his right arm in a farming accident back in 1968 when he was only 4. Here in the heart of "redneck central" SWVA, not one of his classmates mocked him, ridiculed him, alienated him, or singled him out because of his "difference". Nobody treated him different, to them he was "one of the guys".
This extended to home life as well. Nobody in the family treated him special just because "he only has one arm", he learned and we helped him to do whatever he wanted to do, on those rare occasions he needed/wanted help.
Today, he is a computer programer, and the fastest one-handed typist you've ever seen! :-)
-
DUmmies are so easily led.
"I’m a pedophile, but not a monster"
Don't fool yourself. Of course you are a monster.
-
Liberals are always soft on crime. I don't understand their thinking at all. They want to coddle criminals instead of punishing them. No wonder our country is in trouble.
They are far from soft on crime.
What they do is redefine crime and deviancy.
Consider:
Homosexual - born that way, has no choice but to act that way, cannot act any other way = CONSENTING ADULT
Pedophile - born that way, has no choice but to act that way, cannot act any other way = VICTIM OF CIRCUMSTANCE YOU MUST UNDERSTAND
Drunk female - got that way by choice, knows young men want to have sex, deliberately sought out social situation with drunk men = CANNOT BE CONSENTING adult VICTIM
Drunk male - got that way by choice, knows young women who are drunk are pliable, deliberately sought out social situation with drunk women = CONSENTING ADULT GUILTY OF CRIME
Never mistake a tyrant as soft on crime; understand it's nothing more than a matter of what they choose to deem as a crime.
-
And the DUmmies and Libtards in general have the audacity to mock people when they say that the next step after gay "marriage" is crap like this.
As I've said in the past, it probably won't be long before terms like "Pedophobia" start regularly popping up on the DUmp.
btw, for all this freak's claims about how it's okay because it's just in his mind and he's not acting on it, I'd imagine most if not all convicted child molesters were in the exact same mindset shortly before they first crossed over from fantasy into reality.
-
As I've said in the past, it probably won't be long before terms like "Pedophobia" start regularly popping up on the DUmp.
btw, for all this freak's claims about how it's okay because it's just in his mind and he's not acting on it, I'd imagine most if not all convicted child molesters were in the exact same mindset shortly before they first crossed over from fantasy into reality.
the majority of queers were molested when children. Anything for them to further their cause evidently.
-
ColesCountyDem, the Big Guy's buddy Bob Lewis, who is a registered sexual predator in Illinois and a moderator at the DUmp, has never denied that he's a monster.
In fact, he implied that if DUmmies don't shell out enough for his gofundme scam he'll start trolling for kids again.
-
Lewis likes little boys, this perv prefers the little girls and his advocacy of pedos is nothing new:
http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2007/09/just-another-reason-to-shop-at-home.html
:mental:
-
As I've said in the past, it probably won't be long before terms like "Pedophobia" start regularly popping up on the DUmp.
I look for the left to rename pedophilia and give it a more normal sounding name. So pedophobia will have to be changed to.
-
(http://i300.photobucket.com/albums/nn2/protozoan4/lowes%20copy_zpsctwbkdc2.jpg)
-
The DUmmy's article on pedophilia was in 2007.
I wonder how long he lasted at Lowe's after that.
Lowe's may be a moonbat company, but I'm sure they draw the line somewhere short of pedophilia.
-
The DUmmy's article on pedophilia was in 2007.
I wonder how long he lasted at Lowe's after that.
Lowe's may be a moonbat company, but I'm sure they draw the line somewhere short of pedophilia.
He got a better job at Toy's 'R Us dressing up as Geoffrey the Giraffe. Part time gigs playing Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny.
-
The DUmmy's article on pedophilia was in 2007.
I wonder how long he lasted at Lowe's after that.
Lowe's may be a moonbat company, but I'm sure they draw the line somewhere short of pedophilia.
I think he left there some time ago. Now he's on disability (no surprise there) and claims to be a "free-lance graphic artist" but he still posts on every perv forum he can find.
One of his many facebook pages:
https://www.facebook.com/indigoxix1
don't go to this site without a virus scanner, so I'll post some of his known alts:
Known Screen Names
Markaba
M
Starkroth
neomythic
tonicker
Todd
Lateralus
ICQ: 271840466
this site: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Evil-unveiled.com/Markaba
also claims he's still at Lowes but who knows? I wonder what his DU name is.
-
I'm not buying the "I only think about it...I just don't act on it".
Thoughts inevitably lead to words,
The lib has already made that progression.
Words inevitably lead to actions.
The lib denies this, but even if it's true, it's just a matter of time.
Actions develop into habits.
Habits will determine your destiny.
This lib is destined to be a recidivist pedophile.
I get a kick(by kick I mean a conniption) out of gays who claim they are not likely to be pedophiles, and that it's actually "married straights" who are prone.
I suppose these gays have never heard of NAMBLA.
-
I'm not buying the "I only think about it...I just don't act on it".
Thoughts inevitably lead to words,
The lib has already made that progression.
Words inevitably lead to actions.
The lib denies this, but even if it's true, it's just a matter of time.
Actions develop into habits.
Habits will determine your destiny.
This lib is destined to be a recidivist pedophile.
I get a kick(by kick I mean a conniption) out of gays who claim they are not likely to be pedophiles, and that it's actually "married straights" who are prone.
I suppose these gays have never heard of NAMBLA.
Exactly. This is a confession, not a profession. Big difference. Let's just hope sorry nasty ugly c*** CalPeg's kids have the smarts to keep their kids from pederast-loving granny.
-
DUmmies are perverts. Case closed.
-
Since he started shilling for his pedophile buddy, I think of the Big Guy (who is dying) whenever a child molester is mentioned.
I used to think of the drunken Pitt, but he's out of sight out of mind, at least temporarily.
Anyway, I just started thinking about the Big Guy (who is dying), and it occurred to me that it's been a looong time since he's reminded us and the DUmp of his imminent demise.
I don't think the oversight is due to the progression of his brain rot, since he's still posting those stupid, cutesy animal stories every day.
Is it possible that he's trying to back away from his woe-is-me alleged diagnosis?
-
Seems like a good place for this picture.
-
Nickerson does not use child pornography, present tense. Did he ever? He doesn’t say, but he does admit to being a long-time member of a pedophile website which openly supported child molestation, something he describes with the euphemism “pro-contact.â€
<snip>
Nickerson was part of a community that was run by “monsters†for years. He supported it by his presence and with his voice. Now he wants to be praised for leaving? Read it again. He is literally saying that not being a child rapist deserves special commendation. This is the ultimate participation trophy; anyone who is not an immoral monster gets one.
This is like a member of the mob announcing he is leaving the family and claiming 1) he never did anything wrong and 2) he deserves commendation not criticism. I don’t think the police or the public would buy that story, nor should they. At the very least, the cops are going to want a detailed confession of what the person in question was doing during all that time. Even if the individual never committed a crime themselves, authorities would want insider testimony they could use to take down the rest of the organization. Only then does witness protection and a 2nd chance become an option.
But Nickerson doesn’t seem to grasp that virtue is more than not being a monster. Whether he personally did anything or not, Nickerson was on the wrong side of the line for years. He was part of a group with people who possibly acted on their pro-molestation beliefs. And some of them possibly mentioned it over the years.
If he really wants to be a hero, Nickerson should start by outing his former “pro-contact†friends to the police. If he wants to use his “pedo powers†for good, he should be infiltrating sites like the one he was part of using his background to prevent crimes against children which are still in the formative stages. Is it possible that someone with a pedophile’s monstrous inclinations could do more good than harm? Maybe, but based on his own self-report Todd, Nickerson isn’t nearly there yet.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/09/22/salons-virtuous-pedophile-not-virtuous/