The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: BannedFromDU on August 11, 2015, 11:39:24 AM
-
TheMastersNemesis (4,838 posts)
Why Weren't Oathkeepers Told To Leave Ferguson Or Removed.
Having armed white supremacist militia in Ferguson is hardly the answer during this crisis. They should not be welcomed anywhere in the country.
The answer is as plain as the foot on your leg, DUmmy. (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027066353)
You don't even need me to tell you:
951-Riverside (6,541 posts)
2. 1. Missouri is an open carry state 2. Freedom of assembly and association
They can't be "ordered" out.
The smart thing to do is get rid of open carry laws. (Really? Who was it that opened fire on cops? The Oathkeepers, or some black kid?)
I love when they reveal their true nature.
They have as much right to assemble as you have a right to a foot, Bob.
-
Well, it looks as if Bob's cerebral degeneration proceeds apace.
Not being a physician, I can't guess how much longer Bob has in this time and place, but assume it's far less time than the big guy in Bellevue or Wills the William769 primitive or franksolich, all of us being terminal.
And so it's time for Bob to make peace with himself, which is usually done by returning to one's roots, resurrecting those things that sustained and nourished one at the dawn of life.
Bob's a lapsed Catholic, and so probably it'd be a good thing if he returned to that before it's too late. He needs to go see a priest pronto and admit that he's been angry and bitter and resentful and hate-filled most of his life.....and has finally come to realize, while on the precipice of eternity, that a Hell of a lot of good that did him, being that way.
One hopes he does it before it's too late. For Bob, time's running out at the speed of light.
-
And so it's time for Bob to make peace with himself
I think Bob makes peace with himself several times a day. Probably has a pack of wet naps taped to his wheelchair.
-
Are Oathkeepers the law enforcement people who refuse to violate their oaths to uphold the USC should they be ordered to violate the USC? Or am I thinking of another group with a similar name. If they're who I think they are, there're probably a good number of black, Hispanic, and Asian Oathkeepers, hardly "white supremacist"!
-
Are Oathkeepers the law enforcement people who refuse to violate their oaths to uphold the USC should they be ordered to violate the USC? Or am I thinking of another group with a similar name. If they're who I think they are, there're probably a good number of black, Hispanic, and Asian Oathkeepers, hardly "white supremacist"!
Yes, Oathkeepers are current military, Veterans, and current and former law enforcement.
-
And, more to the point, it's more about what the Oath Keepers weren't doing. To wit, Oath Keepers to date have not:
Looted
Started fires
Attacked cops
Disrupted traffic and normal business
Actively threatened harm
Destroyed property.
Of course, this means that there is another group in Ferguson that has done all these things. Now they're starting to show up at political rallies and hassle old guys.
Guess what, Mastersnemesis? The group that has been doing all kinds of mischief? They're armed too. They just don't have the common courtesy to let you know.
-
Yes, Oathkeepers are current military, Veterans, and current and former law enforcement.
But the SPLC has branded them white supremacist because GUNZ! so the Proglodytes obediently sing that hymn.
-
And, more to the point, it's more about what the Oath Keepers weren't doing. To wit, Oath Keepers to date have not:
Looted
Started fires
Attacked cops
Disrupted traffic and normal business
Actively threatened harm
Destroyed property.
Well that sure as Hades makes them obvious white supremacists!
Thanks for the reminder BD and the further info SGT SB!
-
I bet Obama and crowd are slobbering like an old blood hounds over this. Their long sought after racial war is almost here.
Marshall Law in 2016 anyone?
-
Marshall Law
Facetious, right? :wink:
-
The looters are inflammatory by nature. :mental: